Finding the BIGGEST rectangle under y=x^3 (but NO calculus!)

preview_player
Показать описание
We will solve a typical calculus optimization problem without using calculus derivative. The goal is to find the biggest rectangle under y=x^3 from x=0 to x=3 and we can actually use AM-GM inequality to solve this!
----------------------------------------
Big thanks to my Patrons for the full-marathon support!
Ben D, Grant S, Mark M, Phillippe S. Michael Z, Jan P. Devun C. Stefan C. Ethan BW Didion S. NN Minkyu Y Brandon F Levon M shortsleeve Jack P Gabriel G Yeeted C David H Mateo F Emma M Eden E Minicat Jose R Nicholas Fey Tyler B Lucas W Ahmet Ö An R Camila L Luupo Farrah Jordan T Batman 1127 Mathguru Дмитрий П

----------------------------------------
#blackpenredpen #math #calculus #apcalculus
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Nice video, and thank you for being careful with the details (e.g., you verified the variables used in the application of AM-GM were non-negative, you made sure the upper bound was actually a maximum, and you made sure that in the claimed equality case, the x was in the required interval).

remigeron
Автор

Very clever! I did it a different way, bit long-winded but it worked.

A = x^3 (3 - x)
-A = x^4 - 3x^3

Suppose the quartic on the right touches a line y = -b at x = a. (x-a) will be a repeated factor. Write

x^4 - 3x^3 + b = (x - a)^2 (x^2 + cx + d) [edited, see below]
= (x^2 - 2ax + a^2)(x^2 + cx + d)
= x^4
+ (-2a + c) x^3
+ (d - 2ac + a^2) x^2
+ (-2ad + a^2c) x
+ a^2 d

Equating x^3 coefficients
c - 2a = -3
c = 2a - 3
Equating x coeffs
a^2c - 2ad = 0
ac = 2d
d = ac/2
d = a(2a - 3)/2

Substitute back in x^2 coeff
a(2a-3)/2 - 2a(2a-3) + a^2 = 0
(2a-3)/2 - 2(2a-3) + a = 0
a - 3/2 - 4a + 6 + a = 0
2a = 9/2
a = 9/4, the solution for x

Equating constant coeffs
b = area = a^2 a(2a-3)/2
= (729/64)(3/2)/2 = 2187 / 256

pwmiles
Автор

Nice method but I'd still use calculus though!

cdkw
Автор

The academic year has just ended in NZ and highschool students and their parents are up in arms about an optimisation problem involving the min surface area for a cylinder of given volume when the students had not been taught how to differentiate f(r)=1/r. But the answer is arguably the most famous cylinder shape in the history of Mathematics, and like so many of these problems, no calculus is required.

peterbrockway
Автор

Thank you. I must admit, doing the calculus is way easier! In any case, the AM-GM is perhaps a better testing one's resilience in thinking forward.

ronbannon
Автор

Na minha opinião, um dos melhores da Internet: objetivo, claro e resolve problemas valorosos! Obrigado, companheiro!

andrec.
Автор

Calculus master is back with more awesome stuff 🙌🤗

nocturnalvisionmusic
Автор

Oh man that is a satisfying method. Bravo.

graf_paper
Автор

i don't know if you guys will believe me or not, but i thought about am gm just by seeing the thumbnail ( that may be becuz I've done questions like that before ) and definitely it's a very clean way to avoid calculus, thanks for spreading such solutions

abcdwxyz
Автор

Amax using derivative

A = (3-x)*y
= (3-x)*x^3
= 3x^3 - x^4

dA/dx = 9x^2 - 4x^3 = 0
x^2*(9 - 4x) = 0

=> x = 0 (-> Amin=0)
x = 9/4 (-> Amax)

Amax = (3 - 9/4)*(9/4)^3 = 2187/256

gregorymagery
Автор

So much easier to use calculus. A = x³(3-x) = -x⁴ + 3x³. Differentiating we get A' = -4x³ + 9x². Setting that = 0, we have 4x³ = 9x², or 4x = 9. So, x = 9/4.
The area would then be (3 - 9/4)(9/4)³. That comes to 2187 / 256, the same answer BPRP got.

kenhaley
Автор

Beautifully done, what a piece of artistic work.

skilz
Автор

why would am gm come in your head in the first

HeManGNichtDualismus
Автор

Задача очень простая.
S=(3-x)x^3
Находим производную площади.
S’=9x^2-4x^3
Находим экстремум.
x=9/4
Проверяем знак производной справа и слева от точки.
При данном значение Х площадь имеет наибольшее значение.

aranarus
Автор

More generally, the largest rectangle bounded by the x-axis, y=x^3, and the vertical line x=a has area (27/256)a^4 and meets the curve at x=(3/4)a

mathemagician
Автор

i started trembling and sweating at the no calc statement

lucsas
Автор

“Without calculus” proceeds to use a result from Real Analysis without justification 😂

mathemagician
Автор

can someone explain why you can just divide by 3 on a, b, c? I've wouldn't think that preserves the equation or inequality?😮 Thanks

jamescollier
Автор

Is there a general way of knowing when a problem of this type is solvable using this method? Could you do this for any (positive) polynomial on any interval?

colbyforfun
Автор

How is the geometric mean the maximum? Please explain.

paytonholmes
welcome to shbcf.ru