AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB Review [Sapphire Pulse OC Benchmarks & Thermals]

Показать описание

f you're a 1080p gamer, there hasn't been much to upgrade to over the last couple of launches, but now AMD think they have the answer with the RX 7600, but is it any good?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
►Shopping Links◄
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Рекомендации по теме

Комментарии

Do you agree that it's just a bit lacklustre?

eTeknix

Your video really brightened my day, especially since I've just purchased a 7600, and it's quite pricey here in Brazil. But then again, that's the case with all GPUs around here. It was awesome to see that it holds up well in performance compared to other models.

weslei_wsd

Thank you for including cards like GTX1060 and 1070!!!

HEAD

It's not that bad for 270, but it'll be pretty good when it falls to 250 and below.

rollerr

one thing to remember, there have been a high inflation since the rx 6000 - rtx 3000 series. was released
btw does any body know if the AI core can hardware accelerated fsr3.0

fedepede

I'm not sure if it's just the rise in costs since covid is the main factor, of if there are others, but it feels like we're getting lots of mixed/stagnated messages. You had the 3090 rolled out in 2020 for "8k gaming card" last time round, the 7900xtx also as "8k gaming card" this time round. Though cards like the 1070/5700 have been pegged as high end 1080p cards with 8gb buffer, but they're of course years old now and the needle hasn't really moved in equivalent successor models. It seems Nvidia/AMD are both content to keep innovation low and prices high. Maybe Intel have entered the GFX market at the right time to give them both a kick in the rear end and get things moving the right way again for buyers.

KiltedCritic

High refresh 720p gpus are the new trend of 2023 😂.
Despite that, 2k gpus cant Handel the new AAA at 1080p

RayuDemon

So long as FPS are above 60 (TRUE frames, not including the fake smoothing generated frames) then photorealistic game TEXTURES will MASSIVELY improve your gaming experience, and better textures just need more VRAM without any real hit on FPS.
So, AMD would have been better off keeping the $30 "cut" and spending it to increase the VRAM to 16GB instead. Just about all YouTube channels are saying do NOT buy ANY GPU with less than 16GB VRAM in 2023 or you WILL regret it even with some current games, and most new triple A games as they come out, even at 1080p ultra settings! If you're on a low budget WAIT until July for the deals/competition to drive prices down and get a 16GB VRAM card!

NVidia is marketing the RTX4060Ti as the "ultimate 1080p experience" ; leaving aside the fact that mainstream 1080p gaming has been around for about 20 years and so resolutions that low is a joke so could never be called "mid-range", but even that low claim is not true because if you turn on "ultra settings", which of course includes Ray tracing, there are SEVERAL current games where it FAILS even at 1080p, with lows falling to 2 or 3 FPS frequently with stutters, making those games unplayable at "ultimate 1080p", proving NVidia to be mis-selling a crap card.

TimLongson