Interview with Author of UDRP's 'Passive Holding' Doctrine: Prof. Andrew Christie

GigaLaw's Doug Isenberg interviews Professor Andrew Christie, a UDRP panelist who created the "passive holding" doctrine in only the second decision ever published under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), in 2000. The case, Telstra v. Nuclear Marshmallows, is truly a landmark decision because it addressed how a domain name not associated with an active website could be considered that it "is being used in bad faith," as the UDRP requires. In this interview, Doug asks Prof. Christie to explain his thinking behind the decision and how well it holds up after almost 25 years.

Resources:

Disclaimer: This video is for general informational purposes only, provides only a summary of specific issues, and is not intended to be and should not be relied upon as legal advice regarding any specific situation. This video is not intended to create, and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Viewers should consult with legal counsel to determine how laws, policies or decisions and other topics discussed in this video apply to the viewers' specific circumstances. This video may be considered attorney advertising under court rules of certain jurisdictions. Copyright © 2024 Douglas M. Isenberg

[VinaySingh-eptv]

Sir i have emailed you my domain dispute details.. hopes to hear back from you.