Alpha M is WRONG about watches! #luxurywatches #watchcollector #alpham #watch

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I don’t think he’s wrong. I don’t care if they’re well made or not, they’re absolutely hideous and now just a status symbol.

mikehayes
Автор

He's not wrong though. Balenciagas are expensive but they also look extremely hideous. More money doesn't always mean better.

MaxxSeemov
Автор

Rolex makes over a million watches a year too...
Art or not, no watch should cost more than a Ferrari.

whodey
Автор

Richard Mille are very exclusive and have amazing mechanical movement but they look really tacky

engineering-madness-dev
Автор

Casio rocks is the biggest takeaway from that topic.

LordMarchewka
Автор

He’s right I agree except Casio don’t look as bad as a Richard Mill and I’m not a big fan of his FYI

kickstothehead
Автор

You can never beat a classic Omega, Cartier, RM, is a Cash grab Watch

manigandanganesan
Автор

But for 150k you could get yourself a Richard mille with handmade movement

AbdullahRamadani-uo
Автор

The moment you admitted to Casio to being awesome, you have in principle validated Alpha’s arguments.
Watches are nothing more than jewelry for men, and attractiveness are just opinions.
There’s at least 50% of the population who think Casio’s are for dorks: women, lol.
By the way, I’m an enthusiast with a wide ranging stash, from ALS to, yes Casio’s.

You’re both right, and wrong:)

KC-bvkf
Автор

I would tend to agree that richard mille watches are simply a status symbol and i dont like them, theyre not pretty imo. But its lying if you say that they arent doing something genius

SW-
Автор

They are a status symbol and only bought because they cost so much to show off wealth. Shame you kept showing a VC as those actually are awesome watches. RM's look like trash.

Dachi
Автор

Well he’s the guy who wears Movement and Vincero watches too so…🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

dukes
join shbcf.ru