ED's Power Of Arrest, Twin Conditions For Bail Upheld: Supreme Court's PMLA Judgment Explained

preview_player
Показать описание
LiveLaw brings you the latest legal news and updates from India and beyond.
We are into fact based legal journalism.
Endeavour of LiveLaw is to play an active role for a transparent and democratic legal ecosystem, in the larger public interest.

This video is an intellectual property belonging to LiveLaw Media Pvt Ltd. Any unauthorised usage of this video/script in any format is prohibited and will be subject to prosecution.

Live Law app is India's fastest legal news app that will keep you updated on the latest law/legal news from India and across the world. Download now.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

In short, "Guilty until proven innocent."

*Slow claps 👏*

totalme
Автор

I have a serious issue with any law that presumes guilt and makes it incumbent upon the accused to prove his/her innocence. Also, there has to be a preset period of custody for questioning and bail should be granted automatically after the lapse of the detention period. The process should not be allowed to be prolonged such that the process itself becomes a punishment even without a conviction. In all such cases that do not result in a conviction, the courts should award heavy compensation in favour of the victim at the cost of the prosecution.

mantrik
Автор

This is a very disturbing judgement, how is no one afraid that the executive has so much power in this statute, fundamental rights and individual liberties be damned before this "special" statute. I know that money laundering is a heinous crime and criples the social, economic and polital fabric of a nation and is not to be looked lightly. The manner in which this law is enforced shows glimpses of a Police State(sorry ED officials are not "police" in this "special" statute).
I don't think that the executive is wrong to have so much power, all I ask for is transparency in the mechanism so that we don't live in fear.

swanay
Автор

Very important updates...thnx. Ms. bhaumik

chetansamariya
Автор

😍😍😍OMG I didn't hear a single word from the news.

ashwinshiva
Автор

Kha kar will get RS seat or other govt post. well done. shabaash

nowonami
Автор

Basically uapa also put the burden on the accused. When sc put a pause on that .
Now, this law also put the burden of proof on the accused.
Perfect. In India process is the punishment.

trickyabb
Автор

PMLA should be amended to protect the violation of human rights of a person arrested on suspicion, requiring ED to prove whether the suspects have committed a crime or not. No one shall be arrested and questioned on the testimony of an approver. No one should be arrested on suspicion unless ED proves any wrongdoing in court. Otherwise the party in power at the center will misuse the ED.

paulravindran
Автор

We would like to have a detailed interview with Senior Advocate Satyapal Jain on the subject ELECTION LAWS IN INDIA 🇮🇳

RaviRanjan-vfsf
Автор

please try to explain these criticcal case in the language which is understanable by the layman . For exmaple hinglish

robinkumar
Автор

Thank you for the video maam
Can you make one more video on SARFESI ACT? and recent judgements related to the acts?

Himanshu
Автор

I was
Never
Admire to
Narendra Modi
Since
His
Government
Performance
Many
Intellectual
Not
Happy
Habit of
Telling
Lies
Narendra Modi
Culture
For
Vote
Many
Big
Blunder
Narendra Modi
Did
PLI
Not very successful
Planning
The day I
Came to
Know
Narendra Modi
Taken my technology patent
That day
I understand
Charector
Of
Narendra Modi

arunavadasgupta
Автор

POLLUTED HAND SHOULD NOT TOUCH THE PURE FOUNTAIN OF JUSTICE.

sheikibrahim
Автор

I have gone through these videos several times. No doubt, it's a good idea and you are representing it in a quite delicate way but “your name" and the way you are articulating it ... that's on another level 😂

abhilashpattnaik
Автор

when ed is not police, then what about power of arrest ??

namitha
Автор

English question:- How to take husband property.. Tell me what is the legal scope for a childless woman after 15 years of marriage to steal all or some of her husband's property. Also husband alive and separate from me.🙋!

🙋 கேள்வி :- ஒரு பெண்க்கு திருமணம் ஆகி 15 வருடம் ஆனது குழந்தை இல்லை. கணவனின் சொத்து அனைத்தையும் அல்லது கொஞ்சமாவது வாங்க வேண்டும் என்ன செய்வது சொல்லுங்கள்? என்னிடம் இருந்து கணவர் பிரிந்து இருக்கிறார்.

chandrasekar
Автор

Plz keep it simple naa, we are not law students…

lostsoul
Автор

My sister mahra pyrar on le 6 my lakki monipur pengang poste rongmy naga larke butifulc army cam kah pas ak cahar ha laf citkah pas ⚔️🇮🇳💺💘💯✔️

TahrahulHussain-jfge
Автор

I see your videos but i confusion😵
Your language but i like your voices ma'am ✅
Because I learning English 🤍✅

Ankitsscian
Автор

Interesting channel but everything is presented in such a boring way! Please don't use so many big words. Me not smart enough to understand but still need to be educated about my rights 😄

divyanthjayaraj