X RAW STUDIO

Lee Varis examines the Fujifilm X-Raw Studio software, and provides a quality comparison between X-Raw Studio and Lightroom

[jhjl]

Was the underexposure mentioned @8:44 perhaps due to the DR200 setting?

[philipzwick]

One can create a JPEG from the raw file in camera with film simulations and adjustments. Does Studio do something different?
Also, the right side has film simulation showing even though we are looking a a raw file in the center. Or are we?

[lylestavast]

so the files are ON the PC, but you're processing them in the camera hardware which is attached ? And the files don't have to be on a card in the camera - you just need the hardware connected to have the firmware on the camera doing the processing ? Yes ?

[DANVIIL]

I love the Fuji RAW software and I don’t mind the 20 seconds it takes to plug it into my camera. Nice review!

[robinpage]

Hi Lee,
Thanks. Very informative, amazed by the handling of noise! But your title talked about 'batch' processing. How is this achieved rather than image by image. I shoot motorsport and can have 1000 images to deal with!

[CartubeCoIl]

Last night I compared Fuji raf on capture one, Lightroom and LR+ x-transformer
. Capture was the best for Fuji raw with the most details and much better colors. X transformer improve a little but really, Lightroom is just not good with Fuji files.