NASA | Fermi's Close Call with a Soviet Satellite

preview_player
Показать описание
NASA scientists don't often learn that their spacecraft is at risk of crashing into another satellite. But when Julie McEnery, the project scientist for NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, checked her email on March 29, 2012, she found herself facing this precise situation.
While Fermi is in fine shape today, continuing its mission to map the highest-energy light in the universe, the story of how it sidestepped a potential disaster offers a glimpse at an underappreciated aspect of managing a space mission: orbital traffic control.
As McEnery worked through her inbox, an automatically generated report arrived from NASA's Robotic Conjunction Assessment Risk Analysis (CARA) team based at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. On scanning the document, she discovered that Fermi was just one week away from an unusually close encounter with Cosmos 1805, a dead Cold-War era spy satellite.
The two objects, speeding around Earth at thousands of miles an hour in nearly perpendicular orbits, were expected to miss each other by a mere 700 feet.
Although the forecast indicated a close call, satellite operators have learned the hard way that they can't be too careful. The uncertainties in predicting spacecraft positions a week into the future can be much larger than the distances forecast for their closest approach.
With a speed relative to Fermi of 27,000 mph, a direct hit by the 3,100-pound Cosmos 1805 would release as much energy as two and a half tons of high explosives, destroying both spacecraft.
The update on Friday, March 30, indicated that the satellites would occupy the same point in space within 30 milliseconds of each other. Fermi would have to move out of the way if the threat failed to recede. Because Fermi's thrusters were designed to de-orbit the satellite at the end of its mission, they had never before been used or tested, adding a new source of anxiety for the team.
By Tuesday, April 3, the close approach was certain, and all plans were in place for firing Fermi's thrusters. Shortly after noon EDT, the spacecraft stopped scanning the sky and oriented itself along its direction of travel. It then parked its solar panels and tucked away its high-gain antenna to protect them from the thruster exhaust.
The maneuver was performed by the spacecraft based on previously developed procedures. Fermi fired all thrusters for one second and was back doing science within the hour.
In 2012, the Goddard CARA team participated in collision-avoidance maneuvers for seven other missions. A month before the Fermi conjunction came to light, Landsat 7 dodged pieces of Fengyun-1C, a Chinese weather satellite deliberately destroyed in 2007 as part of a military test. And in May and October, respectively, NASA's Aura and CALIPSO Earth-observing satellites took steps to avoid fragments from Cosmos 2251, which in 2009 was involved in the first known satellite-to-satellite collision with Iridium 33.

Like our videos? Subscribe to NASA's Goddard Shorts HD podcast:

Or find NASA Goddard Space Flight Center on Facebook:

Or find us on Twitter:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

OK, so NASA have to keep track of all current satellites trajectory at least week in advance with all 1:18 that space debris out there! THAT'S CRAZY!!!

velvetine
Автор

The problem is that you have uncertainties. The further you go go forward, the less certain it gets. They are both moving at several kilometers per second. That means even a second difference is several thousand kilometers. To get within that 30ms range you need very accurate predictions so that's probably why they were only certain a week before the event.

the 1 second burn barely impacts the orbital path, but I'm sure space agencies share all that data to prevent accidents.

Niosus
Автор

"Do not mess with a working satellite."

If it is about to crash into another satellite, you better mess with it.

CIVILIZESAVAGE
Автор

Even small parts moving at several kilometers a second can do serious damage.

singedrac
Автор

4:20.... it's the galactic time for smoking space buds!

freshkryp
Автор

Actually, Niosus is right, they do move several kilometers per second (ISS is at 7.35 km/sec, Meteor M is at 7.58km/sec and so on...)

mikewoytek
Автор

It is time every country who has currently operational satellites or defunct and non operational space equip get their collective heads together, start building recovery machines/equip and recruiting for personnel to work and operate clean up equip in space to clear the space junk. Use magnets to capture the iron pieces, use ionizing nets to capture the non iron pieces to assist with clearing up the area. 5 years of work will clear a large area making it safer for future space operations.

rickseifert
Автор

Nice work nasa. Hopefully you can clean up the old sattelites and space debree so things like this aren't so nail biting in the future..

SnakeFist
Автор

Define large? Even low earth orbit is a big place. Very big. If we take a single slice of it, that alone would have a bigger surface than the whole of earth including oceans. Like that there are thousands of slices stacked. Mostly empty. Mostly.

We have yet to find a method to efficiently clean it up. We have to clean it up, but it is a very complex problem we do not have an answer to yet.

Keep in mind that there are also function satellites there which you may not disturb.

Niosus
Автор

why did this happen in the first place? its not mathematically complicated to confirm a clear orbit among the other orbiting objects...
what was done to prevent it in the future? yes you moved the orbit with a 1sec burn, but does this burn now pose a risk to other orbiting objects? are all of these small corrections being communicated internationally to all space agencies?

beepIL
Автор

Ohh come on! You'r talking about it as it was not presumed that the satelite would need the change in orbit form time to time.
Glad that Fermi is still buzing around Earth providing as a very precious information about the uneverse, but hating the way you emphasasing what happened.

stepanhr
Автор

Not even a reenactment of how close they got ? Why go to all this trouble not to show them both passing and how close it was ? What a jip

jackplastow
Автор

i agree,
but i think you mean meters not kilometers per second difference

beepIL
Автор

funny... i tough they allready had all the satellite orbit referenced on the International Celestial Reference System. guess it would be a worthy investment to protect those expensive toys

BATFURY
Автор

I am not just happy that the two satellites didn’t crash into each other. But I am also happy to hear a scientist WOMAN!! … If a man can, a woman “DO” too. jar
--
Muy feliz de escuchar una MUJER científica!!. jar

JovannyARodriguez
Автор

Great just terrific. Man fucks everything up now we live on what looks like god damd cybertron.

bigrichardhead
Автор

that's true... there is alot of drama in this....

IWIH
Автор

I wonder why there's a timer behind him.

johnricardo
Автор

Nasa: Thank you for the view! Have a nice day! :)

Mercy_Moon
Автор

So basically: Two satellites were going to cross paths. NASA decides to move theirs out of the way. Satellites don't hit each other.

wooo

bananapooptime