How the ISS Would Look if Russia Pulled Out | WSJ

preview_player
Показать описание
Amid tensions between Moscow and the West over the Ukraine war, the Russian space agency said the country would quit the International Space Station after 2024. WSJ breaks down the design of the spacecraft to see whether it could function without Russian parts.

Photo illustration: Sharon Shi

More from the Wall Street Journal:

#ISS #Russia #WSJ
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

ISS was supposed to be retired and deorbited in 2015. It's components were built with a 10 year lifespan. It is now pushing passed that with some core components of the station hitting 20 years. And now its retirement has been pushed to 2030.

It is not just a political issue there is an engineering and safety issue.

nickl
Автор

The Russians own 7 modules of the space station and the main module is the one that keeps the space station at it's altitude

internetisinteresting
Автор

Ah yes, the international measure of a football field

FinancialShinanigan
Автор

1:52 “and that ALTITUDE control system...”
No, he didn’t say altitude. He said ATTITUDE control system, as in orientation, or which way the vehicle is pointing.
2:13 “the two Russian modules have engines and thrusters that maintain altitude”
No. Only the Zvezda module is used for that. The engines on the Zarya were permanently deactivated decades ago. If they were still active, and they fired those engines, you would damage or destroy everything behind it. Please improve your research, WSJ.

regolith
Автор

When you're in space you're not from russia or usa, you're from earth

luxuryhub
Автор

Please add measurements in the metric system too for the international audience

andre
Автор

US: 4:03 "we'll degrade their aerospace industry including their space program"
Russia : We pulling out of ISS
US : Oh no !! this is Russian blackmail
😅West is confused

InlandEnergy
Автор

USSR built Mir Space Station while under sanctions. What makes them think Russia has no capability to do it again?

KonstantinTsiolkovsky-ivfw
Автор

Attitude control, not altitude. Attitude control is the process of controlling the orientation of an aerospace vehicle with respect to an inertial frame of reference or another entity such as the celestial sphere, certain fields, and nearby objects, etc.

cullentaussig
Автор

Sadly the station is cracking apart from thermal expansion and cooling. She’s in her last decade regardless. The next station will likely be private, spaceX

seancssu
Автор

Everyone has said they will leave the ISS sometime after 2024. The USA has been more precise they plan 2030 presently. But no one has said they will leave it.

paulduncanson
Автор

The US sanctioned the Russian aerospace program. Do you really expect that Russian space leadership will want to remain on the ISS?

fefedufef
Автор

The ISS is a symbol of a better time when close co-operation between Russia and the US was possible.

specialandroid
Автор

He said “attitude” control system not “altitude” control system. Words mean things. Get it right WSJ.

surfmb
Автор

This is one of many reason why America and Russia should be at least neutral partners not enemies.

luckyluke
Автор

I there any way to watch the full interview with Leroy Chiao without B roll and other stuff cutting in.

ieuanhunt
Автор

If Russia and USA were collaborating in technology, then we would be living in the future.
I come in peace ✌️

jamesmankone
Автор

They have been treated quite badly by the west over the conflict in Ukraine, which wasn't reciprocated when Iraq was invaded in 2003. Russia will quite rightly will pull out its equipment and expertise by 2024, and probably join up with China, Iran and the other BRICS nations.

John-huqg
Автор

One important note - the U.S. technically owns Zarya. We paid for it, and Boeing contracted the work to the Russians. Yes, it’s a ‘Russian’ module in the sense that they built and launched it, but the U.S. paid for it almost in its entirety, so I’m willing to bet that even if the Russians could hypothetically detach their section and leave (they can’t b/c they’re dependent upon the U.S. section for power and orientation), they won’t be allowed to take Zarya that easily.

barometricfunk
Автор

Thre U.S can't get their astronauts into space without Russia.

ridds