Gospels=Anonymous- It wasn't by Matthew/Mark/Luke/John | Gay Jesus #shorts #history

Hi, Welcome this is not news. In fact scholars have known this since the Bible was compiled. We did not see these texts being named until Irenaeus in the 200's. Since the author's are not self identified, and written in year 90-120 after they died) they were assigned names to bestow upon them Apostolic authority.

Which is interesting to think about, why if this is so well known is it not talked about more in Modern American churches? Most of us do not learn this information until we start to deconstruct, or go to seminary school.

Further, why are there ACTUAL self identified books, such as the sayings gospel "The Book of Thomas' which is arguably the earliest Gospel written in 70 AD. Why did the church fathers name anonymous texts instead of choosing the actual signed ones with known authors? Odd, no?

Want sources, I got you sources:

Want part 2? I have it coming (insert here) in a few hours.

I ask that you debate kindly. Especially if you consider yourself a Christian. Really really be open to researching this topic. Just because something doesn't fit into YOUR denomination. Doesn't mean you should get mad and hostile. Just have a conversation, jeez.

Welcome to my archive! I am posting all my videos as shorts. One by one, follow along! Especially if you haven't seen the originals and are new here. (I promise the quality and content get better as I learned more about recording and pacing)

We are getting into the deeper theological topics. Buckle in. This is not your typical religious or spiritual channel, I encourage questions and critical thought! After all THIS is the time for christian deconstruction. We love all and this is a queer space.

I am available on all socials as 'Jegaysus'

Spread love. gAyMEN

[JeGaysus]

Adding the Descrip Here:

Hi, Welcome this is not news. In fact scholars have known this since the Bible was compiled. We did not see these texts being named until Irenaeus in the 200's. Since the author's are not self identified, and written in year 90-120 after they died) they were assigned names to bestow upon them Apostolic authority.

Which is interesting to think about, why if this is so well known is it not talked about more in Modern American churches? Most of us do not learn this information until we start to deconstruct, or go to seminary school.

Further, why are there ACTUAL self identified books, such as the sayings gospel "The Book of Thomas' which is arguably the earliest Gospel written in 70 AD. Why did the church fathers name anonymous texts instead of choosing the actual signed ones with known authors? Odd, no?

Want sources, I got you sources:


*Want part 2? I have it:*

I ask that you debate kindly. Especially if you consider yourself a Christian. Really really be open to researching this topic. Just because something doesn't fit into YOUR denomination. Doesn't mean you should get mad and hostile. Just have a conversation, jeez.

Welcome to my archive! I am posting all my videos as shorts. One by one, follow along! Especially if you haven't seen the originals and are new here.

We are getting into the deeper theological topics. Buckle in. This is not your typical religious or spiritual channel, I encourage questions and critical thought! After all THIS is the time for christian deconstruction. We love all and this is a queer space.

[johnjames]

Lord forgive them for they do not know what they do😢 My people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge

[chazm.]

For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.
They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths.
2 Timothy 4:3-4

[joshuajarod]

You ask for kind debate, but disrespect Jesus Christ.

[chrisapattee]

Yes. Only someone who is anti-Jesus would put this off as truth.

[JesusisHere]

One thing is for sure, Jesus is setting men free from the bondage of perverted desires and homosexuality. He set me free from sin 6 years ago in my room. And You're next

[spiderwebbz]

Manuscript and historical evidence nowhere in this video 💀 Bro said a whole lot of nothing 💀💀💀🔥🔥

[YourPalVal]

Yes this hurts my spirit. I was in an Open marriage and identified as Bi for a while. Jesus would never let me find a girlfriend, after 3 years of trying I was convicted and he pulled me out of my sin.

[davidwatters]

Jesus was NOT gay that is blasphemy! Repent and turn to the real Son of God.

[samueldelagarza]

This is very bold, as a young Christian I’m in no place to judge or say anything about this. but I feel something very wrong with this.

[zee-aaliyah]

Why don’t you mock Buddhist history, or Islam. That’s because the spirit influencing your interest to do this knows those religions are false. He only hates Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior bc He is The Way, The Truth, and The Life. You ever wonder why you don’t care to “disprove” those religions?

[littleandrew]

It’s interesting because the gospels contain extremely intricate details about the setting of the stories they tell (eg. Exact time of day, detailed timeline of where Jesus went and when he did so) and also personal conversations with Jesus. Furthermore, they record excruciating details about the crucifixion and the state Jesus was in leading up to it. It’s extremely unlikely that these could have been detailed by someone who wasn’t extremely close to Jesus (say, the 12 disciples)

It even says in John 21:24 “This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and wrote these things, and we know that his testimony is true.” The disciple referring to John himself, stating his authorship. Something to think about is that the gospel of John has similarities to Revelation, which John also wrote.

This video isn’t just false, it’s inherently dishonest.

[ray]

"To give them more authority " Yeah because someone like Mark had authority.

[krishnasaikia]

I am writing to those who have fallen for satan . Don't listen to anyone, read your bible and forgive every sinners but don't agree to the sin and the sinner

[yoshmonmanchakupas]

Ok, you wanted to share the information with others, I get it. However, why did have to mock Jesus Christ with such a sacrilegious name? If you want to talk with others, please, do it respectfully and without any kind of mocking.

[skither]

God loves you all! Also please turn to him before it’s too late! He really loves you he sent his only begotten son into the world to die on the Cross for your sins!

[jakefromstatefarm]

but the Lord laughs at the wicked, for he knows their day is coming.

[Thebiggdill]

You can mock Him all you want, but I promise you someday you'll bow before Him. Matthew 11:28-29

[famekobaine]

This'll be a tough one to explain at judgement 😅 lol mocking Jesus is crazy

[ellebrew]

Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.