Roger Crisp on Parfit's Influence in the 'Real World'

preview_player
Показать описание
In this informal interview with documentary-maker Michael Parfit, Professor Roger Crisp (Philosophy, Oxford) explains why it's not an easy task for philosophers to have an influence in the 'real world' - though he thinks philosophy certainly produces imperceptible benefits in the 'real world'.
  1. Uehiro Oxford Institute Channel
  2. Practical Ethics Channel
  3. Katrien Devolder
  4. Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics
  5. Philosophy
  6. ethics
Рекомендации по теме
Roger Crisp on 0:03:42

Roger Crisp on Parfit's Influence in the 'Real World'

Roger Crisp discusses 0:06:27

Roger Crisp discusses Derek Parfit's metaethics

Roger Crisp on 0:05:02

Roger Crisp on Derek Parfit's life and philosophy

Roger Crisp on 0:06:23

Roger Crisp on Derek Parfit's place in British moral philosophy

Roger Crisp on 0:07:31

Roger Crisp on Parfit, Future Generations and Theory X

Professor Roger Crisp 0:06:31

Professor Roger Crisp defends Aristotle

An interview with 0:03:16

An interview with Professor Roger Crisp, editor of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

Jeff McMahan on 0:03:23

Jeff McMahan on how Derek Parfit's work will affect humanity

Fried Philosophy 3: 0:05:28

Fried Philosophy 3: Identity (Me, Us, Parfit) Doesn't Matter

Jeff McMahan on 0:05:40

Jeff McMahan on how Derek Parfit's work changed philosophy

Julian Savulescu on 0:02:04

Julian Savulescu on Parfit's mark on the world

Derek Parfit: 'Why 0:39:48

Derek Parfit: 'Why our identity is not what matters'

Derek Parfit 0:17:42

Derek Parfit

Julian Savulescu: bringing 0:06:24

Julian Savulescu: bringing Parfit's common morality into the practical world

Dr Henry Merivale 0:06:50

Dr Henry Merivale defends Hume

The non-identity problem: 0:16:49

The non-identity problem: Q&A | Derek Parfit | EAGxOxford 2016

V Neurophilo - 0:47:11

V Neurophilo - Roger Crisp

Peter Singer on 0:46:56

Peter Singer on Good Lives, Good Futures, and Good Philosophical Writing

Jeff McMahan on 0:06:02

Jeff McMahan on the philosophical basics of Parfit's work

Jeff McMahan on 0:06:17

Jeff McMahan on why Derek Parfit was saintly

Peter Singer - 0:18:00

Peter Singer - Ethics, Uncertainty & Moral Progress

Derek Parfit: The 0:07:43

Derek Parfit: The Repugnant Conclusion

Equality As Comparative 0:55:45

Equality As Comparative Fairness with Larry Temkin

Matthew Adler (Duke) 0:40:12

Matthew Adler (Duke) “The structure of luck prioritarianism”

Комментарии
Автор

I've pointed a number of introspective/thoughtful people to SEP articles on philosophical themes that always held their interest and that they had no idea were extensively and formally discussed or written about elsewhere. Most of these people couldn't so much as get through a quarter of those articles and follow along. If the average philosopher responds to this by suggesting that the fault lies with those introspective/thoughtful people who are philosophically untrained, widening the appeal of formal philosophy becomes that much more difficult a task.

Overspecialization + Publish vs. Perish = an awful way to cultivate interest from outsiders and non-philosophers.

No_Avail