IPL Auction Debate: Retentions and RTM | R Ashwin | PDogg

preview_player
Показать описание
In this episode of "IPL Auctions Debate: Retentions and RTM," we dive into the complexities of player retentions and the Right to Match (RTM) card. R Ashwin and PDogg offer their insights on how teams should approach retentions, the strategic use of RTM, and the potential game-changers in the upcoming auction. Tune in for a dynamic discussion as we analyze the impact of these decisions on team compositions and the overall IPL landscape!

#ravichandranashwin #pdogg #iplauction #msdhoni #iplauction2024 #iplretention #csk #aroundtheworld #rashwin #ashwinchannel #india #indiacricket #indiacricketteam

HIT THE BELL ICON TO STAY UPDATED

Watch Out Our Previous Episodes of Payanangal Mudivadhillai👇

Watch Out Our Previous Episodes of T20 World Cup Preview:

Watch Out Our Previous Episodes of Kutti Stories with Ash: Season 2

Watch Our IPL 2024 Team Previews Here

Check out my Previous "Around the World of Cricket" Videos Here

🏏 Mission 2023: The ODI WC is Go | Schedule | Venues | Build up

Follow me on:

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

4 rent, 2rtm is perfect, 5 years once mega auction, retired uncaped player rule so we retain ms

richardparker
Автор

Pdogg wants the auction done in half a day which is understandable. But on the other hand the media rights of this tournament is 50, 000 cr. Let that sink in. They wont splash the cash if the auction is a 3 hr event.

TamilCricketNews
Автор

Hope you guys are enoying the episodes of 'IPL Auction Debate'. Let us know what other IPL topics you would like us to debate about.

AshwinRavi
Автор

Completely disagree with the Pdogg suggestion here. Obviously we need to address the salary inequality between Indian and Foreign cricketers and also between Retained/RTM cricketers and Auctioned cricketers. But we can't make the auction process more complacent. The reason why the IPL auction is as big a spectacle as the tournament is because it is too simple for a viewer to understand. If we make the rules and processes too complicated, then the existing viewers themselves will lose interest let alone new viewers. I am not belittling the knowledge of the viewers but i believe we need to think from a layman's perspective. But i completely agree with Ash's solution on RTM. I would like to point out that none of the T20 league drafts/auctions generate even 5% of the IPL auction excitement because of how simple the process is. I can't think we can trade off that simplicity.

TamilCricketNews
Автор

I would like the retentions to be the same as usual. 4 + 2 RTM. But I would want to change one thing. These 6 players( including 2 RTM ) can negotiate a salary with their team which can be max 2X of their retained salary(had to be disclosed). But this additional salary wont be deducted from the auction purse. The teams get their favour of retaining the player and the playerz get their increased salary.

TamilCricketNews
Автор

I feel there is no point of RTM if you can outbid. How is it difference from normal bidding!

vikkramsasidharan
Автор

00:10😂😂, 2:03 pdogg mentions RRs retention approach, 2:28 SRH retention approach. 3:19 CSK retention options 3:55 pdogg's sir asks 0 retention and 10 RTM 😮, 6:23-09:37 pdogg sir explains his 10 RTMs methodology, 7:35 ash anna comes to break it down for us plebians, 13:30 15:58 pdogg wants an amendment to RTM rule, 14:40, 16:55 19:05 ash talks about demerit of RTMs, 22:33, 23:35, 21:51😂, 20:08 😂😂😂, 21:04, 25:46 fin

Sarabheswaran
Автор

3:58 pdogg says "Zero retentions 10 RTMs" Impossible 👎

koushikraghava
Автор

Anna please do mock auction before the ipl

madavakousik
Автор

Hello Ashwin, Firstly Thank you for your analysis, hard work and efforts to discuss so many topics in cricket, I have been following your channel since 2020, your channel has always enlightened me. Kudos to you and your team. Congratulations on your 500 wickets. You are truly an inspiration for our country. Suggestions for IPL Auction: Retention players should get the highest price in my opinion and auction players should always receive less than retained players. For ex: RCB retains Virat, He should have the highest price in the team, rest of the players should be below him, similar with Bumrah/SKY in Mumbai, Like BCCI has a grading system of A+ category, A category, B category - Retention players should also have the same. So All A+ category players should have the highest value if franchisees want those players to be retained. Another suggestion is that IPL is for Indian players and upliftment of Indian players, In the auction there should be a cap for bidding, Maximum Bid for Indian player should be below the A+ category of retained player, so for ex RCB retains VK at 25 Cr, then in the auction the cap for Indian auction player- say Siraj can maximum get 25 CR, As for the Foreign player the cap should be at 20 CR. so If RCB wants to buy Will Jacks or FAF - he can max get 20 CR in the bid war, but for Siraj they can go upto 25 CR. This way the number of retentions can be reduced, RTM can be cancelled. Maximum 3 Indian and 1 foreign retention. Foreign players should always receive lesser than Indian players as they have more opportunities to play in different leagues, whereas Indian players do not have that opportunity until they are retired. Bidding war should be seen for Indian players and not so much for Foreign players, whether it is in mega auction or in the mini auction.

KartikVeerakumar
Автор

Whenever the topic is about IPL Auctions RCB Fans be like Halla bol konjam pathu bol 🤣🤣. Pdogg full focus on RCB 🙌.

DJSarvesh
Автор

My honest review is 5 retentions(3 for Indian + 2 for overseas players) + 3 Rtm[1 overseas + 2 uncapped Indian players) + No impact player for upcoming mega auction 2025

bhaskarteja
Автор

Csk : Jaddu Rutu Dhoni Conway Pathirana

Dube and Rachin RTM

subramoniapillai
Автор

The problem is none of franchise is thinking out of the box.... They need to make the core from uncapped and retired player and just have 1-2 superstars

prakashchandramohan
Автор

We don’t want such complicated auction. Just keep 3 retentions and 2 rtm (only 2 foreign )

pavanthomas
Автор

Hi Ashwin! My thoughts are explained below in a example:
Suppose Pat cummins is at 16crs with Delhi and Hyderabad decided to use RTM then the price of pat cummins is 16crs but we should allow delhi to bid again and outmatch their rtm so delhi says 16.25crs then srh can use their rtm again which will not increase the price of the player and now srh has the player at 16.25crs so what this rule does is it will not nullify the advantage of rtm, it is an advantage to the player because if delhi wants to buy pat cummins even for 30crs they have to outbid themselves and no team will be worried about rtm usage.

rahulreddy
Автор

An RTM charge should be applied for the player. Like a certain % increase based on the player slab (predetermined by bcci). If the team applying RTM is okay to pay the premium along with the final auction price, they can apply the RTM, if not that price will be taken as the true value of the player and the last bidding team will take the player. What do you think?

Murallij
Автор

RTM is a fair concept according to me. For example, there is a young breakout player who is most likely not to be retained. The team that scouted him and trained him have the right to get him back as they spotted his talent. Now only the price becomes a deciding factor which is completely fair. And somebody like a Bumrah is not losing 8 crores he's earning 18. There is enough money. The RTM price cap seems like the fair concept.

charansastry
Автор

23:46 Ash Anna Perfectly articulated, Absolutely agree

hasansyed
Автор

Ash anna talking in player point of view, pdogg talking in team owner point of view

balamukunthasaravanan