How To Evaluate Limits of Radical Functions | Calculus

preview_player
Показать описание
This Calculus video tutorial explains how to evaluate limits with radical functions such as square root functions.

How To Evaluate Limits From a Graph:

Evaluating Limits By Factoring:

Limits of Rational Functions :

Limits of Radical Functions:

Limits of Trigonometric Functions:

___________________________________
How To Find The Limit at Infinity:

Infinite Limits + Vertical Asymptotes:

Limits at Infinity With Radicals:

Limits of Absolute Value Functions:

Limits of Composite Functions:

The Squeeze Theorem:

____________________________________
Limits and Logarithms:

Limits of Exponential Functions:

Piecewise Functions - Limits:

3 Step Continuity Test:

Continuity and Differentiability:

Limits - Test Review:

_____________________________________
Final Exams and Video Playlists:

Full-Length Videos and Worksheets:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Dude you are by far the most excellent teacher and I’m blown away by the vastness of your knowledge! Thanks man!!!

uvaldoandIsaaclopez
Автор

Thank you so much. I was having a little difficulty with my math 203 assignment but your explanation has given me a clearer understanding of the problem. May God bless you. 🙏

gregoryg.philips
Автор

Question: How do you know when to take the conjugate of the numerator or the denominator?

ashtonmeyer
Автор

Great teacher! thanks a lot brother, I spent like 2 hours trying to find examples like these.

kevingarita
Автор

MR. Organic Chemistry Tutor, thank you for Evaluating Limits of Radical Functions using algebra tricks and tools. Limits problems in Calculus uses a heavy dose of algebra.

georgesadler
Автор

Thanks a lot 🙏 but is it necessarily compulsory to multiply top and bottom with the conjugate with the denominator?

KingGregforever
Автор

My mentor thank you very much may God 🙏 bless you sir.

alphasaffi
Автор

So grateful for you. Thank you so much. That was of great help...🌸

phathiscreations
Автор

this example is quiet hard:( . In some parts, the fraction was multiplied with the numerator and other parts were multiplied with the denominator

ladymichellebarlisan
Автор

are you able to explain how to show the limit of 1/x as x approaches 0 does not exist using the e-d definition? I feel like it would be pretty good to look at since the function seems so simple yet so difficult to prove DNE, i've been stuck on it for so long.

Ivan-qvxh
Автор

Can you also have used l'hopital's rule?

hluu
Автор

Are we meant to multiply by the numerators conjugate or the denominators own?

freeguylota
Автор

Calculus got me watching ts on my breaks

efloof
Автор

In the first example, can you instead use the numerator as a conjugate or should it always be the conjugate of the denominator when there are radicals in a fraction?

CaptainEchoPH
Автор

Why did (√7-x)(+2) equalled to +2√7-x ?

unkownlast
Автор

What sorcery is this? Lol I was confused by a similar question involving the replacement rule, limits, and square roots. Thanks.

Cloud
Автор

Is multiplying by conjugate strictly for square roots?

RaffaelloLorenzusSayde
Автор

I'm watching this because im bored

deathmonk
Автор

Your the best my teacher is way too fast

malakayman
Автор

... An alternative way of solving this limit as follows: lim(x-->3)((sqrt(12 - x) - 3)/(sqrt(7 - x) - 2)), Multiply the limit by ((7 - x) - 4)/((12 - x) - 9) (= 1/1) and split the limit in two limits according to the multiplication limit law: lim(AB) =lim(A)lim(B) as follows: [ lim(x-->3)((sqrt(12 - x) - 3)/((12 - x) - 9)) ][ lim(x-->3)((7 - x) - 4)/(sqrt(7 - x) - 2)) ], Treat (12 - x) - 9 and (7 - x) - 4 as differences of two squares: (12 - x) - 9 = (sqrt(12 - x) - 3)(sqrt(12 - x) + 3) and (7 - x) - 4 = (sqrt(7 - x) - 2)(sqrt(7 - x) + 2), After cancelling the common factors (sqrt(12 - x) - 3) and (sqrt(7 - x) - 2) of respectively limit #1 and #2 we obtain the final solvable limit form of: [ lim(x-->3)(1/(sqrt(12 - x) + 3)) ][ lim(x-->3)(sqrt(7 - x) + 2) ] = [ 1/(3 + 3) ][ 2 + 2 ] = (1/6)(4) = 4/6 = 2/3 ... Hoping this way is also appreciated a bit (less algebra)... Thank you for all your valuable math efforts, Jan-W

jan-willemreens