The art of argument | Jordan Peterson | Big Think

The art of argument
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you really want to win an argument, or do you want to find mutual ground and understanding? Canadian psychologist and author Jordan Peterson feels that in most cases it's the latter. It might take some getting used to, he posits, as acquiescence by its very nature means admitting that you're wrong in some way. Jordan's latest book is 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JORDAN PETERSON:

Jordan B. Peterson, raised and toughened in the frigid wastelands of Northern Alberta, has flown a hammer-head roll in a carbon-fiber stunt-plane, explored an Arizona meteorite crater with astronauts, and built a Kwagu'l ceremonial bighouse on the upper floor of his Toronto home after being invited into and named by that Canadian First Nation. He's taught mythology to lawyers, doctors and business people, consulted for the UN Secretary General, helped his clinical clients manage depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, anxiety, and schizophrenia, served as an adviser to senior partners of major Canadian law firms, and lectured extensively in North America and Europe. With his students and colleagues at Harvard and the University of Toronto, Dr. Peterson has published over a hundred scientific papers, transforming the modern understanding of personality, while his book Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief revolutionized the psychology of religion. His latest book is 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSCRIPT:

Jordan Peterson: So how do you deal with situations where your words are likely to be used out of context, let’s say.

And that’s a situation I’ve encountered. Well, you see, you encounter a situation like that very frequently. Everyone does in their life. If you’re having a discussion with someone you live with, for example, so someone you have to be with for a long time – a lover, boyfriend, girlfriend, wife, husband—sibling for that matter. You’re going to have contentious discussions about how to move forward and it’s very frequently the case that your words will be – that you’ll be straw-manned. Your words will be taken out of context.

The other person (and you too!) will try to win instead of trying to solve the problem. What you have to kind of decide is – well two things. The first thing is: you’re probably wrong in some important way. And you might think “Well, so what?” But no, it’s not so simple. Being wrong in some important way is like having a map that doesn’t correspond to the streets.

If you’re wrong in some important way, when you go to where you’re going you will get lost and you might end up in a neighborhood that you don’t want to visit! So it actually matters if you’re wrong.

And so now if you’re talking to someone who is acting in opposition to you, it’s possible that during your contentious discussion they will tell you something—about how you’re wrong—that’s accurate. Now you’re not going to be very happy about that, because like who wants to discover that they’re wrong?

But it’s better to figure out that your map is inaccurate than it is to get lost.

And so one of the things you have to remember when you’re discussing things with people, even if they’re out to defeat you, let’s say, is that there is some glimmering of the possibility that you could walk away with more knowledge than you walked in with.

And that’s worth – that can be worth paying quite a price for.

And so I’ve had the opportunity to engage in public debate of an exceptionally contentious nature for let’s say 18 months nonstop, fundamentally. And it’s been very stressful. But the upshot of that is that my arguments are in much better shape than they were, and—I shouldn’t say that. My THOUGHTS are much more refined than they were at the beginning of this process. It’s not my arguments are in better shape. That’s not the right way to think about it.

It’s that I’m clearer about what I know. I can articulate it better. And that’s all forged in the heat of conflict.

If you’re discussing a contentious issue with someone you love and that you have to live with and put up with, you want to listen to them. Because what you really want to do is establish a lasting peace, and you might even have to make their arguments for them. Maybe you’re more verbally fluent than your partner (which doesn’t mean, by the way, that you’re more right, it just means you can construct better arguments on the fly. It doesn’t ...

[petariivanov]

"Most people's arguments are incredibly shallow. They are not even arguments. They are just perceptual biases..."

[ganeshprem]

"it's not a very good idea to win an argument with your wife"
This is wisdom.

[keyorempi]

"It's better to figure out that your map is inaccurate than it is to get lost."

[Preest]

Its amazing, even here you can see Peterson "think" out his answer in real time, and even corrects himself if he goes astray from what he is trying to articulate. He's a great teacher for us all

[dranirbanpal]

Man, I love this guy. He uses language with great precision and care, and he hedges often which is quite relieving.

[AzazeoAinamart]

I love how clear his talk is. He definitely thinks about what he says

[keyorempi]

As a non-english speaker, I love listening to JBP even though I have to look up several unknown words quite often.

[tazraidshadowlegends]

"Not what to think, but how to think." Peace nobel prize for this gentleman.

[Grubnessul]

Why does this guy get all the hate? His Big Think videos seem pretty moderate and straight forward.

[danmegamozart]

Whenever I listen to a new Peterson video I always feel little wiser to handle all my

[Noontide]

Super eloquent. Always refreshing to hear Dr. Peterson.

[sergiosanchez]

The best advice you can receive in your life is at 3:20 - 3:55.

[jonahmillerduvalrazed]

So enlightening it literally brings tears to my eyes

[magiciansway]

The reasonableness of this great man is continually enlightening. Many thanks Mr Peterson.

[tombotje]

Wow! I'm a second year psychology student in Amsterdam and we use the forced devided opiniated discussions in our group seminars. I actually respect them more now that I know why they did that and that they did it! Much love to you Jordan!

[MalcadorTheSigilite]

This is why I'm still subscribed to big think.

[MarkAnthonyHenderson]

"Most people's arguments are unbelievably shallow. They're not arguments, they're just perceptual biases." That's argumentation in a nutshell, and so true.

[adelittastanton]

I am soooo grateful for the internet to be able to access Dr. Peterson

[vhsjpdfg]

"It's not a very good idea to win an argument with your wife, because a defeated partner is not happy."
– JBP

[PeterHamiltonz]

I've found a lot of discussions like this boil down to:

"This is how what you said made me feel" (And they are right)

"But that's not what I meant" (And you're right)

And there is no reconciling this.