Graviton: The Particle that Gives Gravity? Could it be real?

preview_player
Показать описание
Uncover the controversial mystery of the Graviton particle in this thought-provoking.

Could it be the elusive particle that gives rise to gravity?

Join us as we explore the workings of the Graviton and its potential impact on our understanding of reality.

Share your thoughts on this controversial topic by leaving a comment below.

➡️Like & Subscribe for more educational science content.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

So how would gravitons work with gravity being due to warped space-time? Would they mediate the warping?

dangates
Автор

First of all gravity is the combination of the fundamental particles. And last week that's the best answer. But this week it's when dark energy passes near dark matter it creates the space time curvature. And creates many space time curvatures in the process.
I just finished a paper on gravitons but asked to have it removed after earlier this month online said string theory is dead.so gravitons are dead as well. And my new paper was the theory of sub atomic manifestations.that is "a natural phenomenon must have natural processes" all the processes must be naturally occuring, so looking around on earth at processes provides all the answers to solve it.

Thankyou

jasonhayward
Автор

They say there are gravity waves, they say there is a wave particle duality..

congchuatocmay
Автор

Gravity is simple Galilean relative motion. The earth is approaching- expanding at 16 feet per second per second constant acceleration- the released object: d=1/2at^2 major part of the gravity equation. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon.

davidrandell
Автор

I believe belief as no place in science. We can say "we don't know", unlike people that need to believe.

spidalack
Автор

If space has an event information transmission rate limit, events slow down more between massive objects than in their other surroundings (due to saturation) and one can image that pushing them together.
Likewise you can image objects in relative motion emitting event information and also accelerating objects emitting information events. And then you have a bridge between gravity and relativity.

congchuatocmay
Автор

Am i the only one who connects Gravity, Dark Matter and Dark Energy as the same effect, with different properties over distances? No Graviton, No Dark Matter particle, No Dark Energy particle. But they all have an effect on what we call Gravity.

Triliton
Автор

What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles?

Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: "A theory that you can't explain to a bartender is probably no damn good." Ernest Rutherford

The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?

When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.

Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.

Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?

Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?

Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons

. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process.

Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.


Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge.

In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone. 1/137

1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface

137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.

The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)


How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?

SpotterVideo
Автор

Gravitational waves are ripples in space time

roberttarquinio
Автор

Our existence consists of an emulsion of void and positive and negative charges. The void goes to the void and we call it gravity. The void is the empty space between the atoms. So when you see an article of matter, there is mostly empty space with a sprinkling of positive and negative charges.
The void can't exist in the universe. It moves forward in time, dragging the charges with it.
An individual charge can't do much, but a great mass of them can be a man. Why can't an even greater mass be a god?

briankleinschmidt
Автор

There is only an appearance of deep time because information from the rest of the universe arrives faster because time runs faster between here and there and the distance isn’t as far as it appears to us to be.

JungleJargon
Автор

gravity is not a force then how the hell gravitons exits? can someone explain?

k_v
Автор

Gravitons are real, I am reliably told, however they do not directly mediate the effect called gravity. You see, particles begin their life in a natural state but later they decide to have a sex change or they work out a lot to become more muscular and change their identity. I like some of your graphics which hint at graviton dynamics.

JerryMlinarevic
Автор

Gravitons do not exist because gravitation is a manifestation of space time curvature and quantum gravitation is a manifestation of quantum space time curvature

roberttarquinio
Автор

About as real as magnetic monopoles....

hypercomms
Автор

Everyone thinks they're Einstein. Also the Earth is flat!

JoshVandever