Redshift vs Octane - Which RENDER ENGINE right for Cinema 4D | iRender Cloud Rendering - Part 2

Welcome to iRender. In the previous video, we made a render test for Redshift and Octane with six different types of materials. In this video, we’ll take a deeper look at 2 render engines, comparing them according to other factors. Let’s figure it out.
_____________________
This comparison is done on the GPU server 5 of iRender:
+ CPU: Intel Xeon W-2245 @ 3.90GHz
+ GPU: 4xRTX3090, 24GB vRAM
+ GPU Architecture: Ampere, GA102
+ RAM: 128 GB
+ Storage: SSD 512GB
_____________________
Timestamp
0:00 Intro
0:38 Indoor scene
1:01 Outdoor scene - Midday lighting
1:42 Outdoor scene - Sunset lighting
2:23 Summary
----------------------------------------
iRender - Happy rendering
International
Vietnam

[cyanide]

Your comparisons are absolutely amazing.
What truly defines renders are Small, Medium, Big Scene comparison of:
Octane - VRAY - Redshift - Arnold - Corona (For C4d) Also check out utilisation of UDIMS

I think this comparison will close all the questions once and for all.
And also OCIO is the new standard. So if render struggles to operate in that space
(like exporting AOV's, wrong channels, render view is wrong etc it would be also great to understand)

You are doing great job! Thank you for your videos

[agonhazrollaj]

which versions of renders are you using ?

[galalabdo-gl]

Redshift, fast, power, and very good supporting

[postman]

Redshift low contrast, just increase it in Photoshop.

[fernandolardizabal]

Terrible comparison, optimizatiomwise... no way to stablish which if any of these engines were properly optimized