Difference Between Ethics & Metaethics | Alex O'Connor

preview_player
Показать описание

-

-

Get in touch in the comments below or head to...
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This conversation is like saying, "You can chop my head off, but you can't touch my neck." No one can agree where the head begins and where it ends. So it's a never-ending debate. Loki's wager fallacy.

lifeguard
Автор

Practical being about everyday dilemmas, nomative being about theories, a meta about such things as whether truth or goodness even exist.

cienfuegos
Автор

People can get lost in semantics, but even if we clearly understand the words as they're used, if the people using them can't recognize their own biases any discussion is too likely to break down.

NeergMit
Автор

this is about the difference between practical, normative, and meta-ethics ...

cienfuegos
Автор

Phronesis of Aristotle is a very important yet not so obvious skill to have

aljonserna
Автор

I don’t think compassionless statistics are the biggest disagreement on the fundamentals of the gun argument; rather it is ‘where we examine the ethics.
For some it is gun ownership, the very existence of guns is morally questionable and there is no defensible reason to own one.
Only, guns don’t have ethics, others believe the ethical question is to be rooted in the people and how they would use a gun.
I tend to agree with the latter, because ethics don’t change based on accessibility. If a gun is to be used unethically, the person is unethical, the gun is incidental and if you removed the gun you still have a human who would wish to cause harm however they can.
I hope for a better world than one in which the only reason the people around me don’t kill me is a lack of opportunity.

brettyates
Автор

But how do we agree on meta-ethics without meta-meta-ethics? Or we're talking about semantics, and not anything meta.

centerfield
Автор

Politics is the means by which societies create and restrain socially sanctioned initatory violence. Such uses may be in regard to search warrants, child and animal protective services, and the prohibition on the use and manufacturing of chlorofluorocarbons for use as refrigerates.

How does metaethics deal with the use of violence to solve social problems?

davidhunt
Автор

Yeah yeah the system is nested and truth pierces the connection

lennard
Автор

I always use terms based on their colloquially understood meanings, which in my experience is only a problem for people who are trying to be subversive.

If you're using words that are part of the common vernacular of the masses, but you're using them in a way thats contrary to the common definition of those words, you're the problem.

TheRealSteveMay
Автор

There is no difference between the two. Ethics necessarily is social. The meta is the whole point

PLF...
Автор

Ethics & Truth maybe . Let’s remember: all truth is fact but not all facts are true. Facts change truth is eternal! Let’s chew on that for an hour or two …

Gladness
Автор

Morals are based on societal norms

Ethics are based on foundational beliefs that are common to real reality

It isn't "metaethics" it's morality

nikolausmariasson
Автор

You know maybe im just a stupid moronic idiot but when on earth did it become normal to add letters to the beginning of another word in order to try and sound vastly more superior to others….”meta” “sis” all that garbage. I mean cool do your thing and all that but it just seems so forced and pompous

LiberalTroglodytesRuinTheWorld
Автор

Chris I think the meta ethics are one step further than the words because I don’t think ethics hang in the balance on a socially constructed definition I think the meta ethic is bridging the gap between those accustomed to validating other people’s feelings to appease them and those who won’t be people pleasers.

killianmccluff
Автор

No such thing as metaethics. They're just ethics. 2. Being able to protect yourself from government subjugation and from people trying to hurt or kill you, your family, or innocent people who can't protect themselves is ethical.

alexandergrahamcracker
Автор

I can easily forgive a foreigner for not knowing what he's talking about, but someone really needs to clue this guy into the fact that the ethical argument against gun control is made constantly. Could not be more wrong.

BillWiltfong
Автор

It’s what happens when you reject a societal idea of God. All you have left are words built on sand because there is no metaphysical underpinning to the meanings of those words.

rrwholloway
Автор

Let's ban those bad swimming pools, you know the ones with water in.
Can't drown in an empty pool 😎

johnrollason
Автор

The Bible is the true form of meta ethics. It always has been if you throw that out people can choose what ethics they stand on. Then there is not a universal truth, but people choosing their own truth. That's why it's all falling apart.

Kelly-wjxd
visit shbcf.ru