How Did OpenAI Go So Badly Wrong?

It’s risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee!

OpenAI is falling apart, and Sam Altman finds himself in the middle of it all. In the space of 5 days, Altman was fired as CEO, 95% of the company's employees threatened to quit, Altman was hired by Satya Nadella at Microsoft, 3/4 bard members stepped down, and Altman was reinstated. How on earth is the maker of ChatGPT (and one of the world's most important AI companies) running into so much chaos?

★ ★ NEW MONEY EDUCATION ★ ★

INTRODUCTORY BUNDLE OFFER (2 for 1):

★ ★ CONTENTS ★ ★
0:00 The Unbelievable Collapse of OpenAI
2:05 Sam Altman Gets Fired
3:08 The Employees Turn on the Board
4:54 The Board Gets Dissolved
7:00 A Ridiculous Board Structure
10:26 The Path Forward

Note: I do not have the ability to answer all emails, but know that each email is read. If enquiring about sponsorship, New Money is currently only seeking sponsorship from established brands.

[NewMoneyYouTube]

It’s risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee!

[jamesblackburn]

I had to listen to two YouTube ads and then two ads within this video, it feels too much

[PokerStylez]

Correction: the board had 6 people in it and 4 members voted to remove Sam Altman.

[connorferguson]

the reason the board was structured like this was to prevent companies from stick their noses where it doesn't belong but sadly it seems egos went unchecked and ruined everything.

[RelaxationRefugium]

Thank you for explaining the situation at OpenAI in a straight forward and simple way.

[TJR]

You have way too much selling of everything nowadays.

[TheDeltaboss]

No mention of Q* and the board's concern? I know New Money is capable of better DD.

[Turdfergusen]

Good for those workers for collectivizing on their needs.

[UX_Andrew]

Sam Altman and Greg Brockman were also on the Board - 6 people in total.
Altman was ousted, Brockman resigned in protest.

For 5 days things changed often hour to hour, there were rumors (even in Washington Post) about the situation - some still not verified.

[farhadfarajov]

In general I like your vids, but it seems like you haven't got this right. Try to search and understand the safety concerns of the previous board on this technology, then things will make much more sense. And, I believe whatever happened, happened for the good. Now it will be way more focus on creating a safe AGI "for the good of the humanity".

[MonkeyLaughing]

I think you almost completely ignored the power grab by Microsoft. The company is supposed to benefit all of humanity but Microsoft seems to increasingly become the biggest beneficiary.

[piotrc]

Really useful. Thank you for that summary

[Pat.Mustard]

This toxic backstabbing and double dealing happens every day in academia.

[ChrisDeJack]

Part of the info in this video is incorrect, the board actually had 6 peoples and included Sam and Brockman. After the firing only the four board members that voted to fire Altman remained.

[Scapester]

Communication problems sounds a lot like Sam discovered something new and did not share his findings with everyone.

[cc-dtv]

oh damn munger and kissinger bother kicked the buffet? I was starting to think munger was immortal, he was surprisingly cognizant for his age

[wholeNwon]

Subsidiary is actually pronounced as it is spelled. There is one; there ARE four, etc. No prepositions at the ends of sentences unless you're a street hood or a commodities trader.

[hammerfist]

The board structure wasn't the main problem in this case. It was lack of integrity, incompetence, and severe conflicts of interest.

[sHrEsThOo]

Would appreciate if you keep all the sponsorship ads either at the start of the video or at the end, please don't put it in the middle of the video

[dovdougherty]

does anyone have any more color on the motivation to get rid of Altman in the first place? I cannot find an explanation beyond the board's initial public statement.