FC Barcelona (0-0) Chelsea 2008/2009 UCL semi final first leg

[YeTism]

The game the English media never talk about

[nejdetbulbul]

People don't talk about this game because it doesn't fit the Anti-Barca narrative.

[christopherdesantiago]

Crazy how Chelsea fans dont talk about this leg

[clown]

Funny how Drogba is not screaming in this game

[diegoynostroza]

El partido que todos los madridistas y anti Barcelona no quieren ver

[clipsnu]

In the 2nd leg Anelka dive no card
For him he gets a free kick and Abbidal gets a red card??? Drogba dives no cards. Mallouda dive no card, and gets a free kick? Ballack handball. And much more. The truth is the referee was horrible 4 both teams in both 1st and 2nd leg. Only unbiased fans now the truth

[mijael]

Bud watch the first leg first ☠️🙏
Maybe not as completely rigged as second leg but still.
Chelsea fans never talk about first leg right?

[fidelramirez]

i’m glad a highlight of this match was finally uploaded, i swear 2 years ago there was conveniently no videos showing how chelsea robbed us in the first leg. hopefully barca hater stfu now🤫

[ZaidNaji]

For those who said Barca robbed the game you didn’t watch the first leg any more many aggressive tackles and only one yellow card
Ineista get punched on his face by ballack and he didn’t get a red card and he already had yellow card .unfair offside for Samuel Eto and didn’t gave penalty for Henry .in the second leg the referee gave a red card for Abidal and he didn’t even touch Anelka a hand ball by ballack in the penalty area and no penalty . I’m not saying that the referee was good but he was bad for both sides

[Riot_Furro]

Вар нужен был в первом матче, где не назначили 2 пенальти и отменили голевую атаку из-за «оффсайда»

[AYN]

Funny how they try to make you forget this game

[sirfallsalot]

I’m sorry, but to the people saying “funny how Chelsea fans ignore this leg”, please, shut up. Just to let you know I’m a arsenal fan, so usually I like Chelsea suffering. So I’ll be the judge of this. Shall we?

0:53 foul was given. If you’re asking if it’s a red, I don’t see it. Maybe a yellow if you squint, but ultimately I think it’s a talking to. Good call

1:30 this is the first questionable moment. No whistle can be heard as far as I’m aware of. This is a yellow. He wasn’t trying to harm the goalie, but you still can’t say it’s incidental. He’s clearly trying to force the GK to drop the ball. But I also don’t think it’s a straight red. If he’s were to straight up run full speed into the GK then that would have been different.

1:40 no foul. The advantage was given. And this is certainly not a yellow. You see this all the time

2:05 foul. If you can even call it that. While it looks suspicious, if you slow it down in the replay the defender seems to get the ball. Then again, he may have pushed him. Hard to tell. I probably would have called it, then ask my linemen if he thinks it’s worth of a booking.

3:20. Foul, and a yellow card. Ref got this one right. It wasn’t a clear goal scoring opportunity, but it was one where fouling would stop their flow. Good call.

5:00. No offside. But I can see where the ref sees this. you see a frame or two where he genuinely looks offside. It’s not the right decision though. So let’s say he’s allowed to play on. Petr chech is charging at him, and it’s a difficult angle. I can’t say for certain that he scores this. So no updated score

8:05. Yellow, same as the other one. Not exactly going for the ball, but not a clear goal scoring opportunity. Chelsea is still at 11 men.

9:10. Penalty. 1-0 nothing Barca. He pulls him by the shirt. If you’re asking for a card, if this happens anywhere else it’s not even a talking too, so no, it’s not even a yellow.

10:30. No foul. By slowing down the footage, if there was contact, I don’t see it very well. Even then I don’t see it as a card. He’s trying to put his arm out like that to shepherd iniesta away from the pass, like a defender would. And there is no way he makes that free kick.

Okay, so it’s 1-0 Barca going into the second leg. If we count the 3 pens, it would have been….. 3-2 Chelsea. Any way you slice it, Chelsea got screwed over by bad officiating. No, I don’t think corruption was involved. But my point is that you can’t just ignore the 2nd leg. Understand that, I love Barca. If arsenal isn’t in the champions league, I’m always rooting for Catalonia. So don’t say I’m biased.

[MonkeyDLuffy]

None of these could be compared for the 5 penalties for Chelsea in the 2nd leg 😅

[Antonio]

gotta love how chelsea got a taste of their own medecine

[carloscespedes]

Todos hablan de la mano de abidal pero nuunca hablan del penal que no pitan a therry henry

[WSINH]

The funniest thing ever is Chelsea players diving in the 2nd leg, expecting the ref will decide the game for them one more time.

[rodrickjames]

This doesn't change the fact that the 2nd leg chelsea was still robbed, imo robbed worst than this one

[eth]

Yeah but when we did the tackles they got the foul but in the second they kept fouling and we got no pens

[nikolasrodriguesmesquita]

Na minha opinião, o barca nao foi roubado no primeiro jogo, acho que o impedimento do camisa 9 ( barca ) é normal...é algo que acontece ate hj 😅
O lance do henry é simples! ELE ESTAVA DESIQUILIBRADO e so jogou..
No jogo de volta, ouve dois lances que CLARAMENTE NAO FORAM PÊNALTIS! Um, o jogador do chelsea se jogou e no outro o Drogba foi desarmado ( ele ate cai em CIMA do zagueiro do barca ), os possíveis " toques de mao ", ..acho que o lance do pique foi normal ( bola na mao, nao mao na bola ampliando espaco ) e o outro foi " d'baixo do braço " tanto ate que pega na axila do jogador...
Resumindo, nenhum dos lances foi penalti e o resultado de 1 á 1 foi " justo " entre muitas aspas..
As duas equipes foram prejudicadas pela ARBITRAGEM! NAO PELOS JOGADORES OU CLUBES😊😊

[vsswenk]

Im still wondering where the robbed pen and red card is