Win Every Criminal Case From Now On!

Listen to this clip by the late Rick Shramm from the On Point II seminar telling you how corrupt state court is and what you can do about it to WIN every time!

Thank you and God bless you all!

[mickyboy]

I went to traffic court for a jaywalking ticket not too long ago. I had just learned about this 'legal fiction' stuff, so I decided to use this opportunity to test it. I sat in the gallery of the courtroom, and when the judge called my name I stayed seated and stated that i was representing the legal fiction of Anthony Forwood. The judge asked me to step forward into the court area. I asked if it was a common law court. He said no. I refused to budge, saying that I did not recognize his jurisdiction. A sheriff started to get up, asking the judge if he should arrest me. The judge stopped him and banged his gavel, dismissing the case.

[mwh]

if cops were truley public servants they would arrest every judge

[weytogoman]

I can't say what "needs" to be in a affidavit but here is what I carry ...

          LEGAL NOTICE

 



Notice to the principal is notice to the agent

Notice to the agent is notice to the principal


Be it known to all that I, Weyman P Cochran own a 1994 Toyota Camry vin # JT2GK12E4R0015601, it is private property consumer goods not equipment . As per UCC 9-109 (1)


Under USC Title 42 §1982. Property rights of citizens …, further evidences the above position that the City or State cannot take land because DO NOT have Jurisdiction. It states that federal or state
governments / agencies MUST have a monetary or proprietary
interest in your real private property in order to have
jurisdiction over it (if your land has no government
grant/funding or is not a subsidized government project, then
agencies have neither). DEMAND any public servant/said agencies
to provide the legal document that allows any federal or state
agency to supercede and/or bypass Title 42 USC §1982 and/or §1441. Title 42 §1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights …, further protects Declarant’s private property.



"... In one of the so-called elevator cases, that of Munn v. Illinois,
94 U. S. 113, [24 L. Ed. 77], it is said: 'When, therefore, one devotes
his property to a use in which the public have an interest, he in
effect grants to the public an interest in that use, and must submit to
be controlled by the public for the common good, to the extent of the
interest he has thus created.' But so long as he uses his property for
private use, and in the absence of devoting it to public use, the
public has no interest therein which entitles it to a voice in its
control.


"The use to which an item is put, rather than its physical characteristics,
determine whether it should be classified as ``consumer goods'' under UCC 9-109(1) or ``equipment'' under UCC 9-109(2)." Grimes v

Massey Ferguson,
Inc., 23 UCC Rep Serv 655; 355 So.2d 338 (Ala., 1978).

"Under UCC 9-109 there is a real distinction between goods purchased for personal use and those purchased for business use. The two are mutually
exclusive and the principal use to which the property is put should be
considered as determinative." James Talcott, Inc. v Gee, 5 UCC Rep Serv 1028; 266 Cal.App.2d 384, 72 Cal.Rptr. 168 (1968).


"The classification of goods in UCC 9-109 are mutually exclusive." McFadden
v Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 8 UCC Rep Serv 766; 260 Md 601, 273
A.2d 198 (1971).


“Men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, -‘life, liberty, and the pursuit
of happiness;’ and to ‘secure, ’ not grant or create, these rights, governments are instituted.
That property which a man has honestly acquired he retains full control of, subject to these
limitations: first, that he shall not use it to his neighbor’s injury, and that does not mean that he
must use it for his neighbor’s benefit: second, that if he devotes it to a public use, he gives to the
public a right to control that use; and third, that whenever the public needs require, the public may take it upon payment of due compensation.” Budd v. People of State of New York, 143 U.S. 517 (1892).

“Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than
according to the means by which they are propelled.” Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20. And;

“In view of this rule a statutory provision that the supervising officials “may”
exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a commercial basis
means that they “must” exempt them.” State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 6
C.J.S. section 94 page 581.


As far as having it registered ...


“A vehicle not used for commercial activity is a “consumer goods”, ...it is
NOT a vehicle that is
REQUIRED to be REGISTERED under this code
“Passenger vehicles which are not used for the
transportation of persons for hire, compensation or
profit, and housecars, are not commercial vehicles”
“a vanpool vehicle is not a commercial vehicle.”
and; NOT type of vehicle required to be registered and “use tax” paid of which the tab is evidence of receipt of the tax.” Bank of Boston vs Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A2d 484, UCC PP 9-109.14. And;

“It is held that a tax upon common carriers by motor vehicles is based upon a  by reasonable classification, and does not involve any unconstitutional discrimination, although it does not apply to private vehicles, or those used the owner in his own business, and not for hire.” Desser v. Wichita, (1915) 96 Kan. 820; Iowa Motor Vehicle Asso. v. Railroad Comrs., 75 A.L.R. 22.

What must happen …


In view of this rule a statutory provision that the supervising officials “may” exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a commercial basis means that they “must” exempt them. State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 6 C.J.S. section 94 page 581.





The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this the day of in the year ___

[jacojonker]

we need more ppl like yall in society.I want to do this too, we are not crimminals.ppl needs to stand up against government harassment.

