Russian Terror In Dnipro: Intercontinental Or Not – Experts Say the AFU Are Lying | Weekly Wrap-up

preview_player
Показать описание
Experts say that the Russian missile was not so much intercontinental (ICBM) but was of an intermediate range (IRBM). To know that must surely be a relief for people on the ground in the Ukrainian city of Dnipro.
_____________________________________
Subscribe to UATV English:

#UATV #UATV_English #missile #UkraineNews #UATV_News #News #Ukraine #UkrainianNews #EventsInUkraine #LatestNews #IRBM #TopNewsUkraine # intercontinental
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

UATV, keeping us up to date in the way we want! 💛💙

Mopsisgone
Автор

icbm or just an arrow, it was shoot at innocent people

marianodanielvillafanewagn
Автор

Thanks, Henry! Thank You, UATV.👍
Stay safe and strong, everyone in Ukraine!🙏🏻❤️
SLAVA UKRAINI from Norway!
🇺🇦💙💛💪🏻🌻🌹🇳🇴

unprofor
Автор

Vielen dank Henry 👍Slava Ukraine 💙 💛 ✌️ 💯 🤝 🔰 🔱✅️✅️

NEUBRAND
Автор

feels like semantics, the payload size is what matters... but i guess quibbling is how it moves one way or another.

paladro
Автор

To not honor the confederal generals, who were slave owners, from the civil war in the USA is something fundamentally different than the remembering a famine initiated by Stalin and the communists. I think that the division in the USA that is in play now is initiated by the descendants, In mindset, from the slave owners and there is an underlying racism in it. Which is proven not easy to get ride of. And not so much as a punishment for not willing to comply with the ruler, as is the case in the “holodomor”.

emiliat.
Автор

1:18: Oreshnik is a variant of the RS-26 Rubezh, which is an ICBM. UATV is right on the mark that it really doesn't matter if Russians call Oreshnik an IRBM or ICBM or anything else. This "military expert" is fussing over choice of acronym when he should have focused on the fact that this event was intended to escalate to the extent of carrying out a nuclear strike. After all the nuclear terrorism we have already seen Russia carry out, we should expect them to nuke Europe, USA and UK at any moment.

deewells
Автор

Great Job Henry and the team. Like lots of bloggers/tik tok guys they all think they are experts but all they’ve got is a narrow view and a big mouth which gets bigger the more followers they get.
Great channel. Love it. Keep telling it like it is and exposing lies and waffle.

technologytom
Автор

I like this news channel thank you for keeping us upto date.

philipnoronha
Автор

If the Ukranian govt knew, why didn't they tell their people?

abrakadavra
Автор

What ever it was it didn’t have any explosives attached. It was just dummies powered by kinetic energy. Scary af

thiagoalcantara
Автор

President or not trump still the same disgusting man what a disgrace 😂😂

leontinaleal
Автор

Did the class of missles make the life on earth less valuable?

MarcusJunior-bw
Автор

I wonder how much that Intercontinental Missile or whatever it was costs the Russians to put on a show like that, Putin and Military are really desperate.

fasx
Автор

ICBM OF RUSSIA is unstopable but no heavy impact to the target

joselitotoledo
Автор

Intercontinental or not Ukraine couldn't do anything about it.

ShadowMoses-lzei
Автор

Atacms are only 300km range, storm shadow-scalp 250km range. russian kinzhal 2000km range
russian iskander 500km range
Oreshnik Rs26 rubezh 5800km with multi warheads. russia get out of Ukraine and stop killing

philsharp
Автор

That city was chosen bcs no iron dome, so these sky rockets, would get to there target and look good .. no explosion you would expect.
What you scared of.

lloydbeattie
Автор

ICBM or not, the point being that it was nuclear capable. As has come out recently, it was an Oreshnik missile, which has a range of about 5800km, which is considered medium to long range, and could really be called either, an ICBM or an IRBM. In comparison, the Iskander IRBM has a range of about 500km. And as another commenter here pointed out, the Oreshnik is a variant of the RS-26 Rubezh, which is an ICBM. So Ukraine was technically correct here. As if Ukrainians which have to deal with IRBM attacks like from the Iskander on a daily basis couldn't tell the difference. They must think you guys are stupid. To call Ukrainians liars over a semantic squabble, wrongly on top of that, is just inappropriate. Well done reminding the so-called 'expert' who the real war experts are, Henry.

enki
Автор

This Propagandist channel calling itself “trusted” in bio 😄

koordrozita