🔥#MESScience 2: Vortex Math Part 1: Number Theory and Modular Arithmetic

Показать описание

In #MESScience 2 I cover a relatively unknown concept called “Vortex Math” or “Vortex Based Mathematics” which was founded by Marko Rodin. Vortex math is based upon the continual summing of digits of a number until a single digit is obtained and then using this principle to develop patterns with basic arithmetic in both 2D as a modular clock and grid of numbers; and in 3D as a torus with spiral geometry. Marko and many other proponents of vortex math both deify and reify numbers the resulting patterns by viewing the the abstractness of numbers as concrete physical reality.

In this video I go through the fundamentals of vortex math and then generalize to any base number system. This process involves an extensive review of number theory and modular arithmetic in order to understand the underlying patterns, symmetry, and causation that govern all of the patterns that arise in vortex math.

In future parts I will look to examine the 2D number grid, 3D vortex torus, and more advanced patterns that tie into the Fibonacci sequence and more.

CORRECTION: @ 5:26:45 - Halving and doubling both depend on the number system, but halving depends on the relative value of 10/2.

The topics covered in this video are listed below with their time stamps.

- @ 0:00 - Intro
- @ 1:05 – MES Research Note
- @ 1:54 - Note on Part 1
- @ 2:22 – Topics to Cover

1. - @ 6:12 - Introduction to Vortex Math
- @ 8:30 - Marko Rodin's Claims and Discovery
- 36:36 - Fallacy of Reification
2. @ 42:12 - Overview of Base Number Systems
- @ 42:48 - The Number 0 and 10 in General Number Systems
- @ 50:13 - Converting Number Systems
3. @ 1:12:34 - Summing of Integer Digits and the Remainder After Division
- @ 1:24:02 - Division by Largest Unique Digit and Repeating Digits After Decimal Place
- @ 1:33:57 - MES Convention: Vortex Sum vs Digit Sum
- @ 1:35:04 - The Modulo Operation (Determining Remainders)
- @ 1:38:48 - Proof: The Vortex Digit Sum is Equal to the Mod (base - 1)
- @ 1:48:59 - Using Base 10 to Determine Vortex Sum of Different Bases
4. @ 2:09:02 - Multiplying a Number and Its Vortex Sum Result in the Same Vortex Sum
- This is the Causation of Most Vortex Patterns
- @ 2:42:49 - Modular Arithmetic
5. @ 2:48:03 - Vortex Doubling Patterns
- @ 3:00:13 - Symmetry of Number Systems Causes the Doubling Patterns
6. @ 3:31:38 - Factors that Govern Vortex Patterns
- @ 3:32:02 - Even and Odd Base Number Systems
- @ 3:44:30 - Size of Base Number System
- @ 4:06:59 - Synchronization of Doubling Pattern and Size of Base
- @ 4:23:03 - Odd Base Number Systems Can't Synchronize With Doubling
- @ 4:35:00 - Starting Point of Pattern
- @ 4:47:21 - Multiplying Factor
7. @ 5:18:48 - Vortex Halving Patterns
- @ 5:26:45 - Halving Depends on the Base Number System (See CORRECTION)
- @ 5:36:20 - Converting Halving into Multiplication
- @ 5:43:46 - Halving is the Reverse of Doubling
- @ 6:01:10 - Vortex Halving Doesn't Work for Odd Base Number Systems?
- @ 6:14:07 - Powers of Ten Pattern
- @ 6:38:49 - General Division to Multiplication Vortex Conversion
- @ 6:47:30 - Dealing with "Irregular" Division
8. @ 7:18:26 - Polar Number Pairs and Addition
- @ 8:02:50 - Different Base Number Systems
9. @ 8:42:00 - Summary
10. @ 9:45:05 - Conclusions
11. @ 9:47:07 - Future Parts

Stay Tuned for #MESScience 3…

Download Video Notes:

Related Videos:

