V-Ray 6 vs Corona 9 | What to choose in 2022???

In this video, I will compare the latest versions of the 2 most popular render engines for 3ds max - Corona 9 and V-Ray 6.

🔴 Useful Videos:

⏱️ Timestamps
0:00 FRAME BUFFER
2:53 LIGHTMIX
4:03 RENDER SETTINGS
4:48 RENDER TIMES
7:32 SUN & SKY - PROCEDURAL CLOUDS
9:06 IMAGE TYPE
9:38 OTHER OPTIONS
9:57 TECHNICAL ASPECTS
10:26 FINAL OUTPUT
10:54 PRICING

🔥 My Courses that will help you improve your skills:

👩💻 Software & Tools I use & recommend:

✅ Let's connect:

#archvizartist #rendering #architecturalvizualisation
PS: Some of the links in this description are affiliate links that I get a kickback from 😜

[smedlap]

I used Vray for about 12+ years or so. I switched to Corona in 2019 and feel the lighting results are more accurate. I create architectural illustrations as a profession and have done so for the past 20 years now.

[heidad]

The result depends on the driver and not the vehicle... Both plugins have reached a very high level and the difference is in the artist who works with them.... You can achieve any result you want if you specialize in one software. I've been working with V-Ray for 15 years and I'm not ready to switch to any other software... I do architecture with it at a very high level and also animations - I don't stop being enthusiastic about it!

[movilestudio]

Chaos Vantage is amazing, and that's why I keep using Vray.

[varunu]

Vray RTX render is a game changer when it comes to rendering time and quality.

[corc]

I prefer vray because there is a vray gpu mode - with a couple of rtx cards, everything renders very fast, especially for animation. Arnold render is also very good. Corona best for single image of interior or exterior scene. Worth mentioning "chaos vantage" - simple and very fast engine (now free).

[edenassos]

If it's for the client, Unreal Engine anytime because you can compile it as a game and show a real-time interactive demo and setup blueprints/code to make features like doors moving or TV switching on possible. You could even go as far as making a whole configurator in the demo. If it's for analog marketing material like brochures then even Unreal's Pathtracing works well and you can do far more. Archviz is no longer just static images. People don't usually feel the connection when you just show them a render. A real-time demo that you can walk in will allow the client to make better decisions and that means saving time on back and forth and miscommunications.

[mhd_hmouda]

Tbh there's no huge difference between the two, both vray and corona generate similar high quality results, but I will always choose corona over vray for the user friendly interface and easy settings adjustment. This definitely saves me time on my projects and I always prefer working fast.

[krzysztofbogdanowicz]

I know many people migrating from Vray to Corona. I do not know even single person who moved from Corona to Vray. But the future is Unreal Engine.

[thelucfr]

I have used V-Ray many years, after mine colleague start working on Corona, I switched for Corona since he send me beta. I have it for free from him, but it worth any penny. Its cheaper, faster, better, les noise (and with nvidia denoise amazing results), easier to use than V-Ray for begginers. And since Covid start in 2019, everyone using Corona :D It was free for 2-3 months :D

[Soluchi-InfiniteCoCreatorGod]

Thank you, fellow Co-Creator. I prefer Corona because of how Realistic it looks like, too. 👍

[hynol]

Vray background image works fine as long as you are rendering on black background. If edge pixels are premultiplied with other color, it won't work.

[nimeshparihar]

in the 1st test both render image pixels are different 424x530 in corona and 804x1005 thats why vray take 45 sec

[relaxation_ambience]

It would be very interesting to see how it compares V-Ray GPU vs Unreal Engine 5.1 path tracer in render times/quality.

[pkplayz]

They both work really really good it's really hard to choose one among this options! 😂 But one thing I know for sure that many people love to use corona!

[marcuswarrak]

I was trying to understand why my interactive render in vray is noisy and not clear, I was awfully perplexed, but thanks to your video it is now clear for me, that I should use Corona render for a better interactive render quality. Thank you.

[hastasiempre]

I prefer Corona because it gives a more clear image of the project from the first seconds with a less noise value and more realistic touches, in addition, Corona gives significantly greater accuracy to HDRI images, the HDRI image during the first minutes of rendering in Corona was higher quality than the final rendering of V-ray.

[mehmettoguz]

Anyone who watches this video, shall not have a question about which renderer is better. Really nice video as usual.
My thoughts are vray will be survived, corona will be left alone to be vanished. They wont develop them at the same time, maybe They will be merged that will be called "v-corona" renderer :)
I wont switched to corona, I have learned a lot in vray. Results are a slightly different.
If corona was not acquired by Chaos group, I would have a thought that to use the corona.

[rafaelglobalsupport]

I am reading about these two render plugins power consumption.

[maeenalgade]

انتي تقومين بشرح عظيم وانا اتعلم منك الكثير 😊

[andrey.]

both are great. it deppends on what hardware do we have. vray GPU is really good and fast.