LOGIC in philosophy - Can there be Alternative Logic? (Ep 7.3)

LOGIC in philosophy, what is it? How did it come about and can there be different logics? This video will introduce logic on a basic level and then discuss thing philosophically up to relevant point we want to reach discussion if logic is relative.
Also to be clear it's Brouwer -- not Bouwer -
Twitter:
To support me:
or

If you are reading this --- I mean shouldn’t you SUBSCRIBE then?

LINKS:
Power of Relativism playlist if you want to start this series from the beginning

or jut the Power of Relativism in Philosophy first video

Truth in philosophy vs Relativism

LINK TO NEXT VIDEO!!!!!! --- TBA

-----------------
MUSIC:

Open and end cards
Track: Last Heroes - Dimensions [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.

Other music :

Kevin Macleod
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License
Screen saver
Infinite Perspective
Dreams Become real
Crypto
Inspired
Dream Culture
------------
Works Cited / Reference list
O’Grady, Paul. Relativism. McGill-Queens University Press, 2002.
Kirk, Robert. Relativism and Reality: A Contemporary Introduction. 1999.
Phillips, Patrick J.J.. The Challenge of Relativism. Continuum, 2007.
-------------------------
#Philosophy
#Logic
#Relativism
#Metaphysics

PHILOSOPHERS
KEEP
BATTLING

[PhilosophyBattle]

Correction -it's *Brouwer
Also-- on the grounding of Math into logic, it wasn't merely because I thought it 'was cool' lol. I now think it's a little misleading the way I phrased it, It's not the idea that logicians were trying to show themselves more especially super awesome somehow than mathematicians, if that's what it seemed like I was saying. They were trying ground math in logic, so that math could be as secured logic, because the foundations of math became threatened due to some issues I hope I can get into and explain one day when I make videos on the OG Analytics, namely Russell. Whether they were successful or not is another topic, but I still think it's super cool that they even thought to do this with logic! Don't you?

[theycallmerye]

I really enjoyed this video. I hoped you don't get discouraged by having a relatively small audience, cause this is a really good video. Informative and entertaining.

[KingCrocoduck]

I love that Susan Haack dual wields axes. In my head-canon, she named them Foundationalism and Coherentism, and they combine at the hilt to make a giant two-sided axe called Foundherentism.

[AlvaroALorite]

I'm from Spain, but I wish I could have you as a friend dude. You seem like a nice guy who I would have long conversations with :)

I'm really enjoying your videos, I hope your channel booms

[leonmills]

philosophy battle your channel is something new that I've never seen on youtube like your channel very much and videos you post

[AlainRobertyellow]

Great video! I just started getting into logic this really helped

[christiantodorov]

Great work, i am really confused as to how this channel only has this many subscribers. I will try to share but i dont know many people who will care about non-pop culture academic philosophy. Although you are obviously analytically oriented, have you thought about making videos on continental philosophy, even if it is a take-down video lol

[rileyrileyrileyriley]

Really cool video! There's a lot of untapped potential in logic, I think particularly for making conclusions and frameworks of rules for future physics and such.

[greyfade]

Re: Sheffer's Stroke, look up Alonzo Church. He systematized all computation into the lambda calculus in 1934. I see Sheffer devised the stroke in 1913. Although Church didn't do it earlier, he and Alan Turing both independently proved that digital logic, formal proofs, mathematics, and algorithms are fundamentally equivalent in terms of computability.

At a glance, it looks like Sheffer's Stroke is equivalent to digital NAND, which is the basis for all digital computing, as it has been shown (by Sheffer, no less!) that all logical operations can be formed from a collection of NAND gates (or NOR gates, in fact, the formal logic equivalent of which is Peirce's Arrow or Quine's Dagger).

[blaufrosch-wdxc]

Given that you were serious about not knowing how to say Begriffsschrift you can use forvo, there are pronounciation examples for words by natives of many languages.

[Bit-while_going]

I can't really imagine an alternative to the logic you showed. What would it be for? Quantum Sudoku?

[leonmills]

Can't believe that is the last video of the series was wishing for some more forks

[Impaled_Onion-thatsmine]

Practical logic.. bypasses important intervals and symbolic that's medieval mathematical logic

[Syllogist]

Great sorry, but you must to know that…
1) CONCLUSION FOR ANY SYLLOGISM CAN CALCULATE INTO ALGEBRAIC FORM;
2) DIAGRAMMS OF ANY SYLLOGISM MAY BE PRESENTING AS SUM-SET INTO VOLUM OF EIGHT SUB-MULTITUBES (SMP, SMP’, SM’P, SM’P’, S’MP, S’MP’, S’M’P, S’M’P’)...
:-)

[AlvaroALorite]

39:21 I'd like to introduce Quine to psychology of thought and neural networks hahaha

Spoiler alert: logic is not fundamental to our thought. Heuristics on the other hand, seem to be.

[michaelsommers]

It's 'Peirce', not 'Pierce', and it's pronounced like 'purse'.

[sergiomesquitarocha]

15:08 That ~~S DN was pretentiously unnecessary.