Trackman VS Full Swing Kit | OUTDOOR TEST w/ Rangefinder | Worth the price? ($25,000 VS $5,000)

Big thanks to Laurenz for being a part of this video! He's a legit Div 1 player in the German Golf Bundesliga playing for Munich Golf Club.

This content is NOT SPONSORED - everything's my personal opinion and no brand had any influence on the video before release. The test was conducted to my best ability. Leave a comment below and judge yourself.

If you're looking for an indoor unit, I've made the best experiences with Foresight but that's a completely different use case.

[mikewilliams]

If you can get a Garmin R10, Rapsodo MLM2 Pro, Flightscope Mevo and Swing Caddie and test with those vs quad over the course of time that would awesome as well.

[RayLindsayGolfsim]

Hey Martin, awesome video! It's really intriguing to watch these monitors being tested outdoors individually. We've actually been conducting tests on all units in our Simulator premium room for the past few months, and it's fascinating to see how some of them can interfere with data. By the way, the editing was spot on and I couldn't stop laughing — great job! Keep up the fantastic work! 😄

[jeandiaz]

Thank you Martin. You’re doing a great job. I enjoy your videos a lot!

[bens]

Thanks for this very solid approach in comparing launch monitors with actual true data. Awesome video. Would love to see more videos like this one. Compare GC Quad and Mevo+ vs actual data

[jamesjames]

I just bought the Full Swing…best deal on the market for its accuracy. I directly compared it to Trackman simultaneously on the range…it a nut shell…The Full Swing is a way better valve and just as accurate if you compare apples to apples…data is so close it’s a mute conversation…Full swing has no annual fee…Trackman is $1200-$2000 a year…even though they are both radar they still rely on shot data to a point…Trackman has over 500 million shots of data and Full swing is only at 1 million…a lot of pros are switching to Full Swing…The biggest name of all uses Full Swing and he doesn’t put his name behind something that would be inaccurate…Martin you the awesome at what you do…Full Swing for the win!!!!

[clevited]

Nice little test Martin. I would love to see the quad vs trackman one. When you hit driver, can you make sure you hit a high low spin bomb. Those are the ones where the difference should be most noticeable.

[hankscorpio]

Nice to see this comparison with the real distances 👍 I think the trackman is more expensive due to everything else that comes with it for use indoors, like the games and analysis etc. The monthly and weekly tournaments are sick also, a chance to win actual cash!!

[michaelhudson]

Definitely keep comparing. Great content

[thegolflife]

Would love to see QC Quad vs Trackman which could be done at the same time!

[turfinteractionsgolf]

The fullswing KIT looks pretty good. It's missing a few data points that Trackman has that I use regularly. I use a trackman at the indoor sim room and for example, Low point distance is a very useful measurement for me at the moment for working on swing consistency. I personally have a cheap Garmin R10. It's better than nothing and if you know that it's not perfect you can work with it a bit, but I wouldn't trust it completely. The Fullswing KIT looks reasonably trustworthy, but here's a question - if you broke a Ball Speed world record on it, do you think it would be accepted in the LD community? Or for that would only numbers on a GC4/GC3, Trackman or Flightscope be accepted?

[mattcoulson]

I really enjoyed this video and would like to see a comparrison with the GC Quad purely to see the accuracy of an optical system by comparrison

[ethanaderemi]

"commin right at you" loll great video

[georgesimmons]

I'd definitely take the 5000 full swing. It actually did better in my opinion. Of course we wanna see you rip some with the gc quad borgy

[maricdaerden]

Great video Martin!! I would like to see a comparison with club- & ball data with different device's. Like Skytrak+, Fullswing, Trackman, ...

[grandpagolf]

Good job, Martin, makes things get a little bit closer to reality. ✌️

[MartinMacGill]

Great test! What’s the accuracy of the laser? I think my one is +/- 2 yards…

[Guythatsometimescomments]

Could you please, please do a review of limited flight? Hitting into a net or screen? I love what I am seeing with the outdoor reviews, but would love to know how well it does indoors.

[FlyWithMe_]

3:41 to be fair, who knows what the range finder actually lasered at over 350 yards … Martin, the shed behind, something else? Range finders also get to their technical limits at such long distances.

[wolfiemcwolf]

I use TrackMan. And honestly, sometimes it is all over the place. Especially the impact location. compared it with impact tape and it sometimes reads hard out the heel when it was a near centre strike.

[mdwilson]

Would have liked to see multiple shots for each club/monitor with a deviation for each, then an average deviation for club per monitor, rather than only 1 shot. But appreciate this review a lot