Physics 62 Special Relativity (30 of 43) The Relativistic Triangle

preview_player
Показать описание

In this video I will explain the relativistic triangle - an ingenious method of graphically representing the relationship between the momentum, the rest mass energy, the total energy, and the kinetic energy of a particle at relativistic speeds.

Next video in the Special Relativity series can be seen at:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This reminds me of Minkowski's contribution to Einstein; turning algebra into geometry & trig. Does that make sense to anyone?

chavab
Автор

I would in no way classify myself as especially smart. Maybe slightly above average at best - and I independently arrived at this over the span of a couple of weeks recently.
This just sort of happened because I knew the pythagorean theorem and I knew any increase in spatial velocity comes at the cost of time dilation, and so any increase in spatial velocity means a decrease in temporal velocity. That told me we should be able to represent time dilation in terms of a right triangle, and use the pythagorean theorem and trig to model the relationship and derive the ratio of spatial and temporal velocities, which at the time (like a couple months ago now I guess) I didn't know was the lorentz factor. I hadn't even heard of minkowski space, but I knew spacetime is a 4D geometry according to Einstein though..

Anyway, point is - you don't necessarily have to be some sort of genius to do this. I don't think I am, hell, I barely scraped through in school. But I'm curious about stuff, and I learn by associating new information to information I already know.

Lleanlleawrg
Автор

Why we draw that arc can you please explain?

kinjalpatel
Автор

why we are not substituting K.E for total energy while calculating cos(theta)? But you did that for calculating sin(theta)... I couldn't get it can u explain?

ammudhakshayani
Автор

I really appreciate how you explained it in the simplest way possible. Also when you expressed v in terms of gamma, I don't know if you noticed but if you substitute 1/gamma by cos(theta) and simplify, you get v = csin(theta) which is kind of fascinating. Please let me know if this is right.

alistairfernandes