------------------------------------------------------

Рекомендации по теме

Комментарии

In #MESScience 2, I go over Part 1 of an obscure concept called “vortex math” or “vortex based mathematics” and which involves me doing an extensive deep-dive into modular arithmetic and number theory to understand the resulting patterns.

mes

wow i got into vortex math a few years ago, but have never gone this deep, well done. love how extensive your work always is! this is how it should be done! better get cracking on my 9hr study session haha. thanks for taking your time to make these videos!

mercedesayris

Im 15 and this video has got me so interested and intrigued into vortex maths thanks a lot for making these videos

apha

Sir I'm finding something related to time how to time work, time roots and time window please help.

abhijeetday

I'm assuming Volks Wagen knew this when coming up with their logo? 17:00

woodywoodpool

I found it interesting that no matter what base is used in any of the complete systems (prime numbers squared) you still get opposite traveling multiples for whatever pairs add up to the parent number. In base 10, any pair adding to 9 moves in exactly opposite directions. IE multiples of 2 => [2, 4, 6, 8, 1, 3, 5, 7] and multiples of 7 => [7, 5, 3, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2]. But the 9 itself is only reflective of itself. This is solidifying my belief that the universe really is a simulated construct operating on a quantum OS with a trinary bit system => 1, 0, or the superposition of 1 && 0. I believe this is representative of the 9, 25 in base 26, 49 in base 50 and so on... This pattern is evident in ever single base system used. Please double check what I am saying, and point out if/when/where I am wrong, but my basic checking in the different bases has been solid so far. Curious to hear thoughts on the matter.

aaronely

it is an amazing article. May I ask how can get a pdf file of it?

moemo

No idea when I subbed to this! Haha, good luck guys.

jamesmurillo

Awesome deep dive! 👍🏻 thank you! And thanx for the Rodin demystification but still holding up the flag, that numbers seem to more than just countable figures.would be interesting to see how this would Vortx Math goes together with geometry - as there form and figure meshes up and are no more only abstract concepts. Espc. in regard of the platonic five. Great job 👏

willywalter

Any idea on how to use the Rodin coils for therapeutic and healing purposes??? I have 2 Rodin coils from Russia and have NO clue how to use them. Any ideas or reference links PLEASE???? Thanks a lot in advance!!!

luisamedina

I thank you so much for this, would love to see more ❤️

zeshan

There's so much to vortex math. Its in the fibonacci sequence and many other unknown sources.

naterbator

Finally have been schooled on why math is important. 😶 I'm on a path of discovering the truth and even though I hardly registered a word you said... Your work was brilliant and it made sense the way you explained it, which by the way is still bouncing back and forth in my head. 🙄 👍👍

livingforgodtodayandalways

Hey man, I'm 40 mins into this and intend to watch more over the coming week. I always felt Rodin was a basically a white wash where they could dispose of experimental and theoretical evidence related to the role of hyper torroids as they pertain to "scalar" energy. (kinda like the f l a t earth movement is used to conveniently dispose of all anomalous data relating to relativity). You would be wise to take a look at some of the work from MFMP related to hyper toroids specifically "O-Day - The Bagel Game - the maths" and there role in creating stable self re-inforcing EM standing waves. It is very disturbing how Rodin has taken what I consider to be correct meta-physical diagrams "black white hole torus diagram" and say his coil is doing that, when in reality I don't think his coil can't do it because it isn't a high enough order torus. This geometry is theoretically discussed by Wheeler in the 50's and is referenced in many other subsequent academic documents. This comment is in no way an attempt to defend vortex math, which I feel on the surface is elegant and pulls in many metaphysical concepts, but I feel is ultimately a racket and just results in people laughing at them. I think there is a very good argument to be made that true hyper toroids actually do have a strong relation to some of the metaphysical concepts Rodin mentions. I would like to give him the benefit of the doubt that perhaps he had a vision and just made a coil then embellished on the results or perhaps there was some conscious observer / placebo effect going on. But I don't rule out that the whole thing was a conscious disinformation campaign.

petersvideofile