Introduction to Mixed Methods in Impact Evaluation

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thank you for such concrete, simple,
and useful introduction

ligiamalagondesalazar
Автор

I had to miss the webinar due to poor internet connection in the field, but its great to access it from the web and learn more about the mixed methods. Thanks to Interaction and Michael Bamberger.

DeepakPaudel
Автор

It is incorrect to state that RCT does not consider issues of implementation. A key issue in implementation relates to when random assignment to treatment differs from actual treatment, as he provided as example. However, this issue is addressed during evaluation by estimating local average treatment effect and intention-to-treat rather than average treatment effect. And in analysis, this generalizes to instrumental variable technique of two-stage least squares, rather than just OLS. You need to condemn quantitative impact evaluation just because you don't understand how it works. In a mixed methods approach, both quantitative and qualitative aspects are related and that is what we should be emphasizing. The qualitative aspect can provide an in-depth understanding of the quantitative results. Indeed, I think the quantitative aspect answers the question of 'what works', whilst the qualitative aspect answers the question of 'why' and in what context' of evaluation question. .

damiolajide
Автор

This is a fantastic resource however, unfortunately the webinar Q&A's and annexes are not available on InterActions website, despite the links. Hoping this can be fixed.

wyldwon
Автор

i did not understand how hypotheses are not defined until data collection begins? can anyone please help me here

mohsinhaq
Автор

Very niec for project implementation  Rajesh Shoni Nepal

rajeshshoni
visit shbcf.ru