USS Vengeance VS Resurgent Class Star Destroyer

Our latest versus video, the Resurgent Class Star Destroyer VS the USS Vengeance from the JJ Abrams Star Trek movies.
Get Generation Tech Gear HERE!

Check out what we're reading and playing:

Watch More Generation Tech:

Follow our Hosts

ALLEN XIE
INSTAGRAM AXIEFILMS

Ben Hedges
YOUTUBE

EQUIPMENT USED

[felixautomaton]

After the Star Destroyer won by using a micro-jump, the Star Trek lawyers would crush the First Order for violating their copyright on the Picard Maneuver.

[austinmodeen]

The First Order messes up the micro jump and ends up pulling a Holdo maneuver

[straythrawn]

Me - Why wouldnt the Finallizer just deploy ties?
also me- "ARE WE BLIND??? DEPLOY THE GARRISON!!!"

[androth]

you, much like rian johnson, forgot to have the 1st order utilize their tie fighter squadrons.

[Maeve_Rose]

y'all forgot something important. Phaser engagement range is much larger than turbo laser engagement range. the Enterprise itself can target a pinpoint spot on a planet from high orbit. the Vengeance can just stay outside of effective range for the Resurgent class and just ignore the low yield turbolasers that do impact its shield.

[nickoakley]

Lmao this is about the geekiest thing I've watched in months

[sosaix]

So, you'd have the Finalizer defeat the USS performing the Picard Maneuver?

[akjlarson]

Wow, do you have it wrong. The Admiral Marcus would not beam troops onto the Star Destroyer, he would beam the Storm Troopers and crew off of the ship into space.

[rangodeldiablo]

Thank you for saying that the weapons in SW fire plasma, and are not lasers.

[alexogle]

As I recall, the Picard Maneuver is basically a microjump.

[Truth-of-the-matter]

Forgetting that Star Trek does have Transworp tech and also slipstream drives; while they are not as fast as hyperdrives they can still cover vast differences. Star Wars always relied upon shier firepower which clearly didn't do them justice in all of the battles they lost. Tactical maneuvers could easily beat any slow moving star destroyer.

[ZaGaijinSmash]

Why would they beam men over? Beam torpedoes, like in Into Darkness..

[albertocubillas]

May the 4th be with you. I am currently watching a Star Wars marathon and the empire strikes back is on. I was just wondering, how did Luke fit all that equipment he brought to Dagoba in his X-Wing???? May the Force be with you

[d_jedi]

The hyperdrive would be completely negated by the fact that they’re completely outside of their galaxy and don’t have access to maps.
Meanwhile, Starfleet ships can ALL jump to warp, plot a circular course around a target and light it up because... you can totally fire while at warp.

[ironstarofmordian]

Because I loathe the new cannon, let's go Vengeance!

[MacTX]

There's the cheap trick of beaming torpedoes. Admiral Marcus wouldn't bother beaming over a security detail with a bomb to blow up their bridge, he'd just beam photon torpedoes (probably set to the highest yield) to various sections of the ship. Photon torpedoes against shields and hull armor in space might not be too spectacular but in the air filled ship environment, the chain reaction of secondary explosions would be devastating.

[Zekiraeth]

The reason the Star destroyers are wedge-shaped is so they can focus all their weapons on one target all at once.

[ZEROEVILSEED]

You guys forgot a couple key features of the Vengeance. First it has multidimensional radar so it could easily track a ship in hyperspace. You also forgot about the kamikaze torpedo drones the Vengeance has. I think it would easily follow the star destroyer and finish it off before it could do any repair

[MrThomasCWest]

On the Vengeance, I would utilize the transwarp transporter technology to beam a few antimatter warheads to key points instead of wasting crew. I would have also flooded the area with tachyons to weaken the shields of the Resurgence.

[gilbertohernandez]

6:02 that kind makes sense on Jjs part sense turbo laser is plasma which is hot and it cool in space