Carbon Dating Confirms Biblical Events?

[Repent-vpsj]

Yahweh is the same, yesterday, today, and forever more!!!

[janiceridsdale]

EXCELLENT - MORE PLEASE 😊❤WESTERN 🇨🇦 Thank you 😊

[danielrickel]

Take anything carbon14 dating says with a grain of salt because it’s unreliable at best

[gusbarrera]

Scientists also discovered, using the space telescope, that space is expanding at a pace indicating everything is much younger than previously thought.

[humbledone]

Carbon 14 dating has been shown to be wildly inaccurate after just several thousand years. Even in known cases from the modern era there can be a significant +/- in decades. What this guy is saying that if you know the where the find occurred, and other factors, including historical events, the carbon 14 dating method can be a useful tool. It’s somewhat circular reasoning but that is rampant in archaeology and paleontology. What you cannot use carbon 14 dating for is on items “millions or billions” of years old because the model around carbon dating would necessarily assume that no carbon 14 should be left in the sample. The further away from the present that the item being tested originated the greater the degree of error. Therefore, if you found carbon or DNA in animal fossils, it would prove that those animals lived within several thousand years of the present, and could not be “millions or billions” of years old using the carbon dating model.

[thebuff]

No one finds it odd that the half life just so happens to be 5, 700 yrs?

[SK-bwcv]

There are many things that throw carbon dating off. Nuclear explosions from the past. Volcanic eruptions. The global flood.
It's not as rock solid as people think.

[brianherndon]

How do you know the assumptions they used are correct?

[StudentDad-mcpu]

We already knew these dates - but this video is a classic SPIDERMAN FALLACY

[newcreationinchrist]

Amen AIG 🙏🙏🙏✝️ Carbon dating is extremely flawed. Especially when you take into account the global flood which would have completely changed the carbon ratio in the atmosphere. God bless

[PatrickKQHBD]

Can we get a link? What research are we talking about? There's nothing to connect to here.

[isakrynell]

So carbon dating works when it supports what you like but if it doesn’t then it’s unreliable. This is so backwards and dishonest. What he is describing is bias and you don’t want bias. In fact you should not start with any assumptions at all. You should try to look at the evidence dispassionately, you then build an hypothesis based on that evidence and then you try your best to disprove your own hypothesis as much as possible when you fail to disprove your hypothesis you ask other researchers in your field to disprove it and if no one can disprove it, you can call your hypothesis provincially true as long as someone els can’t disprove it. This is the scientific method and if the bible account is true then this method can prove it and in this case as far as I’m a where it does confirm the biblical account. But you can’t then turn around and dismiss it out of hand when it doesn’t. What if the Iron and Bronze Age scribes who wrote down the biblical stories got some things wrong? What if the catholic priests who compiled these stories in to the bible got somethings wrong? What Pope Damasus I got something wrong when he declared that this bible should henceforth be considered the word of God. I mean do you really put that much stock in the Popes opinion? Maybe if you start with the assumption that God made the natural order you should look at nature to find your answer? But then again perhaps you shouldn’t start with any assumptions at all.

[joshuakohlmann]

So carbon dating is only reliable if you start out assuming the conclusion that you want to reach? Whereas if you apply carbon dating with an open mind, it's unreliable? So much for the scientific method.

[RobertA-oihw]

Carbon 14 proves bible dates. Not secular dates.

[warrenjansen]

Everyone seems to fault carbon-14 dating until it proves their assumptions right.

[elfrenbernier]

So now, you put a drop of a liquid on something and a number pops up 🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦

[BurrritoYT]

Me when I claim an unreliable method is perfect when it suits my argument

[wardraven]

So it proves that the authors of the Bible put some actual events into the Bible. We already know that nothing new. What this proves more thing anything is the accuracy of carbon14 dating.

[zerosteel]

All radiometric dating methods use scientific procedures in the present to interpret what has happened in the past. The procedures used are not necessarily in question. The interpretation of past events is in question. The secular (evolutionary) worldview interprets the universe and world to be billions of years old. The Bible teaches a young universe and earth. Which worldview does science support? Can carbon-14 dating help solve the mystery of which worldview is more accurate?

[jeffwagner]

Major problem of Carbon dating preflood is it assumes things were as they are now. Which is incorrect as the atmosphere was completely different.