Many worlds interpretation w Professor Brian Cox

Many worlds interpretation w Professor Brian Cox

[Flowmaster]

explained the cat thing better than ive ever heard it

[paulcampbell]

So that's why I always think I may have won the lottery, until I look at the ticket. 😅

[boathousedave]

Maybe those guys in that sub that imploded are both alive and dead still cause we haven't observed them

[nicholasgramlich]

Couldn't they say the state was "unknown" instead of the contradictory "heads and tails at the same time?"

[mctuble]

Whats crazy to me is you can tell certain people that the earth is a sphere and they will disagree with you but you expect them to believe that the world is based on things that can be both on and off at the same time but whats great is that its so hard to believe but you cant deny it since quantum computers based on this process have already proven it works and can be harnessed to calculate unbelievably fast.

[matthewstufflebeam]

It wasn’t both it was nothing. When you looked you observed one possible outcome another you observed another and so on until all possible outcomes were played out.

[denisibarra]

Love this guy; he is able to explain very complicated things is a very simple manner

[melaniestarkey]

Keep dancing and spinning, you will always be both.❤

[jthomeskillet]

Simply put - Consciousness makes it real.

[jeffreychandler]

A very interesting analysis from Brian Cox that seems surreal. I see that this supercedes, classical, physics as the realm of Quantum physics. I think of "Alice and Wonderland."

[JO-mgxc]

The cat thing is not probabilistic. The cat is alive with 100% probability but the radioactive material decay is probabilistic. So, the live cat is a collapsed state and dies into another collapsed state. The cat alive is NOT a superposition of states. Erwin Schrödinger made a bad analogy. Einstein was right on this.

[mypimpeador]

Physicists always wanna make it sound mysterious or they will lose their jobs. Practical physicists would say “yes but you don’t use probability to observe with your eyes that there is a tree in front of you”

[alexchudilovski]

Does this mean it is impossible to create a dialog within myself?

Piggy managed to do it! Though she had an outside help, with the help of the hunter Jack the Lord of flies started talking to her, though it's so obvious the things the Lord says. But for Piggy it's an entity.

[hopdig]

Why is it so superticious and can only be explained by schroedingers cat wich is ridiculous, observed or not. It collapses and shows there doesnt exist an alternate only reality exist, its a theory

[johnteeboon]

Just bring in a dog, and it will tell you if the cat is dead or alive.

[Werdnasemajjamesandrew]

Not knowing the truth doesnt mean its both. Its unknown. Really sounds stupid the more i hear it.

[danmiller]

Kant said we can only know the object as a phenomenon. This guy is saying he can know what it is in itself before we look.

[muhammadahsan]

Alright so can we use the word either cause we havent observed it so wouldnt it be better to say either than both alive or dead. Cause it is gonna be either one thing alive or dead

[christopherlove]

Or The Beginning and The End..
Too much 👀🥂🤣

[waynejones]

The cat can't be both alive and dead... you just don't know before you look.