Nuclear Physicist Reacts to Johnny Harris WTF Happened to Nuclear Energy?

preview_player
Показать описание
Nuclear Physicist Reacts to Johnny Harris WTF Happened to Nuclear Energy?

For Full uncut reactions, as well as supporting the channel, join my

Join the friendly Nuclear subReddit to discuss nuclear energy, ask questions and share memes - r/friendlynuclearfamily

Instagram - @elinacharatsidou
TikTok - @elinacharatsidou

In this video, I react to Johnny Harris WTF Happened to Nuclear Energy? video from the perspective of a nuclear physicist. I go through the Johnny Harris WTF Happened to Nuclear Energy? video of Johnny Harris and look through what is accurate information on Johnny Harris WTF Happened to Nuclear Energy? as a nuclear physicist and react to it.

Hope you like the video about Nuclear Physicist Reacts to Johnny Harris WTF Happened to Nuclear Energy?

Don't forget to like and subscribe!

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Well that was quite the video! Be sure to check out the full video, link in the description, to get the full context in which I’m coming from. It’s good to see people try to raise awareness for nuclear power. When it comes to journalists it’d be better to have more factual data and less personal feelings and opinions. I’d also be interesting to see them calling out their own and discuss about the media’s influence in the topic, since they’re so closely related to it. What do you think?👩🏽‍🔬☢️

YourFriendlyNuclearPhysicist
Автор

Im not a big johnny fan. At first I was but after a few vids I found that he cherry picks the facts that support the narrative and skips over concepts or facts and time lines that are quit important. I feel he is more after the views and the entertainment value then actually doing a documentary

entropyachieved
Автор

The crazy disconnect that makes me want to explode is that not only do coal fired power plants release 10x more radiation into the environment than nuclear power plants, it's done in a way that contaminates the surrounding environment, the people and animals and plants that inhabit the environment, and any products made from that environment, i.e., food. That doesn't even begin to consider the harmful substances which also get spread around.

GlenHunt
Автор

I absolutely love your videos, nuclear power has been a major fascination of mine since I was a kid. It's great to see someone who takes a true logical and scientific approach to the subject.

brianfisher
Автор

I have to agree. Experts of other fields also criticised his videos :/
The excuse is that he's focusing more on storytelling, but that doesn't really excuse factual mistakes. I've watched his economy videos also, and he's not that great at simplifying things either. Storytelling can be a great tool, but it should be the right story.. not the wrong or misleading one.
Really makes me appreciate Veritasium, who is also a general science communicator, also focuses on storytelling, but aims to stay accurate above all.

Marqan
Автор

You nailed the state of journalism... Thank you!

TheOldBlackCrow
Автор

I'm not afraid of nuclear power because I understand it. I'm actually a supporter of it. Sadly my country is nuclear free, but if we want to live the electric vehicle nightmare we absolutely need nuclear power

michaelwebber
Автор

The fact that you make such hard topics sound so comprehensible says so much about your knowledge in the field ❤

채월Sky
Автор

On point about journalists sharing their feelings!

zzord
Автор

A great analysis, and I love that you insist on peer reviews, notations and journalists, not giving their opinion or what they feel

killphil
Автор

Moral of the story, never trust a journalist.

protennis
Автор

As a scientist your way of understanding and explanation makes it all so clear, they way concepts are corelated makes me excited about nuclear energy

revenantwolzart
Автор

The problem with the statement of US people being split 50/50 on nuclear power is that it only represents the people willing to respond to a survey. Also not knowing if the questions asked were structured in a way to lead one answer over the other.

stardave
Автор

The approach that these two vloggers are taking is to establish empathy with a skeptical audience before allowing themselves to be persuaded to a different position. It's less about objective reporting and more of a persuasive video that they're putting together.

grantcivyt
Автор

Thanks to your channel I'm more prepared with arguments when debating such issues with my nuclear-skeptic friends.

IngVasiu
Автор

"What The Fish-Fingers" - aaaah, I always wondered what that stood for! 😁

JohnDoe-txlq
Автор

Incredibly well and factually explained. We need more people like you, who educate other people and take their fears away. Very good job! 👍

howtocookazombie
Автор

Having just found your channel whilst looking for more information on nuclear power. You are an asset to your field, passionate, beautiful and obviously smart, but what really impressed me in this video was how quickly you looked for the reference source. I just wished more people would highlight how important it is to look behind the information that is being presented.
I'll probably be binge watching your other videos, but if you have not covered it yet, have you any thoughts on the small nuclear reactors that are currently being developed for supplying domestic power. ( Military sized reactors ).

moorgunandmarshes
Автор

I really like the last point you made about how media has treated the topic. I went to Japan for an exchange year two weeks after Fukushima, and two things that surprised me were 1) how little the Japanese themselves were concerned about the nuclear aspect of it (speaking about the people you meet everyday, not the people working at nuclear plants). They were far more concerned about the earthquake and the tsunami. 2) how different foreign media talked about the issue. My mother mostly watched Spanish and Swiss tv, and the difference of how they reported about the incident couldn't be any larger if they tried. The same goes for other country's media, where some students went into full nervous breakdown because of the way they reported about it. Of course, it's everyone's own decision whether stay or leave after that - some countries actually had the students fly back, while others left it open to student whether they wanted to or not.
But long story short, since energy is so politicized, it's no wonder that media will reflect these biases and extreme opinions (whether positive or negative) and end up cherry picking sources and facts to their advantage.
I just found your channel by accident but I love the way you're reacting to these videos and explaining things clearly where I've missed some things while watching those videos beforehand.

alphaxneo
Автор

my favorite reaction videos : ) very well put together & explained

antonyshadowbanned