Best Audio Networking Protocol? ....Depends.

preview_player
Показать описание
Not all protocols were developed with the same capabilities.

Audio Guru Brian Maddox shares his insight on the "big three": Dante, AVB and MADI.
____

For FULL free courses, visit:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

You made so many things come clear to me ! thank you !

carlibeguerie
Автор

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 This is a great video! Thank you for such a comprehensive overview.

KordTaylor
Автор

I WONDER
my dante multitrac recording is giving a lot of latency issues. as clip duration increases clip appears to be stretced. i am using 64 track recording via cl5 rio in daisy chain

thesteel-hearted
Автор

Hope one day there'll be an international standard protocol for parameter control like analog gain or 48V or phasing over Dante, making a mixer made by a brand natively compatible with a Dante stagebox made by another brand.
Also I'm looking forward to see in the future that some DAWs and virtual rack softwares will have the ability to process Dante streams directly from and to the computer's Ethernet adapter without all the hassle of Dante<->ASIO conversion. If this can be achieved, there'll be a powerful rival against Waves Soundgrid.

JBF-GST-Tanda
Автор

I wonder why Ravenna wasn't listed here, being the only one with AES67 native support...

felipousismix
Автор

Wooooah, hold your horses regarding latency.

Standard AVB network latency is fixed at 2ms according to Motu. Also they’re proud about their 0.9ms figure

Dante - 0.25ms + 0.25ms = 0.5ms. Even if using higher latency settings = 1ms


… where is the lower latency in AVB? I’m only seeing higher numbers. (AVB DVS - yes, lower latencies on Mac but there are Dante/AVB interfaces)

TheGamerJakas
Автор

AVB is really miles away more solid than Dante.
I use Dante for some time then switched to of history.

SaveTheHuman
Автор

White Jeffrey Robinson Joseph Taylor William

ClarissaValerie-hr