India Will Never Be Like China - Here's Why

If India's manufacturing sector grew at 8% compounded for the next 30 years and China's stayed the same, India's still would not be as big. That alone reflects the scale of the challenge India faces.

India's economic rise leads to honest questions about how it fell behind China in the first place. It's strange relationship with the Soviet Union, colonial legacy, manufacturing challenges and past policies have all played a role.

India's demographic dividend is more time sensitive than most people think. Yes, it has advantages but the window and manner to capitalise upon them is
not permanent or straight forward.

#india #economy #indiaeconomy #china

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Enjoyed the video?

Subscribe to my newsletter!

Follow AltSimplified on Social media:

[Wwmmgg]

Indian society reward hot air talking. Chinese society reward hard working. After 40 years, the results are obvious.

[chinrichard]

China and India are not in the same category for comparison.

[Ahoooooooo]

A few years ago, every title was India is the next China . Or even replace China .
Now, every title is, India is not the next China

[FallenLeavesBackToRoots]

Apart from the population size, these two countries have absolutely nothing in common.

[peterchin]

Chinese culture does not allow one talks harder but works harder.

[aijoy]

education, infrastructure, anti corruption and government policy are the key

[yc]

India is an example that "democracy" doesn't guarantee social justice, productivity, or stability.

[GLOBALALLIANCE]

I visited India in March 2024 to see for myself the real India. I was in China just before the pandemic, to be honest India still has a long way to go to catch up to China perhaps in 50 years I am being optimistic 😅

[yoingen]

More than a thousand years ago, Chinese monks went to India to study Buddhism. He recorded in detail the dozens of federal states in ancient India and the squalid conditions in India at that time. During the same period, China already had urban cleaners. I think India has been more like a group of uncivilized tribes since ancient times. They pay more attention to the spiritual level and do not care about the living conditions of ordinary people.

[qiaoningwang]

india talk, China work, who will win?!!

[abrahamtan]

India always dream to be like China, but Indian don't know China nor learn about. One thing Indian do well is talk but Success isn't by mouth but by deeds, hard work, sacrifices. India need several hundred years to get near China.

[corn_]

India lacks in, education, infrastructure, manufacturing sector, ect. Everything that is the backbone of development is lacking in india. And the sad part is people still dream about India becoming the global super power.

[mijmijrm]

only China can be China. China, the Nation, is what emerges from the society in China. India doesn't have China's society. Simply having population and money isn't what makes an economy. We're used to thinking of economics as if it's a technical subject like electrical engineering or physics. It's not. The economy is what emerges from society. So, how society organises itself and its values, etc are what determine the economics. India will be the next India.

[goldriverbank]

China made plans and excute the plans. India made plan, execution none😂

[frank-jsnf]

Indians had no idea that China's civil war and resistance against Japanese aggression had lasted for 30 years around 1940. At that time, China's long-term chaos severely damaged China's economy. Around 1940, there was no major war in India at all. India was in a period of peace, and in 1840, China's GDP accounted for over 40% of the world's GDP. Indians always enjoyed comparing the GDP of the two countries in 1940, but in fact, there was no comparability. In 1949, the Chinese Nationalist Party and the Communist Party invested more than 14 million troops in the civil war, which swept across China from north to south. In the end, the Communist Party won the victory and drove the Nationalist Party to Taiwan. China's independence was achieved through large-scale wars and countless small-scale wars, while India's independence was achieved through sit ins. The implementation is completely incomparable, Although India illegally invaded China's Tibet/Xizang and occupied a large part of China's territory, including Kashmir, Ladakh, and southern Tibet, since 1903, China has always been very restrained. In the 1962 invasion and counterattack against India, China only sent a small number of troops. If there was a large-scale land war, all Indian troops would have no hope of victory. In the history of the world, large-scale wars involving more than 1 million people basically took place in China. Most Indian people have not realized China's friendliness to India until now. If China were replaced by Russia, India would have been destroyed long ago

[kaisign]

Indian please don’t talk but do and show the world 😂😂

[AO-owtt]

It does not matter whether a country has a political system that follows or not the US/Western values of "democracy" What really matters is whether the political system serves or not the well being and interests of the people in that country.

[yyds]

Why compare a Mansion with a junkyard?

[chanas]

They all move out from China to India ? Show me the evidence 😂😂😂

[jefftyt]

You can watch this video in 2124 and the title is still applicable