L-32-Basic Structure of the Constitution | Kesavananda Bharati Case | Indian Polity for UPSC By VeeR

Lecture 32
Timestamp
00:00 - Welcome to SLV
00:06 - Last Lecture Overview
BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION
02:40 - Emergence of the basic structure (Shankari prasad case 1951)
06:44 - Golak Nath Case 1967
09:28 - Kesavanandra Bharati Case 1973
12:49 - Minerva Mills Case 1980
14:19 - Waman Rao case 1981
15:37 - Elements of the basic structure
18:37 - Be Happy, Share & Help each other

#KesavanandaBharatiCase #BasicStructure
Indian Polity by #Laxmikanth for #UPSC #IAS #CSE By VeeR

👍"Learning is Priceless"
👉For Discussion PDF:-

Kesavananda Bharati case(1973)- Supreme Court - judgment in the Golak Nath case (1967).
It upheld the validity of the 24th Amendment Act (1971) and stated that Parliament is empowered to abridge or take away any of the Fundamental Rights.
At the same time, it laid down a new doctrine of the ‘basic structure’ (or ‘basic features’) of the Constitution – Constituent power of Parliament under Article 368 does not enable it to alter the ‘basic structure’ of the Constitution

PART I
Constitutional Framework
1. Historical Background
2. Making of the Constitution
3. Salient Features of the Constitution
4. Preamble of the Constitution
5. Union and its Territory
6. Citizenship
7. Fundamental Rights
8. Directive Principles of State Policy
9. Fundamental Duties
10. Amendment of the Constitution
11. Basic Structure of the Constitution
PART II
System of Government
12. Parliamentary System
13. Federal System
14. Center–State Relations
15. Inter-State Relations
16. Emergency Provisions
PART III
Central Government
17. President
18. Vice-President
19. Prime Minister
20. Central Council of Ministers
21. Cabinet Committees
22. Parliament
23. Parliamentary Committees
24. Parliamentary Forums
25. Supreme Court
PART IV
State Government
26. Governor
27. Chief Minister
28. State Council of Ministers
29. State Legislature
30. High Court
31. Subordinate Courts
32. Special Status of Jammu & Kashmir
33. Special Provisions for Some States
PART V
Local Government
34. Panchayati Raj
35. Municipalities
PART VI
Union Territories and Special Areas
36. Union Territories
37. Scheduled and Tribal Areas
PART VII
Constitutional Bodies
38. Election Commission
39. Union Public Service Commission
40. State Public Service Commission
41. Finance Commission
42. National Commission for SCs
43. National Commission for STs
44. Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities
45. Comptroller and Auditor General of India
46. Attorney General of India
47. Advocate General of the State
PART VIII
Non-Constitutional Bodies
48. Planning Commission
49. National Development Council
50. National Human Rights Commission
51. State Human Rights Commission
52. Central Information Commission
53. State Information Commission
54. Central Vigilance Commission
55. Central Bureau of Investigation
56. Lokpal and Lokayuktas
PART IX
Other Constitutional Dimensions
57. Co-operative Societies
58. Official Language
59. Public Services
60. Tribunals
61. Rights and Liabilities of the Government
62. Authoritative Text of the Constitution in Hindi Language
63. Special Provisions Relating to Certain Classes
PART X
Political Dynamics
64. Political Parties
65. Elections
66. Electoral Reforms
67. Anti-Defection Law
68. Pressure Groups
69. National Integration
70. Foreign Policy
PART XI
Working of the Constitution
71. National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution

🙏🏻" A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle"🙏🏻
👍Be HappY, SharE & HelP EacH OtheR!!! ...VeeR
ThanK YoU!!!

[StudYLoveRVeeR]

👍"Learning is Priceless"
👉For Discussion PDF:-

[OfficerDisha]

Jay hind jay bharat sir ji 🇮🇳🙏😊

Feedback-10/10🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

Thanks for wonderful lecture sir ji 🇮🇳💞🇮🇳

[jaya]

Done 👍
🔲 Shankari Prasad Case *1951* - constitutional validity of the First Amendment Act *1951*, which curtained the right to property was challenged .

🔲 Supreme Court in the Minerva Mills Case *1980*

🔲 Parliament under article *368* can amend any of constitution including the Fundamental Rights but without affecting the 'Basic Structure' of Constitution.

