Episode #116 ... Structuralism and Mythology pt. 1

preview_player
Показать описание

Get more:

Find the podcast:

Be social:

Thank you for making the show possible. 🙂
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I've listened to alot of podcasts and YouTube videos on philosophy and your channel by far has been my favorite. You make philosophy relevant and easy to understand all without being pretentious. Thanks so much for your hard work. You deserve way more views and likes than what you have.

Zddee
Автор

Love your show. Thank you for all of your hard work. I can’t get enough and share with all of my friends and family. Thanks for all of your efforts.

thooks
Автор

0:52 is polarity inevitable here? perhaps a continuous interaction between culture molding individuals and individuals molding their cultures, all the time, everywhere?

elijaguy
Автор

I love Ferdinand de Saussure!! I’m so glad you mentioned him. But to me, he’s a linguist

keegster
Автор

"you didn't come out the womb waving at everyone"

teopasca
Автор

2 minutes in and already I have a problem with the idea that babies _don't wave_ first thing after leaving the womb. You also 'wave' when drowning as a reflexive attention cevice meant to indicate need or want of attention.

I'll keep liatening, but the idea that cutures 'make-up' or coerce subjects over co-opting natural or innate behaviors seems the opposite of how social structure emerges?

JH-jicj
Автор

The knowledge in myth is only hidden to the literal eyes of the modern folk, but there's nothing obtuse about it nor is it trying to be. It's the most direct way you can say something at that level of complexity.
Also, to call propaganda technics a kind of mythology is a gross reductionist misrepresentation.

FranciscoAlvRai
Автор

This is excellent work.
When I go to your site and click on the link to the transcript to episodes 116 and 117, the link takes me to the transcript for ep 113 (Frankfurt School) which is an episode I have listened to, and I did go to the transcript for some quote-mining :) I wonder if the problem is at my end? I'd really like to be able to extract a few lines from the transcripts to these Structuralist episodes, for the purposes of sharing, or as a bit of "clickbait" when I share the audio to my Facebook. More people should be following your podcasts, and I'd like to think that by sharing, I'm maybe helping to bring a few more listeners to this excellent channel.
Thanks, Steven.

mattgilbert
Автор

Yeah, I can see how this would be. We are free to swim however we want--but are confined to the limits of our pool (i.e., context of our birth).

christinemartin
Автор

This vocalises something I could never articulate my entire life

PeterZeeke
Автор

Didn't the pragmatist philosopher Charles Sanders Pierce also found a more complex and technical version of semiotics at the same time?

connerfields
Автор

I get waved at a lot...but curiously they’re all missing four fingers.

mobiditch
Автор

So, if I'm in a pool and I'm swimming it's not me swimming but the structural push of the water imposing it's cultural assumptions on me? :)

Автор

Interpretation of Mythology as a factual story. That is the thing with creationism. 😂

samthesomniator
Автор

"God decides he needs to shake the etch-a-sketch and Noah needs to build an ark".

connerfields
Автор

The way the presenter mangles the surname of Roland Barthes really grates on my ears; it should sound like Bart and not Bars because final S is nearly always silent in French words. This is on par with saying René Dess Cars. Next time he should spend the two minutes at most it takes to track down the right pronunciation online. It's on Wikipedia, for goodness sake!

brianharris
Автор

Stupid reasoning its obvious that any stupid person who meditates too much. Philosophers think to much and always never come to a final conclusion.

frederickanderson
Автор

this is completely bs, you can make up any meaning out of stories you like, from the most immoral story you can map so really valuable moral.

puneetsharma