Math vs Evolution 2 - Neo-Darwinism is FALSE for Mega-Evolution

Mathematical Challenges to Neo-Darwinian Evolution: Debunking Naturalistic Mega-Evolution - Episode 2.

Welcome back to our series on the mathematical challenges to Neo-Darwinian evolution! In this video, we dive deeper into the world of mathematics and logic to explore why naturalistic mega-evolution, as proposed by Neo-Darwinism, faces significant challenges in creating higher taxa such as kingdoms, phyla, classes, and orders in the biological world.

We present compelling quotes from scientists who participated in the groundbreaking symposium titled "Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution." This symposium brought together biologists, physicists, and mathematicians from prestigious institutions like MIT, Harvard, the University of Chicago, and even Nobel Laureate Sir Peter Medawar.

Quote 1 by Dr. Peter Medawar sheds light on the widespread dissatisfaction among scientists with the current Neo-Darwinian theory. It's becoming increasingly clear that Neo-Darwinian mechanisms cannot account for the complex functional information found in the genome, essential for creating higher taxa. This situation remains unchanged, as neither Neo-Darwinism, the Modern Synthesis, nor the Extended Synthesis provide adequate solutions.

Quote 2 by Dr. Murray Eden introduces the concept of genetic algorithms and the necessity for a stable, formal language in DNA. He emphasizes that random changes to this language destroy meaning and that genetic grammaticality is not sustained by random variation, casting doubt on the core Neo-Darwinian idea that random mutations and natural selection create meaningful instructions for improving organisms.

In conclusion, this video uses mathematics and logic to challenge the capability of naturalistic evolution, particularly Neo-Darwinism, in creating the meaningful functional information needed for higher taxa. We assert that Intelligent Design is required to account for this complexity. Stay tuned for future videos where we'll delve deeper into this topic.

If you found this video insightful, please Like, Share, and Subscribe to our channel for more thought-provoking discussions on evolution and science. Thank you for watching!

[GodSci]

LINKS TO RESOURCES: >> More than 1000 world-class scientists (including 15 scientists from National Academies of Sciences) have publicly declared that they are skeptical of the claims of Neo-Darwinism (that Random chance and Natural Selection account for the complexity of life).


Quote: // “As a biochemist I became skeptical about Darwinism when I was confronted with the extreme intricacy of the genetic code and its many most intelligent strategies to code, decode, and protect its information, ” said Dr. Marcos Eberlin, founder of the Thomson Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, and a member of the National Academy of Sciences in Brazil.//



The videos listed below provide Scientific Evidence and Reasons; and quotes from many different scientists, who mention the specific reasons why they are skeptical of Neo-Darwinism (for MEGA-evolution).


MICRO-evolution is science
(it is testable and falsifiable; and it has been observed in real-time).

MEGA-evolution is NOT science
(it has been falsified by the scientific evidence, on many levels, as we have shown in various videos; but because its believers still hold on to it by faith, that makes Mega-evolution NOT science, but rather, atheist faith).


MICRO-evolution is adaptation of a species inside a genus or family.
This includes EVERY example of observed evolution provided in textbooks (e.g., beak-size changes in finches; industrial melanism in moths; pesticide resistance in insects; antibiotic resistance in bacteria).

MEGA-evolution is the claim of single cell to human evolution, by random chance and natural selection.
This requires the creation of completely NEW body plans, and completely NEW higher taxa (kingdom, phylum, class, order). Low-level speciation inside a genus or family does NOT prove MEGA-evolution. MEGA-evolution has been falsified by the scientific evidence (see below).


THESIS: Naturalistic MEGA-Evolution is False; MEGA-Evolution is Atheist Religion.

NOTE: We list KEY POINTS below, followed by a RESOURCES list with video links to support each key point.

KEY POINTS:

[1] The scientific evidence confirms MICRO-evolution (adaptation of a species inside a genus or family).
[2] The scientific evidence Falsifies MEGA-evolution (the claim of single-cell to human evolution, by random chance and natural selection).
[3] MEGA-evolution is NOT just MICRO-evolution + Time.
[4] The Core LOGIC of Naturalistic Mega-Evolution is False.
[5] There is NO compelling evidence for Naturalistic Mega-Evolution.
[6] NONE of the alleged evidence (that is presented for Mega-Evolution) holds up to rational investigation.
[7] The Scientific Evidence Falsifies Naturalistic Mega-Evolution.
[8] MATH falsifies Naturalistic Mega-Evolution.
[9] Biology does NOT need Naturalistic Mega-Evolution (which is just an atheist myth forced onto biology).
[10] Intelligent Design is a better Model for the Biosphere.
[11] Naturalistic Abiogenesis is Impossible.
[12] ALL of the core tenets of Neo-Darwinism have been falsified.
[13] Therefore, Evolution is a lemon, a car with no wheels, and NO engine.
[14] So, Belief in Naturalistic Mega-Evolution is NOT Scientific; it is a Sociological Phenomenon, a form of Group Think, based on nothing more than blind-faith (that is contradicted by the evidence).
[15] So, Naturalistic Mega-Evolution is nothing more than an atheist creation myth, and an atheist religion (that is falsified by the scientific evidence).

RESOURCES:

Please see the video links below, for each of the listed topics.

[1] The scientific evidence confirms MICRO-evolution (adaptation of a species inside a genus or family).

[2] The scientific evidence Falsifies MEGA-evolution (the claim of single-cell to human evolution, by random chance and natural selection).

[3] MEGA-evolution is NOT just MICRO-evolution + Time.

[4] The Core LOGIC of Naturalistic Mega-Evolution is False.

[5] There is NO compelling evidence for Naturalistic Mega-Evolution.

[6] NONE of the alleged evidence (that is presented for Mega-Evolution) holds up to rational investigation.

[7] The Scientific Evidence Falsifies Naturalistic Mega-Evolution.

[8] MATH falsifies Naturalistic Mega-Evolution.

[9] Biology does NOT need Naturalistic Mega-Evolution (which is just an atheist myth forced onto biology).

[10] Intelligent Design is a better Model for the Biosphere.

[11] Naturalistic Abiogenesis is Impossible.

[12] ALL of the core tenets of Neo-Darwinism have been falsified.

[13] Therefore, Evolution is a lemon, a car with no wheels and NO engine.

NO Wheels: Evolution needs Abiogenesis to even get off the ground; however naturalistic abiogenesis does not work; See:

NO Engine: The engines of evolution are random chance and natural selection; Neither of these work for MEGA-Evolution. See:

[14] So, Belief in Naturalistic Mega-Evolution is NOT Scientific; it is a Sociological Phenomenon, a form of Group Think, based on nothing more than blind-faith (that is contradicted by the evidence).

[15] So, Naturalistic Mega-Evolution is nothing more than an atheist creation myth, and an atheist religion (that is falsified by the scientific evidence).

[JungleJargon]

The claim of evolution is like saying there’s purple grape jelly on the far side of the moon.