5 Reasons Why Sigma Art Lenses Are The Best For Your Videos & Photography

preview_player
Показать описание
Only expensive lenses are good, right? Discover whether Sigma lenses are a pro-level choice for your photography and video needs. In this video, we dive into 5 key reasons why Sigma lenses are essential for professional photo and video work.

From their exceptional build quality to their stunning image quality and versatility, Sigma lenses compete with some of the best lenses for pro photography. If you're searching for the best lens for your professional work, be sure to watch this video to see if Sigma lenses are right for you.

I talk about the reasons why I use exclusively Sigma Art lenses for my video production.

Thanks for watching! Please do share helpful feedback.

Check out our other videos:

Find us online & social media:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I bought the Sigma Art 35mm f1.4 a few years ago and it is one of my most used lenses. Brilliant.

thebrowns
Автор

Very informative and useful, Thank you Adrian! God bless and good luck!

balamina
Автор

5 reasons why I use sigma:
1) I love the images they produce
2) they are priced right
3) they are sturdy and well built
4) the 105 is great for self defense
5) they keep me in shape and strong

pmandolese
Автор

great video! honestly i love the production value and your opinion! you defiinitely deserve a higher fanbase in my opinion

cappleproductions
Автор

My sigma art 18-35 1.8 apc lens works well with my M50 (fitted with viltrox adaptor). It is like having a bag of prime lenses. It is one of these lenses which makes your arms sore at the end of the day, but produces dazzling results. Although the lens doesn't have image stabilization, the M50 has digital stabilization for video (which gives professional results or weddings etc). They are an excellent long term investment and my lens cost £800, but is as good as a range of prime lenses costing thousands. Even with the APC sensor, the photos look like full frame. I love bokeh in my pictures and video. It makes them stand apart. No single canon lens will touch it!! Thank you sigma.

undertheradar
Автор

I shoot Sony with Leica glass but would love to fill that void for fast/quite wide for auroras without breaking the bank and a Sigma Art lens would be my first choice. I can’t believe they will change the connection end if you need that -that is so service oriented/customer friendly. Thanks for your video!

sarahterry
Автор

I think that quality construction does not only apply to avoiding or preventing accidental drops but it does also apply to holding a nice gear in hand.

MadEscuela
Автор

I bought Sigma lenses for my Sony. The 24-70 f2.8 and the 100-400 contemporary. The contemporary isn't as good as the Sony equivalent, but it's massively cheaper and lighter. It's great for travel/wildlife photography because you're breaking your back bringing it everywhere and it's easy to hand hold.

joepiekl
Автор

I shoot with the R6, the lack of quality/affordable primes had me look at 3rd party. I use the ART 40 & 105mm for my portrait business and it’s top notch. I would stack the 105mm against the RF85mm 1.2 any day that the CLIENT can’t tell the difference. We get too obsessed at specs when most clients have NO clue, they just see a nice pic. Bokeh means nothing to them.

MichaelFrederickPhoto
Автор

OK, you have 28mm f1.4 and that with 40mm and 105mm F1.4 are the best of Sigma Art lenses. 105mm F1, 4 has a bit of cult following as it is a unique focal length and it is difficult to find a portrait prime lens like the 105mm F1.4, .

jliang
Автор

great and lovely video! i love sigma art lens! wish they made it for the rf mount, can't wait to watch the next video!

RWAquariumPages
Автор

I started using sigma's glass with the well known sigma 17-50 2.8 for apsc. It was a good lens for it's price really. Then I bought the 30mm 1.4 also for my apsc, and I got fascinated with the images i got with it. Soon then, I couldn't resist and bought the 35mm 1.4 and then the 50mm 1.4. Sold the 70D I had and the lenses too, and bought an RP with an adapter. If I could buy one now, I would go for the 24-70, but I will have to wait a little bit for that one. For anyone asking themselves if they are good enough I can highly recommend to try one. They are cheaper, and yet very good quality professional lenses.

sebascantelmi
Автор

Good video, I'm a Sigma user myself so gladto see my opinion about the sigmas isn't different

codm_fire
Автор

Great video. In fairness, as someone with both Canon and Sigma glass, I don't think they're as comparable as you do. I mean, sure, if you want to shoot at brick walls and charts while measuring distortion and sharpness the Sigmas more than hold their own, but, do any of us work like that? Especially for video I much rather prefer the look and color rendition of the Canons. EF glass for a softer look, and RF glass for a punchy one. Besides that, I've found the Canons typically are quieter and more accurately focusing, hold tracking better etc. Where do Sigmas shine?...they're cheap, sharp, and robustly built....just a little too sterile to my eye.

loudandclearmedia
Автор

Excellent video! I wonder whether if Sigma hadn't gotten so good, Canon wouldn't have restricted the availability of third-party lenses...

fepatton
Автор

Hello,
I’ve seen some reviews saying that Sigma’s 24-70 IS in video has a problem (it’s still shaky) is that true?

Joe-h
Автор

Even some of the pre "art" lenses were bloody good as well.
I'm still using a 50mm f/1.4, fabulous if you take the time to micro adjust it, and a 105mm f/2.8 macro. Available for a song these days.

mcmoose
Автор

Good information. I’m looking at buying my second Sigma lens.

kaylashoemaker
Автор

Just wanted to ask if the autofocus on the Sigma 24-70 works on the Canon R5C.

Autofocus doesn’t work on my Tamron G2 lens and am looking to replace it.

ADVTRV
Автор

Could it be you like shooting at 28mm seeing as all three of them do that? :D jokes aside, I completely agree. I only own the 18-35 but that lens is just insane coming from a kit lens first and then the canon 50mm 1.8 everyone has. Which I also adore because that is the lens I first really started to learn photography on and it is so much fun to shoot. But the jump in quality from the 50 to the Sigma is nuts. When I first got it I was blown away and still am some 2 years later.
Great video. Will be watching more

edit: the only thing I don't like about it is the lack of IS as my canon 800d (t7i) doesn't have IBIS either

richardrude