Barca vs Chelsea 1st leg 2009 was a robbery🤬😡

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

the funniest thing is that they only talk about the 2nd leg of the match

tomfom
Автор

All fans will watch the second leg and not watch this showing that they only think that game was bad due to Drogba

Jhoenix
Автор

even in the second leg, everybody ignores the ridiculous Abidal´s red card and the brutal foul from Essien against Iniesta

PauloSilva-cgzm
Автор

And they still cry about second leg robbery, it was a return gift to chelsea

jaanu
Автор

Vardrid fans cry more and more😂 visca barca💙❤️💙❤️

soheil
Автор

Hablaste con toda la verdad, madridista de bien me llenas de orgullo y te ganas mi respeto

thefernando
Автор

People saying second leg was more robbed here:

3 penalties not given to barca
3penaltiesnot give. To Chelsea

1 offside for Barcelona which was a 1v1 chance
0. Offside

1red card to Barcelona for nothing
Nothing to Chelsea

lol no one is replying ok so barca we’re denied of 4 goals so we’re Chelsea also an offside was given to Barcelona and eto would have scored it

fitbs
Автор

And they say barcelona paid the reff just because on the second leg they took revenge for playing dirty 😂😂 the double standart

rizkyananta
Автор

And when we see this video everybody can see that we deseved our qualification and our champion's league 2009 VISCA BARÇA Y VISCA CATALUNYA MÉS QUE UN CLUB 💙❤

TomAlvesdaSilva
Автор

Second leg was way more roberry than 1 leg ( if fist leg was robbery)

gabrielababkova
Автор

Like the Madrid dogs don't cry here 😅😅they only bark and cry when it suits them hot dogs 😂😂🤣

juancepeda
Автор

Exactly, barcelona also got robbed in the 2nd leg (Ballack handball and abidal red card, with drogba kicking pique in the stomach which should have been a red card right before that).

In the 2nd leg chelsea should have had maybe at most 3 penalties if you are being generous to chelsea (most referees would have given 2 on the night). And chelsea claim there were 5 penalty shouts that went against them.

Since barcelona were robbed of 2 goals in the 1st leg (no penalty given and eto'o incorrect offside) and 1 in the 2nd leg (not even mentioning ballack and drogba escaping red cards and abidal getting a red card), barcelona won fair and square.

Jedi_master_Plo_Koon
Автор

Penaldog fans, Vardridd likes wearing this Chelsea fashion skin the most😂

PajaTumbuang
Автор

1 penalty and 1 red card vs 5 penaltys, big difference

miguelcarvalho
Автор

No matter who won either Chelsea or Barca they would still be blame for robbery

gabeawesome
Автор

Missed plays in the first leg. Marquez fouls malouda for a penalty and Puyol seond yellow for foul.

carlosdanese
Автор

Penalty for Henry a yellow card for that crybaby Chelsea defender and a penalty for barca because of Chelsea defender hand ball and undeserved offside for Eto.

And after all that shit mfs come and say Chelsea got robbed in 2nd leg what about the massacre that the ref committed against barca in the first leg ???

hh
Автор

Lol what people don’t show you about the Chelsea vs barcelona match:

kingchewa
Автор

Hola De Arce, siento que este es el video donde demostraste lo objetivo y correcto que eres el un futbol y te felicito, yo no soy tan hincha del Barza, soy algo simpatizante, no soy español, pero bueno me da gusto saber que estas por el buen camino, ojala se difunda esto a más personas

thefernando
Автор

lol even if you compare all the calls, Chelsea were robbed and should have been through 4-3 on aggregate if we count all the penalty calls and other decisions.
UEFALONA at their peak from 2009 to 2011, even in 2010 Busquets play acted and got Motta sent off but justice prevailed when Jose's Inter went through to the final after playing with 10-men for 60 minutes at the Nou Camp.

shahzadirani
welcome to shbcf.ru