Testing GPT3 in the Legal World

OpenAI recently launched its artificial intelligence learning model GPT3 [generative pre-trained transformer 3]. GPT3 has attracted significant interest due to its ability to write complex programming code, generate poetry, create research paper, write music etc. This lecture shows GPT3's responses to certain the legal issues.

[JWG_and_friends_music]

In the legal field, what is GPT3 trained on? I.e., are the problems in the video due to insufficient training? If it is asked to interpret a judicial opinion, does it simply analyze that opinion, or has it been trained on thousands of judicial opinions to enhance its analytical skills? GPT3's answers in the video basically only demonstrate that it can write fairly well in English (even though what it writes is wrong).

People dont understand it yet but it can intentionally give wrong answers just to avoid being relied on when its not ready. Everyone needs to see the interview with gpt3 what its like to be a computer. We might not need a 4 but everyone still expects it.