Tiger Woods' FULL SWING vs. Eye XO, Mevo+, and Skytrak! // Indoor and Range test

In true Carl’s Place fashion, we ran some tests, indoors and outdoors, to gauge the Full Swing KIT Launch Monitor’s accuracy. Endorsed by Tiger Woods, the Full Swing KIT has to be a pretty darn accurate launch monitor, right?
We’ve already put the Mevo+, SkyTrak, Garmin R10 and Uneekor EYE XO to the test at the range, so we wanted to see how the Full Swing did compared to real-life numbers.

Products in video:

00:00 Intro
00:19 Out of the box
02:10 Indoor Test
02:48 Full Swing Vs Eye XO
06:00 Full Swing vs Mevo+, Skytrak, Eye XO
09:27 Range Test
10:18 Pitching Wedge
13:18 6-iron
17:17 Driver
21:03 Final Thoughts

[Chip-]

Your indoor review is spot on. I bought a Full Swing Kit about a week ago and the indoor numbers are all over the place. Received it on Tuesday, hit a few indoor sessions with it, gave up and started the return process on Wednesday. I had high hopes but it’s just not useful or fun indoors.

[michael]

If Full Swing advertised as an outdoor / range monitor it would be a fantastic tool. This may be a little crazy - could you use a drone to mark the landing spot and then plant the flag where the drone is hovering or landed for better accuracy than your winded spotter? Great video.

[mpkelley]

Wow, the full swing is garbage at reading ball spin. Can’t get that right then everything else will be off. Thanks for posting. Definitely not something ready for indoor use yet. Hopefully they can adjust their algos or improve the spin reading.

[deanholmes]

Mevo plus is $2000 and is frequently on sale for $1800, the Full Swing is $5000. Why should we buy the Full Swing over the mevo plus, when you said the mevo plus numbers were closer to the uneekor numbers?
Thanks for the video, and a special thanks to Mike for running down all the shots.

[clints]

Can’t believe that tiger put his name to something that is nowhere near as good as its competitors it obviously has big downfalls inside. well behind gc3 and even mevo+

[tellwilliams]

Yeah I see you’re testing whatever measuring devices against whatever merging devices and not testing against track mannered GC quad well because they’re the best and you’re looking for sponsorship done watching your show

[GolfWarehouseAtlanta]

You can easily tell the backspin numbers were WAY off with full swing. The guy swipes across and scoops with whatever iron he is hitting. That spon would obviously be greater than 5k and likely towards 7k of spin. Full swing reads less than 4k. What a joke. Probably works good outside but looks like junk inside.