Improving Curved Surfaces | Design for Mass Production 3D Printing

preview_player
Показать описание
Curved surface finishes on 3D printed parts can often be challenging, especially with the appearance of layer lines as the part moves up the curve. In this video, we delve deep into the details of why these layer lines appear more distinct, especially on the top of curved surfaces. We'll guide you through multiple solutions that will help you improve the appearance of your parts. Whether you're aiming for a smoother finish or seeking innovative ways to enhance aesthetics, these design tips will open up new possibilities for your 3D printed parts.

If you would like to learn more about how to change your approach towards manufacturing products with Mass Production 3D Printing, make sure to SUBSCRIBE to Slant 3D!

00:00 What Causes "Stair Stepping" on Round Prints?
00:56 Increasing Print Resolution to Improve Surface Finish
02:04 Print Vertically for Consistent Surface Finish
02:42 Use Angles and Flat Edges When Possible
03:48 Pixelated Parts Can Offer a Unique Aesthetic
04:52 Utilize Textures to Blend Layer Lines

🔗 IMPORTANT LINKS 🔗

About Slant 3D

🏭 High-Volume 3D Printing: Scalability Meets Flexibility
Slant 3D's Large-Scale 3D Print Farms utilize 1000's of FDM 3D printers working 24/7 to offer limitless scalability and unparalleled flexibility. Whether it's 100 or 100,000 parts, our system can handle it reliably, while still allowing for real-time design updates, ensuring products evolve with the times. This adaptability is key in today's fast-paced world.

🌿 Sustainable Manufacturing: Eco-Friendly Efficiency
Embrace a system that drastically reduces carbon emissions by eliminating carbon-intensive steps in the supply chain, such as global shipping and warehousing. Our approach minimizes this footprint, offering a more sustainable manufacturing option.

⚙️ Digital Warehouses: Parts On-Demand
Think of print farms as a "Digital Warehouse", meaning we can store your parts digitally on a server rather than physically on a shelf. parts are available on-demand, reducing the need for extensive physical inventory.

*As an Amazon Associate, I earn commission from qualifying purchases.*

Produced by Slant Media
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Suprised they didn't mention adaptive layers, that way you can have 0.3mm layers and transition to 0.1mm as the slope decreases. Same goes for the trapezoid shape.

Litl_Skitl
Автор

Another solution is variable layer heights. Use larger layer heights and only decrease when the horizontal stepover between the layers exceeds a certain size (down to a certain minimum layer height). This minimizes the amount of time spent printing at very low layer height, so the print times aren't increase as much, and you still get much better surface finish.

Autodesk did something similar for their ember 3d printer.


Edit: Added a clarifying statement so that people don't think I'm there one who implemented it.

daves.software
Автор

Not sure if you're aware, but there are variable layer heights in almost all is not all slicers now. It allows you to set really thick layer heights for vertical surfaces while creating a gradient down to a finer say 0.05mm layer height for those rounded cases.

TitanDAZ
Автор

Another option is 'non-planar printing'. In this case, an app would warp the top surface to make it flat, the warped model is sliced, then the app unwarps it, resulting in extruder moves in 3 dimensions per layer--rather than the standard 2--and the result is a smoothly curved top. (Obviously, there are limitations to this method, but it works fantastically well within them.)

KeithOlson
Автор

if he says to just print it on the side im gonna scream.

e: lmao

Crokto
Автор

Hey I just want to give you a big thank you! I enjoy your videos so much and they help us little guys print better parts. I know you could keep this information to yourself and say its trade secrets etc. but you don't. I feel you truly care about the 3d printing industry and want to see everyone be as successful as you, and put out quality parts. Kudos to you and your team. Thank you again for all your awesome videos!

geezerreviews
Автор

“How to prevent stepping”… “make a different part” 😑

Why no mention of variable layer heights?

paultouya
Автор

Embrace the layer line, the layer line is art

kelvin
Автор

Well - adaptive layer height works, which works well in PrusaSlicer and friends. Also, Fuzzy skin, also in PrusaSlicer etc, does what you mentioned lastly, only without any work for the 3d model.

roysigurdkarlsbakk
Автор

Im a new printer here, and this was a very well made video

zachsss
Автор

In prusaslicer I add a height range modifier and choose a range that covers the curve and choose to halve the layer height for that section. You can then click the adaptive layer height icon in the toolbar and choose "smooth" to blend the transition area. I also add a low level amount of fuzzy skin - 0.03mm depth, 0.06mm distance to try hide the layer lines more.

TheAndyroo
Автор

You could try high resolution just on the top portion, getting most of the value for a fraction of the delay. I suppose a slicer could implement gradual layer height reduction to make it even nicer, but even without that, you can improve things a lot for a minor delay.

alexandrosmarinos
Автор

You could just print the part on its side.
The other examples/suggestions are to change the geometry in its entirety which is not printing curved surfaces anymore. The scope for improvement here is null. How do you improve something but not doing it?

Print in ABS and acetone vapour exposure. That is the ideal solution for mass producing curved surfaces.

faizaanmirza
Автор

If you are trying to make tens of thousands just use injection moulding. Like seriously, 3D printing does scale pretty poorly. I understand it is appealing as you can gradually increase capacity as you go by adding more printers, but there is a limit to when it makes sense.

trulsdirio
Автор

Adaptive layer height. It would be great if you could use a formula to determine h as a function of z
For example h = min(max(0.1, 0.4 sqrt (R^2/z^2-1), 0.3).
That would give you the necessary height to have a constant step of 0.4 mm but having 0.3 and 0.1 as upper and lower limits.

lucianoag
Автор

At 2:06 was there a reason to put a chamfer on it even though that profile was flat already? (not sarcastic)

acekozmo
Автор

I love using the stairstep approach to design. I will often go all the way down to .3mm steps, and then the part will perfectly match my designed shape and eliminate the layer effect that happens when you design and try to print curved parts!

CurtWelch
Автор

Cura has dynamic layer height exactly for this reason.
While I find the stock settings somewhat lacking you can customize them to something that fits your need.

DerSolinski
Автор

Maybe I'm the odd one out, but I really don't mind the sort of stair-stepping appearance of layer lines towards the top of a curved surface like that. That said, I understand there's a lot of considerations that need to be made if you're producing and selling parts like this that I as a hobbyist don't really need to consider. I still really appreciate and enjoy your videos, and have incorporated some of your tips into my own designs already.

TheGeneral
Автор

Using the adaptive layer function of the slicer is good too. It only reduces the layer height over fine areas like the top. Saves on printing time.

AntiKipKay