[ironsharpensironcouncil]

"i don't answer questions" and silence

[TruthFairy]

A judge can't enter a plea on your behalf if you refuse to enter one, he's practicing law from behind the bench and it's not legal.

[emanonymous]

Error! Does not compute! Does not compute! [Judges head explodes]

[tooshay]

"I'll take Things the public school system will never teach for $1, 000 Alex". Love the info. A reenactment would so help with visuals of the affidavit (example) and how to submit said paperwork.

[Gadsby]

Yes it works in criminal courts as well. Never enter the BAR (stay seated in the gallery) or answer their questions unless it is with a question. Ask if it’s a criminal matter. Their answer will be yes. There are two types of criminal charges 1. In Equity or 2. In Law. (Say: as As I am the beneficiary, as well as, the Grantor of the JOHN DOE Trust. Who is the injured party in this matter? I ask the alleged judge, prosecutors, police officers et centers if he/ she/they have a claim against the John Doe Trust or if they have been injured by the John Doe Trust. If they say the STATE is the injured party. Then for the record as I am the beneficiary here holding court in good faith for settling any claims against the John Doe Trust bring forth the STATE for cross examination otherwise it’s here say and this matter is discharged. The prosecutor will say that he/she is there representing the STATE. I say: that I object and protest. Do you have first hand knowledge in this matter? His/ her answer is always NO. Is the STATE here for cross examination. The answer is no as the STATE is a fiction. Then for the record this matter is not in Equity then it must be in Law. If it’s in Law then as I am the beneficiary in the matter of the John Doe Trust. We demand the original International Contract bearing wet ink autographs be entered into the record otherwise this matter is discharged as there is no injured party nor is there an International Contract in dispute. We authorize My Honor/the alleged judge) to pay any verifiable valid claim that has been entered into the record as he/she is the appointed fiduciary with a duty and obligation for protecting our property in this matter. This matter is discharged nunc Pro tunc ab initio. Again never enter their BAR, never testify and only answer questions with a question. Object and protest to anything that they declare unless it’s in your favor. Yes I have done this myself and it works. Ps: anything that comes out of an prosecuting attorney mouth object to as its always here say. Ask over and over if they have first hand knowledge in this matter or are they an injured party in this matter or if they have a claim against the John Doe Trust or You. Sincerely Morpheus

[victor-fowler]

If the judge enters a plea for someone, they are practicing law from the bench. And that is against the law, and you can sue that judge in the next highest court.

[triciaabney]

Those 99 people that are on top here that do not like this video are probably attorneys

[mpb]

Loads of trials move forward without the defendant's participation. You will only pick up contempt charges.

[stopdemockery]

A friend's son, who claims to be in with the ill-umiNaughty, appeared in court for a speeding ticket. When called he said, “I, (his name), am the living beneficiary of the trust and I appoint you, (the judge) a public servant, as trustee and instruct you to conclude these proceedings in a manner that most benefits me and pay me....” At which point the judge interrupted him, dismissed the charges, brought down the gavel and quickly left the courtroom.

[kradikt]

all countries need to ditch the government systems

[tongmaa]

Look! There is a misunderstanding being promoted, here. Not in the video but with people saying that Traffic Court is a "Common law court!" *IT IS NOT!* And, the video clearly says that it is a *Tribunal.* That means that the "Jurisdiction" is a being held under Military/Maritime law, and they identify that by having an Army, gold fringed flag in all of that type of courtroom: Military/Maritime Commercial law.

Even that is a Fraud, since the state, county and city use One party contract law, and where you are the only signor of that "contract" and the state demands "damages" for infractions of the supposed contract as the injured party ... who did not sign any of those "contracts."

"Common law" courts are held under Constitutional law, and playing "Absent" won't work on those cases, because it is either a common law commercial jurisdiction (two party or more to the subject Contract for damages, ) or a criminal jurisdiction, and where an actual crime was alleged; e.g., murder, felonious assault, armed robbery, and even shop-lifting, among a host of other criminal offenses too numberous to name.

When you see a gold fringed flag, do not enter the court, and since it is obviously a military tribunal, but using Maritime commercial law fraudulently....

[mjgarrettify]

If judge enters a plea for you, isn't that practicing law from the bench which is illegal because the judge is only there to hear the evidence.

[djkaneck]

Half correct. I had those same Private tags on what I thought l was my car but the police took/towed the car. I was charged with 8 criminal offense. I beat all of them and expunged the charges because of my affidavit. I was not allowed to get the car back because if it’s in an all caps name, that is STATE property.

[JohnWick-kvbz]

I wonder if this will still work the same in 2024. i have a case for pre trial shit that I challenged the jurisdiction with the first appearance. my court date is dec. 13, 2024.

[It-was-an-accident]

I have been waiting for years to watch all these “victories”. Everyone be sure to post your videos, so others can be witness to your success. 👍👍

[repentandknowjesus]

If you know what your doing the Judge will respect that.