filmov
tv
Does Alzheimer's Disease Disprove the Soul?
Показать описание
The existence or non-existence of an immaterial mind or soul has been debated for thousands of years.
The existence of some sort of soul has been championed by thinkers separated by hundreds of years. For example, a soul figures into the postulations of the ancient Greek philosopher Plato as well as the metaphysical schema of French thinker René Descartes, often called the "father of modern philosophy."
It is not without its critics and skeptics, however.
Many recent thinkers have proposed that, in the face of advancements in neuroscience, as well as the stark reality of devastating brain diseases and dementias such as Alzheimer's Disease, belief in a non-physical soul is no longer tenable.
A main argument -- advanced by numerous philosophers, including Patricia Churchland, Paul Draper, and Paul Edwards (whose work is cited in the video) -- proposes that, since memory and personality are so obviously dependent on the brain, there is little room left for a "soul" to play.
Others vehemently disagree.
For example, the Nobel-Prize-winning neurophysiologist Sir John Eccles proposed that the brain was an instrument of the soul, similarly to how a musical instrument is merely a tool of a musician.
In this video, I try to provide a brief overview of some of the relevant issues.
Disclaimer: As stated, the question of the soul has vexed people for millennia. I am under no misapprehensions about the possibility of "resolving" this issue, here. Much has been left out of my introductory -- and even superficial -- discussion. Viewers interested in further research should consult standard, philosophical references (such as Stanford's Encylopedia of Philosophy and the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy) as well as collections of the works of the great thinkers of history who have tackled this difficult, but fascinating, question.
See, also, my written work at:
The existence of some sort of soul has been championed by thinkers separated by hundreds of years. For example, a soul figures into the postulations of the ancient Greek philosopher Plato as well as the metaphysical schema of French thinker René Descartes, often called the "father of modern philosophy."
It is not without its critics and skeptics, however.
Many recent thinkers have proposed that, in the face of advancements in neuroscience, as well as the stark reality of devastating brain diseases and dementias such as Alzheimer's Disease, belief in a non-physical soul is no longer tenable.
A main argument -- advanced by numerous philosophers, including Patricia Churchland, Paul Draper, and Paul Edwards (whose work is cited in the video) -- proposes that, since memory and personality are so obviously dependent on the brain, there is little room left for a "soul" to play.
Others vehemently disagree.
For example, the Nobel-Prize-winning neurophysiologist Sir John Eccles proposed that the brain was an instrument of the soul, similarly to how a musical instrument is merely a tool of a musician.
In this video, I try to provide a brief overview of some of the relevant issues.
Disclaimer: As stated, the question of the soul has vexed people for millennia. I am under no misapprehensions about the possibility of "resolving" this issue, here. Much has been left out of my introductory -- and even superficial -- discussion. Viewers interested in further research should consult standard, philosophical references (such as Stanford's Encylopedia of Philosophy and the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy) as well as collections of the works of the great thinkers of history who have tackled this difficult, but fascinating, question.
See, also, my written work at:
Комментарии