Why Don’t We See Quantum Wave Behavior in Macro? #Shorts

Quantum behavior in large objects
quantum mechanics
quantum physics
Why don't we see wave behavior in large objects
Why don't we see quantum behavior in macro scale
wave function collapse
decoherence

[mwm]

I find it amazing that the threshold for certain effects happens where the volume and the surface area switch places as to which value is larger. In other words, when there becomes more on the inside of an object than on the outside or vice versa.

[scottgreen]

I recognize yer voice, Arvin. AI and utube are teaching quantum stuff. He's right, listen to him.

[nickduplaga]

Gravitational pull is much stronger at atomic scale, and with it gravitational time dilation.

[JakeFace]

Does the de Broglie wavelength have any physical significance for composite objects? Does a hydrogen atom have a wavelength? Or is it just 4 waves (an electron and 3 quarks) that each have their own wavelengths?

If an electron is propagating through space it has a certain wavelength, if another electron happens to propagate alongside it does it suddenly halve its wavelength?

[donwolff]

What, is there some special YouTube promotion driving everyone to do shorts to attract folks with the attention span of goldfish or something? 'Cause this trend is really base and rather disturbing.
Even the expertly done vids great folks like you have are but the thinnest slice of the pie. Folks, if you really want to learn this stuff, go to Stanford University on-line and follow the lectures of Robert Susskin.
Which, brings me to my challenge: how about a video series ramping up the information provided? One that is geared somewhere between YouTube and a real classroom lecture series? After all, if we are going to cater and bend, why not towards greater education and not towards business monetization? [Or at least do both, perhaps?]
And no, I'd rather learn from you or Sabine, who can bring the full range of color (and passion) to a subject rather than going to a learning chop shop like brilliant.
{ yes I'm pasting this into a bunch of your shorts in minor act of protest...and looking over the directional trend of your vids, such protest is long overdue}

[aviaxis]

what if the ball stands still and it has no momentum....

[DJ_Force]

It's the same reason actuary tables can predict the average number of automobile deaths next year, but can't predict if you will die on the way to work tomorrow.

[saumyashah]

What if the velocity of the said object is nil (thus, making the momentum zero as well)-what would be the wavelength of the object…?

[clawer]

2 things, wouldn't the wavelength be long? 10-33 seems like very high energy for a wavelength (steonger than gamma rays) and 2 wouldn't decoherence explain it.

[JinKee]

If something is not moving at all, its momentum is zero and you get a divide by zero error when calculating the wavelength.

[vicenterivera]

Maybe after a certain mass threshold, when the DeBroglie wavelength becomes smaller than the Planck length, this effect is unobservable by definition.

[HalfPixel]

Ha. I calculated this in high school 50 years. Vindicated at last!!

[unkgames-abdullahali]

That is Because we see just the reflection of the electromagnet waves we don't see the actual waves becuase the waves are reflecting the light waves which is what we can see.

[NewWorldBuddha]

Arvin, when speaking of quantum fields are these fields of energy and if they're not energy then what are they? No one ever addresses this question.

[srinivaskone]

Sir im harjith my dream is to work in outer space im 17 and completed and qualified joint entrance exam of india jee mains what should i know about that field plz help im from north india

[zack_]

That means the tennis ball has a frequency of 10³⁴s⁻¹. how does this work?

[TheLuminousOne]

Apparently the real laws of nature are really simple and are the same from sub-atomic to macroscopic. This is according to several ET human races that have been visiting Earth for hundreds and even thousands of years. From a Physics perspective they say we don't view things from the correct perspective and our physics is greatly confused and complicated due to the fact we have not fleshed out the foundations properly.

[TheTruthsPower]

because your looking at them with your eyes.