Spring Boot versus Quarkus

preview_player
Показать описание

Is it possible to write slim, light, fast boot time, low-memory footprint Java applications? Using a Java framework provides reusable pre-written code templates that help speed up development and deployment - but which framework is best? In this video, Cedric Clyburn compares two major frameworks in use today: Spring Boot and Quarkus.

#quarkus #springboot #java #javaframeworks #redhat
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

When you try out Quarkus, you will have hard time going back to Spring because of the developer joy, which boils down to normally working instant reload, continuous testing, testcontainers and dev UI. The main concepts are basically the same, just different keywords.

Vanuatoo
Автор

Spring Boot is only one facet of the Spring Framework, I think that would have been a better comparison, particularly with Security, Spring AI, Spring Cloud, Spring Reactive, Test Containers, Modulith, Graalvm Virtual threading etc..

Spring has a huge community, . It's open source, well tested and evolving massively. It also keeps up with Java SDK Development,

I still think Boot is an erroneous comparison, it is only a part of the Spring Ecosystem. Too many comments here, are assuming Spring and Spring-Boot are one in the same.

sefumies
Автор

I can't really seeing myself going back to using Spring Boot unless I'm forced to. Quarkus is so good in terms of developer productivity and performance.🔥

Douglas-Allen
Автор

Can one build web applications using purely KOTLIN & KOBWEB with QUARKUS? Or, must I use strictly JAVA?

MrAverageViewer
Автор

Is Spring boot version > 3.2 having similar capabilities in terms of performance when compared to Quarkus ?

shlvfsl
Автор

Well, thanks for this. i am still learning spring boot

AdamsProgrammer
Автор

i wonder why still using java 8 while there is jdk 20 and same here modern quarkus and some still using spring boot

wasimdorboz
Автор

Using graal VM on SpringBoot match Quarkus performance?

khalidhamid
Автор

After watching this video I realised that I can now understand the jargon now 1:43 May be I have become a Java developer 😂

UPlusPlus
Автор

Was hoping this was a bit more objective.

adambickford
Автор

If Jaotc didn't killed all java applications would have been native

ebuzertahakanat
Автор

The sound of a marker on that board is very unpleasant.

e
Автор

They both don't fit, too many layers of abstraction stacked on top of each other. Now the best choice is either Helidon, or with ten lines of code you can embed Jetty, Tomcat, or Undertow and easily write services with the JAX-RS standard.
It would have been better if Quarkus had initially thought like the Helidon 4 team. Also, let's not fool ourselves, the speed of startup is not important at all compared to all other important parameters.

ahuramazda
Автор

woah, and here i thought Spring Boot is based on CoC (Convention over Configuration), while the start states its opinionated

akashagarwal
Автор

I think Java needs to go the way of the dinosaur personally.

davejones