Logic: The Method of Reason—part 5 by Harry Binswanger

preview_player
Показать описание
Logic: The Method of Reason -- part 5: Fallacies

Atlas Shrugged has been aptly described as “a hymn to logic.” But today what one finds in logic textbooks are sterile, formalistic diversions from real-life issues. This course, in contrast, will focus on the most personally important — and most neglected — topic in logic: concepts. It is proper conceptualization, not facility with syllogisms, that makes the difference between clarity and confusion, rational and irrational functioning, adhering to reality and wandering through dreamland. Drawing on Ayn Rand’s revolutionary identifications in logic, these five classes focus on the proper formation, definition, maintenance, and use of concepts. Emphasis will be given to working on practical exercises. The course is based on the material in chapters six and seven of How We Know, with class exercises to practice applying the principles to concrete cases.

Class 5. The lesson begins with analysis of the homework exercises. The four characteristics that make examples cognitively powerful are presented, with practice time allotted to help the student learn how to “think in examples.” Mill’s Methods and Thought Experiments are discussed. As well, three conceptual fallacies are defined and examined: false integration/division; anti-concepts, and stolen concepts.

SUBSCRIBE TO NEW IDEAL, ARI'S ONLINE PUBLICATION

SUBSCRIBE TO ARI’S YOUTUBE CHANNEL

ABOUT THE AYN RAND INSTITUTE
ARI offers educational experiences, based on Ayn Rand's books and ideas, to a variety of audiences, including students, educators, policymakers and lifelong learners. ARI also engages in research and advocacy efforts, applying Rand's ideas to current issues and seeking to promote her philosophical principles of reason, rational self-interest and laissez-faire capitalism. We invite you to explore how Ayn Rand viewed the world — and to consider the distinctive insights offered by ARI's experts today.

SUPPORT ARI WITH A DONATION

EXPLORE ARI

FOLLOW ARI ON TWITTER

LIKE ARI ON FACEBOOK

EXPLORE ARI CAMPUS

INFORMATION ABOUT OBJECTIVIST SUMMER CONFERENCES

LEARN ABOUT AYN RAND STUDENT CONFERENCES
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

So good to see these courses, especially for those of us who live far away. It is quality education. Thank you!

aeomaster
Автор

13:43 homework
Rationalization
23:18 fallacies of conceptualization
37:10 frozen abstraction
50:30 socialism

gykyqew
Автор

3:00 A cause is a special kind of relationships, it's a direct relationship between an attribute and an action. It works both ways by the way, whether the thing produced the action, or the action changed the thing, it's a direct relationship between them.

murada
Автор

My definition of cause

Examples I will skip. Intermediate concepts are Aristotle's four causes. Final definition is as follows

"An aspect of an action, without which an action ceases to exist"

For example color of rolling wheel is not the cause of rolling action. Solid nature and shape are. Also push is...

ronniereloaded