This Software Can Generate 3D Models and Scenes

preview_player
Показать описание

#3dmodeling #3dGenAI #3dgeneration #Rodin

CHECK OUT THESE AMAZING BLENDER ADDONS ►

MODELING►

VEGETATION ►

MATERIALS & TEXTURING ►

Terrain Generation►

ArchViz & Rendering►

SIMULATIONS & DYNAMICS ►

CLOTH SIMULATION ►

RIGGING & ANIMATION ►

UV UNWRAPPING ►

Clouds & Atmosphere►:
Physical celestial Objects

Productivity►:
Clean Panels

Asset Libraries:

SCULPTING ►

RETOPOLOGY ►

SCRIPTING ►

►►► Blender Courses ►►►
Cinematic lighting in Blender

Toanimate: Blender Animation Course

PostPro
Photogrammetry Course

Human: Create realistic Characters

Alive: Ultimate Character animation Course

The Art of Affective Rigging

Real-time Motion Graphics

Best Blender Course Creators:

DISCLAIMER ► Some links here are affiliate links that help us create more content. Thanks in advance for using our links
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

First thing I always do is read the licensing agreement. As pointed out in another comment, the Rodin licensing agreement contains a poison pill. They own whatever you generate and if you want to use it you have to buy the rights.

BevHarrisWrites
Автор

As long as it looks like this, no customer will want to pay for it. And creating something from scratch is usually faster than fixing already generated objects.

_bulat
Автор

Considering the contract, a 3D artist would be fine.

"The intellectual property rights in the assets (including without limitation 3D Model Assets, pbr textures, text, images, animations, databases, graphics, logos, trademarks, icons, buttons, pictures, videos, sound recordings, etc.) generated during your use of this website, the Services, its design, and source code and all content contained therein (hereinafter "Generated Assets”) belong to the Company."

Anything out of this engine belongs to the company.

zikzakfr
Автор

Basically, this is similar to a photo-based 3D scan model.
It is not practical and requires a lot of processing.
In order to reach the required quality level, it takes effort and time similar to making it yourself.
Even if you make it yourself, you can make it faster with the help of automated functions.

Northerseal
Автор

Yeah. I am starting to think that I should change my profession and make bread for a living instead of 3D.

t.pakulski
Автор

As this improves it will definitely impact people who sell asset/kit bash packs. It'll take a little longer for it to start impacting game ready/ production modeling

shamz_ai
Автор

did you try using multiple images of different views of the same model to get better results? Is that possible or is the multiple image diffusion more like krea or smth?🙏

moritzryser
Автор

It's not free, the copyright is goes to company, and you cannot use for commercial use, and also this is not perfect model, you need to clean up, if you are 3d artist then make it from scratch

vipul
Автор

Thanks for sharing our product! We would like to address the questions regarding copyright raised in the comments section. The license requirement for commercial use applies only to another product on our platform, ChatAvatar. You can use Rodin's generated results for commercial purposes without needing a license. Additionally, we plan to open-source Rodin in the future to contribute to the 3D community. We apologize for any confusion and will update the copyright information on our website promptly to ensure clarity.

DeemosTech
Автор

This looks like they've combined the generative meshes with the quad remesher tools, and is something I'd figured would happen sooner rather than later. Been a hobbyist 3d modeler for a while and this tech both excites and terrifies me. On a personal level I see this as a great way to flesh out scenes with clutter and detail that I lack both the time and patience for. On the other hand, I know this is going to cost people jobs because anything that saves time, saves money, and anything that saves money will be pounced on by the people who provide the jobs.

Dilligff
Автор

Did anyone notice who it is named after? Auguste Rodin😂

sasnad
Автор

Looks like how I used to model in 2008 when I started to learn sculpting. Given time I've learned things, given time these a.i models are going to be competing with each other to be better just like we did to improve. If you can adopt these tools as a 3D artist to aid in production you will keep the standards high, however that said, nothing compares to making something from scratch with accurate UVs, Topology for animation and so on. In terms of prototyping and ideas generation, yep, A.i is helpful.

Polytricity
Автор

wohoo, more art that's being stolen.

benjsarchive
Автор

So Ai can generate 3d models but still can't do retopology.

AnnoyedFrog-wuzi
Автор

I think Im in the vast minority of artist who are kinda excited about AI, there was a time where mathematicians felt threatened by calculators and this feels no different.

leowheeler
Автор

I mean it's "kinda" good for generic model, but what if you need to edit it? What if you need an object that does not exist, an object that came from YOUR imagination? What if i want to edit the textures with my usual layers like in substance or photoshop? What if i need to modify just one detail without regenerating everything? What if i need something kinda precise in term of dimensions? This tech is extremely destructive and difficult to work with (not even mentioning the cleanup). I see this as a tool to create generic model that you put in the background (after optimization) and even for that sometimes it could be even quicker to do it by myself to begin with.

osefman
Автор

For the moment its the same than taking a shitty basemesh then resculpt on it.... for the moment...

lucasgodineau
Автор

It's disappointing to see you shilling this AI crap 🤮

phunmail
Автор

The amount of people crying in comments are the same who watch movies of Hollywood where Ai is used like super madly but when it comes to an individual want to make work flow faster people go crazy lol

sunnymeee
Автор

Those models are not useable. The topology, the uv and the texture is not workable. It will take me a longer time cleaning up than me doing the work from the start.

MitchGonz