Reacting to Every Political Ideology Explained in 8 Minutes

If you enjoyed this video don't forget to Like and Subscribe
really is appreciated

Links to my socials

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS

[annfrost]

"ism" means: a system, a doctrine, a principle, a movement. Such as Socialism, Anglicanism, Conservatism, Communism, Liberalism.

[aliciasavage]

Anarchy mean "no ruler". It does not mean chaos as humans have been conditioned (by their rulers) to believe. Archy - Ruler. An - None. Just like "mono" means one as in monarchy., one ruler.

[dinosharttt]

4:05 you heard a plane but since the video quality was so good we can’t hear it

[aniE]

Liberalism is good the way it's describe in this video. Unfortunately too many people these days claim to be liberal, but don't really believe in it's basic principles.

[ThatShyGuyMatt]

I mean the Purge does involve anarchy. Which just means things are chaotic and no one cares about the law. But obviously outsidew of the purge day itself, things are nomal.

[marxmaiale]

Many of these get their components mixed and matched depending on the ruling party. Don't expect the definition of any of these to be universally accepted or even used in the same way, people like to use and throw labels at others perceived as negative.

[jessedaniel]

i side libertarian and the party seems to be growing in the states as the last time i voted in Kentucky it was the only other party on the top right beside democrat and republican

[knightofblackfyre]

Nazism, while similiar to Fascism, is its own Ideology just like how Socialism, Communism, and Syndicalism are different but very similar. Also Transhumanism, or atleast the belief we should improve our bodies with technology, has pretty much been around as long as Science fiction has which itself has been around since i think the late 1800s? Also there is a part two to this video.

[happybeejv]

Anarcho fascism is when the state will let criminals run loose, but if you defend yourself they will arrest you because the law is selectively enforced

[aliciasavage]

"Liberalism " used to mean that, thats why i always considered myself one, but sadly these days those who are called "liberals" dont believe in all those things.

[happybeejv]

The one true unifying ideology is kleptocracy.
Because when it happens to you its left authoritarian, but when you do it to others its right libertarian

[ThatShyGuyMatt]

I mean I'm kinda for transhumanism. I mean if you could have a cybernetic heart, lungs....etc and it would protgect you from many health issues, that would be a good thing. Or id you had an implant that somehow superboost your body so you heal super fast, that would be amazing. Transhumanisn doesn't mean we want to force people to get tech though. Mind you I am disabled, not physcially though. If I could have cybernetic updgrades, my quality of life would be so much better. This is why you may seem more disabled for it.

[SonOfMuta]

9:08 "One of the newer ones" 😂🤣

One of the early precursors to transhumanist ideas is Discourse on Method (1637) by René Descartes.

In his first edition of Political Justice (1793), William Godwin included arguments favoring the possibility of "earthly immortality" (what would now be called physical immortality).

Fundamental ideas of transhumanism were first advanced in 1923 by the British geneticist J. B. S. Haldane in his essay Daedalus: Science and the Future, which predicted that great benefits would come from the application of advanced sciences to human biology—and that every such advance would first appear to someone as blasphemy or perversion, "indecent and unnatural".

Julian Huxley was a biologist who popularised the term transhumanism in an influential 1957 essay. The contemporary meaning of the term "transhumanism" was foreshadowed by one of the first professors of futurology, a man who changed his name to FM-2030. In the 1960s, he taught "new concepts of the human" at The New School when he began to identify people who adopt technologies, lifestyles, and worldviews "transitional" to posthumanity as "transhuman".

[michaeltnk]

This video definitely went over his head

[RevPeterTrabaris]

Fascinating. I appreciated this video. There were certainly ideologies that I was not aware of. I was surprised to see how similar, in many ways, they are to each other, except for the more authoritarian ones. I would add Monarchism, which is kind of what I would call modern monarchies which are not very imperialist in my view. Unfortunately, it seems to me that many places in the world are seeing a flirtation with fascism and dictatorship today. Thankfully, so far, most civil societies appear to be fighting these movements back at the ballot box. I am praying that my society, the U.S. will overcome this movement here. Also, unfortunately, from what I can see throughout my lifetime, Nazism seems to always be hiding in most Western societies, trying to come out. Really interesting and thought-provoking Thurston. Peace

[kylepickus]

Nazism shares its ultra-nationalist, expansionist and racist sentiment, but Nazism focuses more on Judaism while fascism is more purely nationalist. They both are usually populist and have a capitalist organization of the economy. They both critique the elite, but unlike socialism they focus more on bourgeois decadence and pretty much substitute “upper class” and “bourgeoisie” with “Jews”

They both may engage in expansionism, but while Nazis do so for “living space for the aryan race, ” fascists would do it for prestige and national pride.

[dinosharttt]

Amazing video you never make a boring video

[cygnusx-]

You either have *private ownership* of the means of production -- or -- *public ownership.* This is the dividing line. Whoever has ownership, has power. For example, whether women will be treated equally (feminism) or the environment will be respected (environmentalism) will be decided by who owns the productive capacity of society. You either want a handful of billionaires to control government and make all decisions (capitalism) or you want workers (socialism) to have power. Those are your choices.

[cygnusx-]

12:11 Unfortunately, it's not dying out. It's happening on horrific scale in Gza right now. Hopefully you're paying close attention.

[kevindunn]

There is also the woke ideology. The symbol is an empty brain.