Thank you sir... Jai hind 🇮🇳

[vjk]

In short:

Chapter 11-
Basic Structure of Constitution:

After implementation of the Constitution, No F.Rs can be altered/changed.

BUT all ramayan started!!!

1. {PARLIAMEMT}
Shankari prasad case (RTProperty)- 1951 (1st Amendment)= Parliament can take away any F.R by AMENDMENT and such LAW will not be void/considered under Article 13(i.e.saying that "LAW" can be void if hurting the F.R but "AMENDMENT" can be done instead of it within constitution)

2. {S.C}
Golaknath case- 1967(24th Amendement)= Parliament has no power to alter the F.R, if it does then that would be considered as a LAW & that LAW cannot alter the F.R

3. {PARLIAMEMT}
(same as Shankari Prasad case)
1970 = Parliament can take away any F.R by AMENDMENT and such LAW will not be void/considered under Article 13

4. {S.C}
Kesavananda Bharti - 1973
Parliament can change anything BUT cannot alter the Basic Structure(B.S) of Constitution & F.Right is the B.S

5. {Parliament}
1975(42nd Amendment)= Parliament can change anything W/O interference of Court

6. {S.C}
Minerva case - 1980
Parliament cannot enlarge/extend the amending power under Article 368 & says that Judicial Review is the Basic Structure of Constitution and cannot be altered/changed.

7. {S.C}
Waman Rao - 1981 = S.C applied the rule BASIC STRUCTURE to Constitutional Amendments enacted after 24April1973 (judgement date of Kesavananda Bharati Case)

[SUMANKUMARI-hiqf]

Thanks a lot sir for your great help, you are doing a great job for all needy person like me. In my dictionary less words for expressing thanks to you. Great teacher doing great job

[OfficerDisha]

Jai hind sir ji 😊🇮🇳🙏
Feedback 10/10👌❤️👏
2nd Revision done 👍
(11/4/2024)

[ashwaniyadav]

Revision done
🔺-Shankari Prasad case - 1951, 1st Amendment, Right to property
🔺-Golak Nath Case - 1967
🔺-Keshwananda Bharti Case - 1973, concept of basic structure
🔺- 42nd CA Act - 1976, according to Article - 368 Parliament can amendment and no amendment can be questioned in any court.
🔺-Minerwa Mills case - 1980, judicial review is a basic structure of the constitution
🔺- Waman Rao case - 1981
Jai Hind sir ji 🙏🇮🇳

[OfficerDisha]

Jai hind sir ji 🙏😊🇮🇳
Revision done sir (30/6/2024)
Feedback 10/10👍👌
Thank you so much sir ji ❤🎉

[deveshanand]

'joke ho ya government ke saath' was epic .

[PlaySoccer_]

Thank you sir for your well deserved work 😚.
Video lecture 10/10

[babitashakya]

Jai Hind sir 🙏
Revision Done sir 👍
Thank you sir for valuable lecture 😊🌹⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

[poonam]

Jai Hind sir🇮🇳
Revision done sir 👍
Thank you bade bhaiya 😘

[pihu]

Thank you Sir .
Very Productive Lecture Sir .

[anilraunia]

Good morning shining star Sir🙏🙏🙏

Please Sir, aayse hi smile kerte rahiyega ☺☺☺

Thank you soo muchh Sir 🙏🙏🙏& Jai Hind🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

[iasthekiteking]

Thank you so much Sir for your valuable lecture ❤️

[chandrama.patowary]

😊😊2nd time revision veer sir😊😊
🙏🙏Thanks sir🙏🙏

[RakeshKumar-zkpd]

Ur lecture sr..give a large information...in a short time..
All concept and doubt clear.
Thanku sr

[mamtasahu]

1 time hm aapki. Polity class le rhe h....
19.01.2021

Thnks a lot sir 😍🙏🙏🙏

[Manthan]

Good Morning Sir ...Revision Done on 21st October 2021

👉SCORE -10/10

Thank You Sir JAI HIND

[missionupsc]

Done sir 3/11/19
🥇Shankri prashad case 1951
🥈golaknath case 1967
🥉kesva nad bhartiya case 1973
🥉 mMirnava mills case 1980
🥉vaman rao case 1981
Thank u