US officials: Russia on verge of invading Ukraine

preview_player
Показать описание
U.S. officials said nearly 200,000 Russian troops are amassed along the border with Ukraine. CBS2's Christina Fan reports.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

They been on the verge for 3 months now

Toogoodtobetrue
Автор

BREAKING NEWS …: JUST IN !!! I took a piss and didn’t flush the toilet

metrocard
Автор

Forget about the Ukrainian border and fix the American border

Horseracingtip
Автор

They’ve been on the verge for the past couple weeks.

emmy
Автор

Guess the Ukrainians didn’t pay hunter and the “big guy” enough money

truthisoutthere
Автор

Russia why are you not invading ukraine ? You have broken our schedule and put us into an embarrassing situation.

mr.rusvector
Автор

Sad that Putin's actions is more
trustworthy than Macron's word.

I
Автор

Do it will be after the Olympics! Welcome to the 2022 European War Games! Let see how many medals will get awarded! 😂

Reconseal
Автор

We've been on the Verge for months
The GREAT DISTRACTION

DB-fogo
Автор

How many times has CBS said this lie now? What makes you think they’re right tonight?

cjmerobot
Автор

No worries. Flatback Harris will gobble up all our enemies.

robertdavis
Автор

Russia has been on the verge for months

Imad-gkgw
Автор

What happen to the "eminent Invasion of Taiwan" ?.
It's still on, or not?. 🤷‍♂️

phamhuyphu
Автор

We are worried over these developments even while we are living far away.

scherukodan
Автор

Golly, I wonder if all this war rhetoric is meant to divert our attention from somewhere to somewhere else.

guod
Автор

Yea, sure. Tomorrow? Next day? Next month?
Fabrication. Junk and rubbish

rlrxpuk
Автор

Are these the same officials who made the same claims repeatedly over the past week or so

joeykelly
Автор

I’m glad somebody is acknowledging the US security establishment’s lack of credibility in this matter. Given the situation, we all need to ask ourselves, is all this really worth it? Did they really have to expand NATO right up to the Russians’ border? Why did successive US administrations, over decades, really insist on such a provocative course of action? Was it institutional militarism to justify our ever-expanding military budget and the never-ending quest to expand the empire? Why?

F*ck with the bull you get the horns, as they say. Can’t we spend some of these trillions on, say, health care instead?

mbaxter
Автор

difference between "looking dangerous" and "being dangerous".Russia describes military doctrine as defensive military doctrine. With regard to nuclear weapons specifically, Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons: in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies, in case of aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened.


oops


google russia deadhand
The 'Perimeter' system, dubbed in the United States and Europe the 'Dead Hand', is an automatic control system for a retaliation nuclear strike. To put it simply, if Russia's territory is devastated after a nuclear attack, the Perimeter system automatically strikes the enemy's territory with its own nuclear missiles

knowledge
Автор

thats a lot of mouths to feed.200k? at 5 bucks a meal thats 3 million a day in food and more in supplys.
man grouping that many troops in 1 spot is a really stupid move.Way to go Poot

leevahal