Special counsel dismisses Trump’s notion classified documents are personal records

preview_player
Показать описание
Special counsel Jack Smith urged the judge in Donald Trump's classified documents case not to entertain the idea that Trump had any personal ownership over the materials in question.

ABC News Digital is your daily source of breaking national and world news, exclusive interviews and 24/7 live streaming coverage. ABC News is the home to the #1 evening newscast “World News Tonight” with David Muir, “Good Morning America,” “20/20,” “Nightline,” “This Week” with George Stephanopoulos, “ABC News Live Prime” with Linsey Davis, plus the daily news podcast “Start Here.”

Connect with ABC News on social media:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I have two dogs and if I smell poop in the house I guarantee there’s poop in the house!

seamoreplant
Автор

Jack Smith is getting a little to pushy. Maybe he should be removed from the case.

zzywudu
Автор

Is he really a special council? There is not a current justification to make him a special council. It will be thrown out at SCOTUS saying smith has no standing.

guybloom
Автор

Ok tell me the process to declare documents in classified. This case was over from the statt

chrisaustin
Автор

Why is judge Cannon still not barred from this case

joaniemiller
Автор

They take a long time to come up w the same conclusion they assume at the beginning

B
Автор

Obozo and Joeke did the EXACT SAME THING

neal
Автор

Jack smith is NOT the one who will decide the issues here. The judge has asked him to explain. HIS position. He cannot do that just by whining about how Trump’s position is “fundamentally flawed”. He needs to explain WHY Trump’s position is flawed and, in doing so, he must cite statutory code that says “although Bill Clinton did exactly that AND prevailed in DC District Court when he was challenged, Trump is not allowed to do it”. Problem is, there IS no statutory law that says that. And there definitely is no case law to support Smith’s position since the ONLY case law on this subject is none other than that Bill Clinton case which said HE could do it. So Smith is going to have to come up with a good excuse for WHY Bill Clinton can do but Donald Trump CAN’T. Jack Smith’s biggest problem here is that he overcharged. See, EVEN IF, Jack Smith could find a single sentence in the PDR that says a President can claim every document in his office as personal EXCEPT FOR documents marked “classified”, the Presidential Records Act has no provision that criminalizes acts that violate the Act. EVEN IF the PDR denied a President the right to keep classified documents, Jack Smith STILL could not charge Trump with a crime because the PDR does not say it is a crime to violate the Act. So…Jack Smith decided to call it ESPIONAGE! Problem there is, nothing in the Trump scenario that even remotely matches the definition of Espionage so…..how is he going to prove his case when he can not say “this is how the law defines espionage” and here is what Trump DID that legally qualifies as espionage! So now you know why Jack Smith is so frustrated.

MamaMC
Автор

Funny how they’re personal documents when it’s Bush or Obama or Biden….

crispinfornoff
Автор

Bill Clinton does it and its ok. Trump does it and yall cry.

mattrivers
Автор

As long as that ruling applies to all presidents.Then I guess it's ok

AwesomeBabyBoomer
Автор

Aww, sounds like the coin flipped, and democrats don't like the judge now

MrPcfixme
Автор

Presidential Records Act allows President Trump sole discretion on records he chooses to declassify and make personal

iamseanfire
Автор

Was it necessary to remind who appointed her ? Its okay, Why wasn't necessary to remind who appointed jacksmith

oliviern
Автор

So Special Council is a Judge, Jury and Executioner? Wow I didn't know a Special Council had that much power to basically call for the execution of someone they have been sent after denying them their Right to

TenmaStupidity
Автор

Rats don't like when they taste their own medicine

josephgeorgeejr
Автор

Special counsel cant dismiss anything ..

cindycliburn
Автор

It's Clinton's defence....so Trump is same ..

MrSmegfish
Автор

Evening the playing field, sounds fair!!

Alaskan
Автор

Let's see he skips 2 courts to get a hearing because he found/thought it would take to long and now he is complaining because a court is doing its dew diligent funny if you ask me.

jimc