Crysis 3 Performance: Very High vs Low

High quality video comparing Crysis 3 on Very High and Low with frames per second.

Music: The Black Heart Procession - Fade Away (Infamous 2 Soundtrack)

i7-3930k @ 4.3GHz
7970 @ 1125/1575
16GB DDR3 @ 1866MHz
240GB SSD 550MB read/write
7TB worth of Raided 7200 RPM drives

[Varmperonsplitt]

Indeed, I still find both the art direction and vegetation to be more photo realistic in the first installment. Gotta love the physics too, more to push around and destroy!

[XStreamGunz]

I'm happy, Crysis 3 looks good on Low settings. Conclusion : Star Citizin will look good on low settings. Same engine ftw :D

[Varmperonsplitt]

Is it just me or is there no difference whatsoever? If anything, the lights seem to have been re-positioned, but not stripped down quality-wise. Thank you for the upload by the way - this saved me 50 FPS!

[EyesofTheKeeper]

Something about the first one still looks better. Of course nothing was able to run it maxed when it was released.

[EyesofTheKeeper]

Very subtle differences. Most obvious changes are seen in the switch from 1:20 looking out from the cliff. Game was obviously limited by consoles.

[drakenlorde]

I'm pretty sure it's because Crysis 1 has wayy bigger maps and more polys hence more demanding.

Crysis 3 has much more corridor style maps so a lot less stuff to render.

[felipegames]

What is the difference btw High resolutions and low textures resolutions? Setting texture resolution to low increases fps?

[Varmperonsplitt]

Funny thing is I still run Crysis 1 worse than 3. I don't think that has anything to do with optimization since the difference's like 50 FPS. First off, the vegetation's still prettier.

[izzyandry]

i don't care about this fucking graphic or anything . just play and have fun