People Keep Getting THIS Wrong... Nvidia vs AMD vs Intel

Nvidia va AMD vs Intel GPUs. Which manufacturer makes the Graphics Card that's right for you? We will explore: GPU value, rasterization performance, raytracing, upscaling (DLSS vs FSR) vs Xess, memory capacity, streaming, VR, Software and Stability, power efficientcy and Professional applications. Hope you Enjoy!

👉👉👉👉👉👉👉 SPONSOR 👈👈👈👈👈👈👈
25% Coupon code for software: TL20:

👉👉👉👉👉 PRODUCTS USED 👈👈👈👈👈
(Links are Affiliate Links when possible)
As a retail affiliate, I am paid a percentage of qualifying purchases at the expense of the retailer.

👉👉 VIDEO MENTIONS & RELATED CONTENT 👈👈
Here is where the additional content / references I mentioned in the video will be - as some other content I think you would enjoy!

👉👉👉👉👉👉 LETS GET SOCIAL 👈👈👈👈👈👈
► Instagram ❯TechLens.Official
► Facebook ❯ TechLens.Official
► Twitter ❯ @TechLens_Real

#Intel #Nvidia #AMD

👉👉👉👉👉👉👉 CHAPTERS 👈👈👈👈👈👈👈
0:00 Intro
0:53 Sponsor: Whokeys
1:31 What the Community and ChatGPT Thinks
4:24 Rasterization / Pure Gaming Performance
5:47 Raytracing
8:43 Upscaling and Frame Generation
10:36 Resuts: Gaming
11:51 Other Important Considerations
13:59 Results: All

[Technerd]

Nvidia if you need cuda. AMD if you want price to performance. Intel if you whant to be unique. I can't go without cuda, lets hope rockm is good.

[VelcroSnake]

5:37 - Man, those non-RT water reflections looked intentionally bad. I've seen tons of games without RT with water reflections leagues beyond that. In fact, I think that was CP2077, which I'm pretty sure has better non-RT water reflections than shown there.

[AndreyStevn]

Some days ago I asked ChatGPT about Nvidia 40s series and AMDs 7900, it turns out, ChatGPT's data was included until 2021, so anything after that, it's not on their system.

[culo]

First thing to consider is not performance imo, it's budget. Determining the most performant card, either in absolute terms, or relative to price is entirely irrelevant if you can only afford up to a certain point. Therefore I think one should first consider how much they can/are willing to spend THEN any type of perfomance metrics including raw rasturization, features, etc.

[unrelentingstrength]

I want to upgrade from an AMD RX 6400 to an NVIDIA RTX 40 series, but the only thing that's confusing me is my monitor. It does say it has g sync compatibility, but its a freesync premium model (Lenovo Legion Y27H-30). Thank you for your tech tips. Really appreciate your efforts @TechLens.

[tonydalimata]

Im a gamer and a gamer only.
Price to performance is king.

Something to mention is matching your gpu to your monitor or the monitor you plan on upgrading to in the near future.

[Cynical_Finch]

I would love to see you do a companion video to this one on how to choose the right monitor once you've chosen the right GPU for your needs and budget.

[mbgmadbull]

Cool but what if VR performance is a deal maker?

[cetriyasArtnComicsChannel]

not a gamer at all, just want to work with very large files in adobe, while getting a good price. is AMD enough? currently have an old I7 and Nvidia that seems to not have an updated drive I can download and laptop kinda runs warm. current on windows 10 (not compatible for windows 11)

thoughts?

[waynewayne]

@TechLens Can u help me build a gaming pc and video editing all round pc build please

[Definesleepalt]

also one thing to consider, Nvidia has Cuda cores which just outperform everything else in terms of AI, all the Non cuda cards that outperform are mostly just for data centers

[sula]

AMD
*good price to performance
*usually ages well
*good for linux support, open source friendly
*forget about Raytracing in most games, maybe there are custom solutions in some games, but they are probably beta hacky ways and tank performance
Nvidia
*Higher price usually compared to AMD or Intel
*Better for Raytracing
*Better for content creators, video recording. Not that AMD cant do it, Nvidia just has better support and features
*No open source drivers nor presence.
*If you want the absolute best raw performance Nvidia often seems to win still, but with a colossal price tag
Intel
*Its new so be ready for more bugs
*price is quite good
*no raytracing
*no open source friendliness at all, moreso anti behavior
*for experimenting i guess?

Finally company loyalty is a pointless thing, any company just wants your money. Buy what you need and want.

[dianaalyssa]

Free ChatGPT doesn't time include the current gen unfortunately. Have 1060, 3060 12gb, and 7900XTX.

[teardowndan]

Intel could be great value per dollar, but you have to make the bet on future drivers bringing performance closer to where it should be more uniformly. Right now, it does great in some games beating the 3060Ti, horrible in others where it cannot even keep up with the 3050 or fails to run altogether. A 2+X relative performance spread from best to worst is ridiculous when GPUs usually fall within a fairly consistent +/-10% of where you'd expect them to be based on averages, excluding comparison-breaking features.

[mikebruzzone]

James apply change in quantity to the 204 SKU WW channel dGPU inventory sales and trade-in trend table and find out what people are really buying (outside AD and RDNA lll) and you will be surprised [?] and will likely ignore it [?] because who in tech tube makes sales referral from what people are actually buying in terms of the last 5 months GPU sales? mb

[numb]

I like how you tell anything, maybe a bit slow, but, whats with buying a GPU for something else than Games? Blender, Maya, Unreal; 3DMax, 3DScanners and Apps. That is rare good compared contend.

[fang]

can someone please help im building my first pc and i want about a 1800 - 2000 dollor price range so kinda high end i can't decide where to get a 7900 XT or 4070 TI since i never really use nvidia or AMD graphics cards since this is my first build so can some one help me

[nathangamble]

"no-one scoffed at 3090 Ti Ray Tracing performance"
False. I do. The 3090 Ti's performance was awful for its price, and the loss of performance relative to the graphical improvement meant enabling ray tracing was almost never worthwhile on the 3090 Ti, except in the RTX mods of old games like Minecraft RTX. IMO Ray tracing isn't worth using until the performance loss from enabling it is less than around 30%, or until ray/path tracing settings that revolutionise graphics (rather than only changing a few reflections and shadows that you don't even notice while playing) are available in most of the games that people play and can run at playable frame rates on most GPUs.
The RTX 4090 is the _only_ GPU that can run Cyberpunk 2077 with path tracing at 1440p (or 4K with DLSS) at playable frame rates. As far as I'm concerned, ray traced graphics in games will mostly be gimmick and a waste of money until at least that level of performance and graphical detail is available in multiple games on midrange GPUs. This will likely happen through a combination of hardware and software improvements. I expect that we'll get there around 2026 with the RTX 5070 and RX 8700 XT. But right now, the 4070 Ti doesn't have enough VRAM for RT in next-gen games, the 4080 is overpriced for its overall performance, the 7900 XT and 7900 XTX aren't properly-optimised for path tracing, and the 4090 is only for people with money to burn.

[shremk]

In terms of ray tracing performance, there are a few discrepencies with some games that make me question how much of Nvidia's lead is because of their hardware advantage compared to just optimization. For example, in Metro Exodus Enhanced, while they're is still slower by a good margin, AMD is a lot closer to Nvidia than in many other ray tracing games despite it having arguably some of the best ray tracing around.

[Haydenh]

Chatgpt was trained on data from 2020, so for new stuff its still really bad